On 05/18/2012 09:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot
>> has been approved for Fedora 18.
>>
>> ===
>> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot
> has been approved for Fedora 18.
>
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
> ===
>
>
In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot has
been approved for Fedora 18.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs ar
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
> not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to
have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into %
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 12:12 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Thanks Adam,
>
>
> First cpuinfo:
>
> now meminfo, if needed,
I...no, that doesn't help. Why would it help?
Sorry for not giving more precise instructions. What we want are the
logs from anaconda. Specifically, program.log, but all o
On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
> can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git is not CVS.
>
> When you have 2 branches with identical content and history (typically
> right after
Thanks Adam,
First cpuinfo:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5250 @ 1.50GHz
stepping : 13
microcode : 0xa4
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores :
Am 18.05.2012 20:31, schrieb John Reiser:
> On 05/18/2012 08:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> why are making the connections to the SAME mirror at all?
>> it would make much more sense to download packages
>> parallel and each one from a different mirror
>
> I find that two simultaneous threads to
On 05/18/2012 09:48 AM, Rob Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain
up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump
forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works.
Excellent, thanks! are you also doing msp430-bi
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
> can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git is not CVS.
>
> When you have 2 branches with identical content and history (typically
> right after
On 05/18/2012 08:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> why are making the connections to the SAME mirror at all?
> it would make much more sense to download packages
> parallel and each one from a different mirror
I find that two simultaneous threads to the same one mirror
gives shortest time to completio
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Rob Spanton wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
> So I'd like to submit a new "msp430mcu" package for review. This
> package would almost entirely consist of headers and linker scripts.
> Since this package would be essential for cross-compiling *anything* for
> the msp430,
Le 18/05/2012 18:35, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit :
So please. Merge as long as it makes sense (i.e. unless something needs
to be changed specifically in one branch).
Sorry but, I think, in most of the case "merge" is not the solution.
For me, the %changelog "must" stay branch specific.
p.e,
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5196 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
Hi,
I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain
up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump
forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works.
There's a C library for the msp430 micro-controllers called msp430-libc.
This used to contain
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures:
cd080fa3b4aa77d1e4af61c5fd5fbd43 MooseX-Method-Signatures-0.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On 05/17/2012 06:19 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
x32 makes intel be faster Atom Z2460 [1]
I can't find any x86_64/ia32/x32 benchmarks in that article? Regardless,
I'd agree that x32 is potentially useful on heavily resource-co
I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git is not CVS.
When you have 2 branches with identical content and history (typically
right after branching or when the maintainer is updating all releases
together) then
commit 0c95d07cf0157815bc4bc765f5f6569a13ce2052
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Fri May 18 10:28:53 2012 -0600
add LICENSE, README and TODO to files
perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec b/perl-MooseX-
Am 18.05.2012 17:34, schrieb José Matos:
> On 2012-05-18 15:23, Glen Turner wrote:
>> Hi Zdenek,
>>
>> Why is the default three connections rather than one? Is a tripling of
>> the number of connections to a mirror on a Fedora release day desirable?
>> Consider that a large mirror site already se
Le 17/05/2012 18:25, Frank Murphy a écrit :
Traceback:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822632
Another taceback with latest python-urlgrabber-3.9.1-13.fc18.noarch
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
2308, in update
speed = (k1 * speed + k2 * d
Compose started at Fri May 18 08:15:02 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On 2012-05-18 15:23, Glen Turner wrote:
> Hi Zdenek,
>
> Why is the default three connections rather than one? Is a tripling of
> the number of connections to a mirror on a Fedora release day desirable?
> Consider that a large mirror site already sees concurrent connections in
> the multiple 10,000
On 17/05/12 01:37, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> - mirror limits are honored, too.
>
> Making many connections to the same mirror usually does not help much, it just
> consumes more resources. That's why Yum also uses mirror limits from
> metalink.xml. If no such limit is available, at most 3 simultane
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:17:29PM +0300, Alek Paunov wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> On 18.05.2012 15:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an
> >experiment, and I need to know what order of disk space I will need [:-)]
>
> Would you like to elaborate -
On 05/18/2012 02:17 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> On 18.05.2012 15:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an
>> experiment, and I need to know what order of disk space I will need [:-)]
>
> Would you like to elaborate - What kind of expe
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2012-05-18
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Apologies about the late notice but the next (and hopefully last)
Fedora 17 final blocker bug review meeting will be today Friday,
2012-05-18.
Hi Rich,
On 18.05.2012 15:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an
experiment, and I need to know what order of disk space I will need [:-)]
Would you like to elaborate - What kind of experiment you are preparing?
[Asking because I live with t
On 05/18/2012 01:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Does anyone have an estimate for the total size of the checked out and
> "prepped" source code (w/o binaries) in Fedora (eg. in F17)?
>
> The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an
> experiment, and I need to know what order of
Compose started at Fri May 18 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg
Does anyone have an estimate for the total size of the checked out and
"prepped" source code (w/o binaries) in Fedora (eg. in F17)?
The reason is that I want to check out all the source for an
experiment, and I need to know what order of disk space I will need [:-)]
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virt
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:16 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> TC6 won't put a boot loader in after installation.
No, really, it does.
You can pretty much assume that anything really basic in a late TC /
early RC stage like we're at now actually works, unless you see
otherwise on the blocker list. I
32 matches
Mail list logo
