Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> writes:
> Remi Collet wrote:
>> For me, the %changelog "must" stay branch specific.
>> p.e, I don't want the f16 branch polluted by "mass rebuild" entry from
>> rawhide.
> You're just too pedantic about that. I stopped caring about this issue eons
> ago, even in CVS days, where I'd just "sync from devel", i.e. overwrite the
> branch specfile with the one from devel. And I wasn't the only one doing
> that. Everything else is just unmaintainable.
> Just keep the branches in sync. If the changelog would the only difference
> otherwise, nobody will care. (And if not, try %if 0%{?fedora} > n
> conditionals.)
[ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody
else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
