* Kevin Kofler [15/06/2012 06:48] :
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
Moorestown has been around since 2010 and several vendors have made phones
using it. None of these h
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
>
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defea
I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
between the new OCaml, camlp5, and coq which I think I have
successfully worked around. (It isn't pretty, but it seems to do the
job.) But now, after the tools a
> yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
> as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
> dependancy on redhat-rpm-config.
Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
fedora packagers.
Though I understand the p
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:46 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Please forgive this top posting.
>
> I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
> say two things:
>
> 1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud of
> Microsoft saying in their EULA that, if you do n
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:42:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Possible options:
...
- Update the file format to fix the password problem and transparently
upgrade the file the next time the user opens it.
I've had a local patch doing this for some time now. The blog post has
me rethinking (o
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
>
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defea
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:42:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> - Obsolete the package with another password manager thats more secure.
> This is not very ideal though as it's unlikely to have the same
> features and so on.
>
> - Update the package with a readme, etc on the issue, replacing th
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defeat
> ARM just like it defeated all the previous attempts at changing the
> instruction set, even Intel's own IA-64. The fastest x86 CPUs are still
> worlds faster than the fastest ARM
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:57:18AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So I would urge Fedora not to waste our time on a low-end architecture
> filling a temporary niche which will become obsolete as demand for
> performance increases. We should rather support only one primary
> architecture (x86, i.e
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote:
So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defeat
ARM just like it defeated all the previous attempts at changing the
instruction set, even Intel's own IA-64. The fastest x86 CPUs are still
worlds faster than the fastest ARM CPUs
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
In my opinion they are in order. From what you said rpm-build did
exactly what it was supposed to according to upstream. By then adding
our Fedora/Redhat specific configuration it does what _Fedora_ wants.
But the fedora rpm-build should work for fedora. We
Hi,
I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
based smartphone:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defeat
ARM just like it defeated all the previous attempts at changin
Le jeudi 14 juin 2012 à 16:52 -0400, Jay Sulzberger a écrit :
> Therefore everything
> is OK, even if in a couple of years, Fedora is completely locked
> out of all ARM devices. In particular, because Microsoft and the
> hardware vendor say everything is OK, anti-trust law does not
> apply.
You
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:56:01PM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> If Fedora appears to accept that Microsoft should have the
> Hardware Root Key, our side's arguments, in several arenas, are
> weakened.
I don't think we've argued that they should, merely that they do.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
>
>>> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
>>
>>
>> I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
>> other than for Fedora.
>
>
> But then those packages n
On 06/14/2012 04:52 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
ad inability to manage keeping the private half of the Fedora key
private: This is absurd. I will be happy to explain methods
which, if Red Hat wanted, would meet all statutory, and real
security, and even all anti-FUD compliance, requirements. Thi
On 06/14/2012 05:29 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 08:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Xavier Bachelot wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a
>>> doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue
>>> with the html files by mod
I spent some time today trying to package up julia. It's pretty messy and
this is no where near complete (it still downloads packages and fails to build
due to https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/933), but thought I'd put it
out there in case anyone else wants to play with it.
http://w
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
other than for Fedora.
But then those packages need to provide some set of macros for debuginfo
packages, so there is som
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:46 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Please forgive this top posting.
>
> I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
> say two things:
>
> 1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud
commit ad0e6f178c06ff553ffe10ad115e38d92fb61c00
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 22:18:14 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec b/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
index 6
commit e8612d715dcff99bf888502b61e83e412f724fc1
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 22:18:08 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Color-Calc.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Color-Calc.spec b/perl-Color-Calc.spec
index 40a6bfd..0603d23
commit 523a09e7d91700d7ae07f2c3115d783fecb3979f
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 22:16:19 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-AnyEvent-BDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent-BDB.spec b/perl-AnyEvent-BDB.spec
index 7dae77e..c
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:46 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Please forgive this top posting.
>
> I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
> say two things:
>
> 1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud of
> Microsoft saying in their EULA that, if you do n
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
Please forgive this top posting.
I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
say two things:
1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud of
Microsoft saying in their EULA that, if you do not run the
Microsoft OS
Please forgive this top posting.
I will not answer now your radical defense of Microsoft, except to
say two things:
1. Your defense would apply also to the decades long fraud of
Microsoft saying in their EULA that, if you do not run the
Microsoft OS installed at point of sale of the hardware, yo
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Peter Jones wrote:
< stuff removed />
> It's completely their decision as to how they
> ship this, and nothing we can do will ever change that.
Peter, this is ridiculous. Of course Fedora might be able to get
matters better arranged.
Of co
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:03 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> > On 06/14/2012 01:56 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> >
> >> If Fedora appears to accept that Microsoft should have the
> >> Hardware Root Key, our side's arguments, in several arenas, are
> >> weak
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/14/2012 01:56 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
If Fedora appears to accept that Microsoft should have the
Hardware Root Key, our side's arguments, in several arenas, are
weakened.
Okay, first off, quit hijacking fedora-devel-list for your unrelated DM
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 14:38 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> P.S. - It looks really strange when you namedrop yourself in your own email.
> It's like referring to yourself in the third person, squared.
I think it was a cut/paste on a press release.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: a
On 06/14/2012 01:56 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
If Fedora appears to accept that Microsoft should have the
Hardware Root Key, our side's arguments, in several arenas, are
weakened.
Okay, first off, quit hijacking fedora-devel-list for your unrelated DMCA
stuff. It's entirely the wrong place for
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 17:21 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Bressers wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
> >
> > Relevation password manager
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Revelation
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mardi 12 juin 2012 ?? 10:58 -0400, Jay Sulzberger a ??crit :
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
>
> >
> > No because secure boot does not limit your freedom in *any* way. If
> > you want to hack on the kernel or other low level stuff
On 06/13/2012 08:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a
doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue
with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the
timestamp, but I don't fin
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Bressers wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
>
> Relevation password manager
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Revelation Password Manager
>
> Has been found to be unsafe.
> http://knoxin
On 06/14/2012 04:19 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Michal Schmidt (2012-06-14 15:10:56)
Is a running jetty really _that_ dangerous? Why do we ship it at all
then? ;-)
Why do we ship Apache, tomcat and tens (hundrets?) of other useful
packages? Jetty unlike most packages _is_ remotely
On 06/14/2012 10:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:40:50 -0500
Josh Bressers wrote:
Hello all,
I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
Relevation password manager
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Revelation
Password Manager
Has been foun
commit 2742c1d8a99953497fa998931caf8b48bf1368af
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:51:47 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Gnome2-Print.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec b/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec
index 1508e3d..9
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:40:50 -0500
Josh Bressers wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
>
> Relevation password manager
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Revelation
> Password Manager
>
> Has been found to be unsafe.
> http://kno
commit dc83022ed2af2235dd29a2b69ee065d4ef268373
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:29:32 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Config-IniHash.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-IniHash.spec b/perl-Config-IniHash.spec
index 84ea
commit a315920e3cb49d3077ac644178f19aa1e7d5bdad
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:29:31 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object.spec b/perl-Devel-LeakGuar
commit ad16583c6cca21a75ecc6a2fd4fcb3f8389517b7
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:29:12 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Locale-PO.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-PO.spec b/perl-Locale-PO.spec
index 3ece628..55f04b1 10
commit 67a587d706ee2078a8fa0260f897a4a6f27ec81c
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:24:26 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer.spec
i
commit 1d9387091e00c77bc045bcf742cb13d9ff8acfc7
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:23:30 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Test-Most.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Most.spec b/perl-Test-Most.spec
index 52b45ca..a382308 10
commit b3d1922edf36495f55d6e7dd7a9c5dea9bae418a
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:22:47 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec
index 5dfc42b..3f143fc 10
commit e93d3b907d1cf51be19e11103a8f3e364c54f425
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 16:22:45 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec
index 7dfb2e3
Quoting Michal Schmidt (2012-06-14 15:10:56)
> On 06/14/2012 02:59 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > +%triggerun -- jetty < 8.1.2-9
>
> You already have one triggerun for jetty in the spec:
> %triggerun -- jetty < 8.1.0-3
>
> You're likely to hit this RPM bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 04:19 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am inclined to believe, the spirit behind Linux has changed, changed
>> >> away
On 06/14/2012 02:59 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
+%triggerun -- jetty < 8.1.2-9
You already have one triggerun for jetty in the spec:
%triggerun -- jetty < 8.1.0-3
You're likely to hit this RPM bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702378
+/bin/systemctl --no-reload disable jet
So...I've transitioned jetty to systemd in F17. However during the
transition I made a terribly stupid thing: enabled the service by
default, which really was an accident (#831280).
This only happens on systems which had jetty installed on F16 and
updated to F17. Since jetty is eclipse dependency
Hello all,
I suspect this is going to be a weird problem to figure out.
Relevation password manager
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Revelation Password Manager
Has been found to be unsafe.
http://knoxin.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/revelation-password-manager-considered.html
I woul
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 04:19 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am inclined to believe, the spirit behind Linux has changed, changed
>> >> away fr
Hello folks!
First, please forgive me for the X-post. The email concerns more than
one team and I really didn't know what mailing list to send it to. I've
therefore sent it to the 3 major lists that I hope would cover most of
the community.
We've been recently looking to reduce the lea
On 06/14/2012 04:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Is "never" appropriate even if one's own experience is with 3 systems? 7
>> systems? 13 systems? 40 systems? Never say never, or always. ;-)
>
> That can widen the class of affected devices, but from there to "all Intel
> WiFi" i
Petr Pisar píše v Čt 14. 06. 2012 v 09:16 +:
> On 2012-06-13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> Can a comps maintainer confirm that yum group used for installing
> >> minimal build-root in F18 has been renamed from `buildsys-build' to
> >> `build'?
> >
> > I don't see that change here.
> >
> I had to us
On 2012-06-14, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> if your only using koji repos then yes you need to use build as thats
> what koji uses internally buildsys-build predates koji in fedora. but
> you really shouldnt use koji only repos with fedora configs. you
> should use the koji mock-config command in ko
commit d20ac8ecd3733b1575ab437e6274a6a9ec480c30
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 14 11:16:29 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Module-Mask.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Mask.spec b/perl-Module-Mask.spec
index 1f3ca6f..9d14
On 2012-06-13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Can a comps maintainer confirm that yum group used for installing
>> minimal build-root in F18 has been renamed from `buildsys-build' to
>> `build'?
>
> I don't see that change here.
>
I had to use mock on top of f18-perl build tag and I get an YUM error
about
Hi.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:13:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I hereby declare this thread officially dead.
>
> Is there a Godwin's Law equivalent that applies to the invocation of
> the 'GNU/ debate'?
We could call it the 'RMS recurrence'.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
hkoba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buribul...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from hkoba
Pete Zaitcev writes:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:08:05 -0600
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> %global commit bd245c9
>>
>> Source0:
>> https://github.com/jukka/pcfi/tarball/%{commit}/jukka-pcfi-%{commit}.tar.gz
>>
>> %setup -q -n jukka-pcfi-%{commit}
>
> I do not understand how this is supposed to
Thanks to a helping guy I was able to file the last review for the
Guacamole Web Application [1]!
I need some help with a review of the RDP C library that is used by
the daemon to initiate RDP connections.
The guy who took the review dropped it after 3 weeks without actually
building the package:
63 matches
Mail list logo
