On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:07 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> Part way down, there are directions on
>
> Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
>
> This is for web browser. This is only required for user certificates.
>
> The statement to create such a certificate is:
>
> openssl pkcs1
Hi All,
Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing from
long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it.
Google has recently released google-croscore fonts.
- These are from same vendor ascendar with OFL license and more glyph
coverage than existing lib
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-05-21
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
$MEETING_TEXT
TODO
* insert artificially cheery meeting description when not drunk
* invade Tokyo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am setting up a Koji server, and following the instructions given on the
Fedora Koji wiki
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo
Part way down, there are directions on
Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
This is fo
Hi all,
I don't have the time to take proper care of Mediatomb, so I've orphaned
the package. There are a couple of bugs open, including a crasher bug
that needs to be resolved.
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello all:
I've submitted a bunch of package submissions which need a sponsor.
I'm working with opscode ( http://www.opscode.com/ ) to package and
maintain the Chef client and its dependencies. The goal is to get
Chef into Fedora 18 (or even 17 if possible in a post-release
timeframe?) and eventu
On Sun, 20 May 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
conflicts.
I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file
As long as it gets put into th
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
> conflicts.
> I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file
As long as it gets put into the final RPM in the build process somehow.
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to
have a chang
Kevin Kofler writes:
> Remi Collet wrote:
>> For me, the %changelog "must" stay branch specific.
>> p.e, I don't want the f16 branch polluted by "mass rebuild" entry from
>> rawhide.
> You're just too pedantic about that. I stopped caring about this issue eons
> ago, even in CVS days, where I'd
Remi Collet wrote:
> For me, the %changelog "must" stay branch specific.
> p.e, I don't want the f16 branch polluted by "mass rebuild" entry from
> rawhide.
You're just too pedantic about that. I stopped caring about this issue eons
ago, even in CVS days, where I'd just "sync from devel", i.e. ov
Simo Sorce wrote:
> This is really a personal preference.
> For example I really *hate* merges, they clutter everything.
They don't clutter anything at all if they're fast-forward. If you're going
to push the same new version to all releases (as was done in the
screenshot), I see no reason not t
Rob Spanton wrote:
> rpmlint doesn't seem to be very happy about me shipping this rpm that
> contains a lot of headers. So unhappy that it tells me 454 times about
> it ;-)
Compiler toolchains are exempt from the -devel package requirement, as are
target libraries for cross-compilation (see e.g.
The "They're Having So Much Fun It's Illegal." release.
This is the end of the development cycle. We're now headed into the
stabilisation and bug fixing phase.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/12.1.0/Release_plan
Fixed bugs:
#11850 12.1.0 os10 image too large to fit on a XO-1
#11828 olpc UID has chan
Am 20.05.2012 07:02, schrieb Rob K:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:34 AM, José Matos wrote:
>
>> The total number of connections should be the same, as far as I
>> understand only the number of connections from a single host will be three.
>> Since it should be safe to assume that the downloads ar
On 05/20/2012 06:10 AM, Glen Turner wrote:
> On 19/05/12 01:04, José Matos wrote:
>
>> The total number of connections should be the same, as far as I
>> understand only the number of connections from a single host will be three.
>
> The risk is the rise in the maximum number of concurrent connec
basics-0.6.3-3.fc18
JAXB2 Basics
New package: pyshp-1.1.4-2.fc18
Pure Python read/write support for ESRI Shapefile format
New package: ratpoints-2.1.3-5.fc18
Find rational points on hyperelliptic curves
New package: sphinx-webtools-0.2.1-20120520.hg86a2eac02af
Compose started at Sun May 20 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg
18 matches
Mail list logo
