On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 21:18 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Paul Whalen
> wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status
> meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are
>
On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it likely
> affects more packages than just ftp.
>
> Bill
>
[1] seems to be dead. And I haven't found any other places with the source,
apart from some Slackware mirrors.
What
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting
> today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
>
> Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-07-18/fedora-meet
Tomas Mraz writes:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 07:06 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Because that's the only process I want to talk to. A form of
authentication,
> which I already explained. More than once.
This is by no means a form of authentication exactly for the reasons
others told you alrea
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 12:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>> But that's not a use case. There's no way to know why you want to do
>> this: why you care that another process is running the exact same
>> executable.
>
> Because that's the only process I want to talk to. A form of
a
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Chris Adams writes:
> >Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> >> Chris Adams writes:
> >> >Is there any value in this "additional check" (that nobody else
> >> >apparently does)? Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 16:33 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 04:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 15:21:24 -0400,
> > Gerry Reno wrote:
> >> Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
> >
> > I didn't have issues with it, but have now switched to 3.4.5
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-07-18/fedora-meeting-1.2012-07-18-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
On 07/18/2012 04:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 15:21:24 -0400,
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
>
> I didn't have issues with it, but have now switched to 3.4.5-2 which is
> available from koji.
>
It appears my machine has
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:53:13 -0300
Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Monday, July 16 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > cgit is faster.
>
> cgit seems great, but I am not sure it is faster.
>
> sergio@psique /tmp $ time wget
> 'http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb-rhbz-818
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 15:21:24 -0400,
Gerry Reno wrote:
Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
I didn't have issues with it, but have now switched to 3.4.5-2 which is
available from koji.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
I updated one of my F17 machines today and it brought in a new kernel, 3.4.4-5.
When I rebooted the box after all the updates completed it refused to boot.
It just hangs with a non-blinking cursor in the upper left hand corner of a
totally
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 01:05:06PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Pete Zaitcev said:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:55:55 -0400
> > David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the
> > > NetBSD ftp client:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.netbsd.
> The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not
> surprised the maintainer is ignoring it.
>
> Rich.
>
Not too difficult for maintainer to see these lines and see
the difference in exactly four brackets ;)
This maintainer does not respond, and may be not active for about a year
Once upon a time, Pete Zaitcev said:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:55:55 -0400
> David Cantrell wrote:
> > Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the
> > NetBSD ftp client:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnftp/
>
> But we already have a yet nicer FTP client,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:29:03 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0400, Fl@sh wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743
> >
> > Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail
> > is not answer.)
>
> To save everyone the trouble
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0400, Fl@sh wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743
>
> Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail
> is not answer.)
To save everyone the trouble of opening this bug, the summary is:
"bad Socks5Error exception" against the c
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:55:55 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
> Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the
> NetBSD ftp client:
>
> ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnftp/
But we already have a yet nicer FTP client, lftp. Really not point in
tinkering with the plain F
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday July
18th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1
> Package qtparted (fails to build)
That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting
the 0.6.0 to build is more promising?
Michael
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On a related note I have orphaned ifplugd and I suggest it to be retired
from F-18 I took its maintenance when networkmanager was not reliable
enough for my needs but that time is long gone and only inertia insured
that it stayed alive.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package hexter-dssi (orphan)
> comaintained by: oget
I picked the above. I always thought it was mine, and got surprised to
see it orphaned.
Best,
Orcan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream
> >> and no upstream source?
> >>
Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) said:
> Hello all,
>
> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and
> no upstream source?
> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in
> a comment or
> just remove them?
>
> I haven't found anyt
Thanks for all the fast replies. Build successful
Cheers,
Ray
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 02:53 PM, Raymond Pete wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a package which builds fine on my host, as I have my required
>> rpm's installed. How do I install my depende
On 07/18/2012 02:53 PM, Raymond Pete wrote:
Hi,
I have a package which builds fine on my host, as I have my required
rpm's installed. How do I install my dependencies in koji so the package
compiles.
For example, I need zlib-devel to be installed and lapack-devel
Add a BuildRequires: -devel fo
ahhh build-requires:
Cheers
Ray
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>
> Op 18 jul. 2012 14:53 schreef "Raymond Pete"
> het volgende:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a package which builds fine on my host, as I have my required
> rpm's installed. How do I install my dependenci
Op 18 jul. 2012 14:53 schreef "Raymond Pete" het
volgende:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a package which builds fine on my host, as I have my required
rpm's installed. How do I install my dependencies in koji so the package
compiles.
> For example, I need zlib-devel to be installed and lapack-devel
>
>
> Che
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Chris Adams writes:
> >Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> >> Chris Adams writes:
> >> >Is there any value in this "additional check" (that nobody else
> >> >apparently does)? Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling?
> >>
> >> I certainly
Hi,
I have a package which builds fine on my host, as I have my required rpm's
installed. How do I install my dependencies in koji so the package
compiles.
For example, I need zlib-devel to be installed and lapack-devel
Cheers,
Ray
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 07:06 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andrew Haley writes:
>
> > On 07/18/2012 02:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >>
> > Not exactly. You said:
> >
> > > Can you explain, then, the "correctly" approach by which an
> > > executable can affirm whether another pid is either ru
On 07/18/2012 12:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andrew Haley writes:
>
>> On 07/18/2012 02:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>>
>> Not exactly. You said:
>>
>>> Can you explain, then, the "correctly" approach by which an
>>> executable can affirm whether another pid is either running the same
>>> e
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/18/2012 02:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Not exactly. You said:
> Can you explain, then, the "correctly" approach by which an
> executable can affirm whether another pid is either running the same
> executable, or the post-prelinked version of the same
> executabl
Michal Schmidt writes:
On 07/18/2012 12:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Really? An example of a "symbolic link pointing to a non-existent
pathname"?
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 17 18:02 /dev/stderr → /proc/self/fd/2
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 17 18:02 /dev/stdin → /proc/self/fd/0
lrwxrwxr
Anyone with interest in package "echoping"? It's been unmaintained since 2008
and I really don't understand how it could survive so far.
| Echoping is a small program to test (approximatively) performances of a
| remote host by sending TCP "echo" (or other protocol, such as HTTP)
| packets.
http:
On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and
>> no upstream source?
>> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and
> no upstream source?
> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in
> a comment or
> just remove them?
Upload it t
On 07/18/2012 02:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Chris Adams writes:
>
>> Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
>>> Chris Adams writes:
Is there any value in this "additional check" (that nobody else
apparently does)? Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling?
>>>
>>> I certa
On 07/18/2012 12:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Really? An example of a "symbolic link pointing to a non-existent
pathname"?
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 17 18:02 /dev/stderr → /proc/self/fd/2
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 17 18:02 /dev/stdin → /proc/self/fd/0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 17
Yesterday I was working on migrating the legacy sysv scripts for
mailscanner to native systemd when I came across this wiki page [1].
Does anyone know what the current status of this is in the project?
It would be good to get an feed back on certain things with the
migration of it from those t
Hello all,
what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and no
upstream source?
I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in a
comment or
just remove them?
I haven't found anything about such case in the guidelines.
Thanks,
--
Jan Sy
On 18 July 2012 00:56, Chris Adams wrote:
> I ask again: do you have a legitimate use case?
> Is there _any_ case that other checks can succeed that this invented test of
> yours would catch?
I think we all know the answer to that. I've just added Sam to my
fedora-devel blacklist.
Richard
--
d
42 matches
Mail list logo
