On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:41:32PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Przemek Klosowski writes:
>
> >What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft
> >hardware certification spec requiring Secure Boot?
>
> Why, all they have to do is simply pay another $99. Problem solved.
We wouldn
Corey Richardson wrote:
> How are you trying to modify the brightness?
Holding down Fn and pressing the up and down keys is supposed to adjust the
brightness. A little box is shown in the middle of the screen with a
horizontal bar that indicates the brightness. That part still works. The bar
gr
Przemek Klosowski writes:
What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
certification spec requiring Secure Boot?
Why, all they have to do is simply pay another $99. Problem solved.
So, what is the current thinking?
The current consensus seems to be that somethin
Hello guys anybody working on it if not am about to build it
http://www.sourcefabric.org/en/airtime/download/
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> > Adam Williamson writes:
> >
> >> 3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*
> >
> > Those instructions include dracut doing unspecified magic. For other
>
> The magic was quite
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:15 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > 3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*
>
> Those instructions include dracut doing unspecified magic. For other
> releases I'd agree with you and do a yum upgrade, but I must admit I
> don't dare t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.)
>
> I have retired the package in f18.
>
> I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds.
>
> Bit the rawhide build is still pulling
>
> How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.)
>
> I have retired the package in f18.
>
> I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds.
>
> But the rawhide build is still pulling the fc17 version of the package.
>
> There are no dependencies on it.
And FWIW, the latest glusterfs rpm Obso
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.)
>
> I have retired the package in f18.
>
> I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds.
>
> Bit the rawhide build is still pulling the fc17 version of the
> package.
>
> There a
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.)
>
> I have retired the package in f18.
>
> I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds.
>
> Bit the rawhide build is still pulling the fc17 version of the package.
>
> There are no dependenc
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:20:21 +0200
Björn Persson
wrote:
> After I upgraded to Fedora 17 my laptop screen is stuck on a very low
> brightness setting, which makes it very hard to read. It's OK during
> POST, Grub and early Linux initialization, but goes dim before I'm
> prompted for the disk encr
How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.)
I have retired the package in f18.
I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds.
Bit the rawhide build is still pulling the fc17 version of the package.
There are no dependencies on it.
I have googled for it, but my google fu is not good with t
commit 8e61a2aa5e6232bede07462e1159d9a1c8a2d0eb
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 7 23:30:04 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Net-OpenSSH.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-OpenSSH.spec b/perl-Net-OpenSSH.spec
index 5d015dc..a85e7
commit 6bc72240fd0cb2f8e9b0b6462c30152b9f85a9ba
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 7 23:29:34 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-CSS-Minifier.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CSS-Minifier.spec b/perl-CSS-Minifier.spec
index 4db7c13..11
commit 7fb78d62876cf4938f4ca21cb1349ff41f0cac75
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jun 7 23:29:26 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Net-SSH2.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-SSH2.spec b/perl-Net-SSH2.spec
index 911f170..08d3a1d 100644
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:30 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 21:12 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski
>>> wrote:
>>> > What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardwar
Hi,
I would like to retire PADL's nss_ldap and pam_ldap from current Rawhide.
SSSD has been the default in Fedora for quite a few releases with
nss-pam-ldapd as another option for deployments that, for some reason,
do not want to migrate to the SSSD. nss_ldap also seems to be abandoned
upstream.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 21:12 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski
>> wrote:
>> > What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
>> > certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By th
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson said:
> If there are ARM machines where UEFI and Secure Boot are available,
> we're going to have tools to do your own trust database management
> anyway, so why would supporting them be any different from doing the
> same on x86?
For Windows 8 certification on ARM,
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 21:12 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
> > What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
> > certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a way
> > to disable it on x86, but on
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 13:14 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
> certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a
> way to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it
> off. I guess
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
> certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a way
> to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it off. I
> guess the c
Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski said:
> What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
> certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a
> way to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it
> off. I guess the current Fedor
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:14:57PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft
> hardware certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec,
> there must be a way to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly
> prohibit turning it off. I gu
On 06/07/2012 01:25 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> since the upgrade to 17, I've been experiencing system freezes on frequent
> occasions when getting up from the
> computer. The term "frequent" used in this context has a different meaning
> from "constantly"; there are many moments
> when I can ge
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
> certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a way
> to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it off. I
> guess the c
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Error:
1137a7bbb94c9508a2268c467583207f Error-0.17018.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
Le Ven 1 juin 2012 18:38, Gerry Reno a écrit :
> How are you going to dual-boot:
> Windows-8 and Windows-7
> Windows-8 and Windows-XP
> Windows-8 and Windows 2008 Server
>
> Windows-8 and Fedora 16
> Windows-8 and Fedora 17
> Windows-8 and Fedora 18
vmware is going
Le Sam 2 juin 2012 14:10, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> We are all, Microsoft included, headed for signature-HELL.
>>
>> This is going to gum up the entire x86 hardware ecosystem to such a
>> point and Microsoft will rue the day they
Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) said:
> I posted about MALLOC_PERTURB_ about a year ago,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/132690
>
> but it is clear that not everyone is setting the variable, so for those
> who didn't take the time last year, or who are new to the
We're canceling tomorrow's IRC meeting. There will be a couple of
people that will be unable to attend and there aren't a lot of items to
discuss.
As always, if you have questions please feel free to email the kernel
list and we'll reply as soon as we can.
josh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
since the upgrade to 17, I've been experiencing system freezes on frequent
occasions when getting up from the computer. The term "frequent" used in
this context has a different meaning from "constantly"; there are many
moments when I can get up to accomplish other tasks, and come back to a
usable c
After I upgraded to Fedora 17 my laptop screen is stuck on a very low
brightness setting, which makes it very hard to read. It's OK during POST,
Grub and early Linux initialization, but goes dim before I'm prompted for the
disk encryption passphrase. After that I can't turn the brightness back u
What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware
certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a
way to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it
off. I guess the current Fedora/RedHat stance, as explained by Matthew
Garrett,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, William Cohen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
> the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a
> separate package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been
Hi All,
I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a separate
package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been some
comments on package in the bz, but need to get the libpfm
commit 4f6102cf164f062b33efdbf8f753b42f96875a6a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Jun 7 17:32:26 2012 +0200
conditionalize aspell
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828213
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Compose started at Thu Jun 7 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
07.06.2012 12:52, Tadej Janež написал:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 21:27 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
With regard to the packages that depend on ImageMagick that you already
updated: will you revert those commits in git
I'm unsure I known how doing that correctly.
Does it enough do just:
git revert 56
I'm going to try to get OCaml 4.00.0 beta 2 into Rawhide today.
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2012-06/msg00030.html
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/distrib/ocaml-4.00/
It's supposed to be compatible. I will rebuild as many OCaml packages
as I can over the next few days.
Rich.
--
Richar
> For example if you configure empathy you *will* use it regardless if you
> want it or not which makes one wonder how much of Gnome is truly
> integrated with that stuff.
You will use what? How will Empathy or any other GNOME component suddenly
start using it (not sure what "it" is) if you have
Devel Mailling List may also help me
Forwarded Message
On Qua, 2012-06-06 at 18:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2012, you wrote:
> > I see, that we got this active=no (or =FALSE) problem with other cases
> > like my remote server, where I need to work with
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
>
> Requires: udev
>
> is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be cleaned
> up:
>
> % repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
> --whatreq
On 06/07/2012 12:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
You are not forced to use it though;)
No shit captain obvious =)
Not using it does not mean it's not doing something and potentially
leaking/gathering what ever info from your desktop and your desktop
activates to what ever "online" server/account it c
2012/6/7 Adrian Alves :
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Vascom wrote:
>>
>> They can check this Package Review Request
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
>>
>> 2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher :
>> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am about t
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes:
>
>> The magic was quite specified. You rebuild the initramfs with the
>> convertfs module included, and pass the approriate arguments on boot.
>> There's a wiki page covering exactly that.
>
> Yes, the invokation is speci
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Vascom wrote:
> They can check this Package Review Request
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
>
> 2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher :
> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am about to package this:
> >> grive open sour
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 11:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> You may want to check with the Fedora Packaging Committee on whether
> this is an acceptable project for Fedora. I seem to recall some concern
> that packages that are only useful
On 06/07/2012 11:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
You may want to check with the Fedora Packaging Committee on whether
this is an acceptable project for Fedora. I seem to recall some concern
that packages that are only useful for communication with a non-Free
source may not be acceptable for inclu
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am about to package this:
>> grive open source client for google drive
>> http://match065.github.com/grive/
>>
>>
>> Just wondering in case if somebody else is working on it
>
They can check this Package Review Request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher :
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am about to package this:
>> grive open source client for google drive
>> http://match065.github.com/grive/
>
Hi, I need a sponsor to include this package in Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
My Self introduction
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168330.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
>
>
> Am about to package this:
> grive open source client for google drive
> http://match065.github.com/grive/
>
>
> Just wondering in case if somebody else is working on it
>
You may want to check with the Fedora Packaging Committee on
My name is Vasiliy N. Glazov
My nickname Vascom or vascom
City, Country: Moscow, Russian Federation.
Profession status: Engeneer.
Company: Javad GNSS.
I want be maintaner of packages for Fedora.
I already have few review requests for packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
htt
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 21:27 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >
> > With regard to the packages that depend on ImageMagick that you already
> > updated: will you revert those commits in git
> I'm unsure I known how doing that correctly.
> Does it enough do just:
> git revert 56e05f..HEAD
>
> or I mu
On 06/07/2012 10:33 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Yes, the invokation is specified in detail. There just isn't any
documentation of what it actually does,
I thought what convertfs does was quite clear.
If you need to know the details how it does that, take a look at
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/30conve
Josh Boyer writes:
> The magic was quite specified. You rebuild the initramfs with the
> convertfs module included, and pass the approriate arguments on boot.
> There's a wiki page covering exactly that.
Yes, the invokation is specified in detail. There just isn't any
documentation of what it a
On 06/07/2012 01:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/07/2012 05:29 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Do we really need to create a feature page for that and follow the
approval process?
Seems too heavy weight to me for effectively rebasing a package...
It is certainly not required. Feature process is a
On 06/06/2012 04:25 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
We will split out a systemd-libs subpackage to be more multilib-friendly.
Done in systemd-185-4.gita2368a3.fc18.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/07/2012 03:59 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2012-06-06 at 14:03 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd
BTW ,
we don't have an %{_initrddir} for systemd ?
There's %{_unitdir}
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
61 matches
Mail list logo
