Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

Hi Gang, For those of us who have let our command-line skills wane slightly, what is the command for preupgrade, if this is how it is accomplished? Thanks, Richard On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, "Michał Piotrowski" wrote: > Hi, > > W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski > napisał:

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012/4/28 Michał Piotrowski : > Hi, > > W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson > napisał: >> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200, >>>    Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> > >>> >Are there any serious known problems with

Re: intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL

On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > OK, so that confirms this happens on Lives as well as Installs, so needs to be > fixed on both. What component should I file against? My problem is explicitly with dd'ing Live-Desktop ISO to a USB stick. The ISO file passes SHA256 checksum, as

intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL

Chris Murphy colorremedies.com> writes: > I'm doing EFI booting, so I get the option to Verify and Boot from within GRUB Legacy, but I'm having the same > problem. The result is nasty. See this bug. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817262 > > And check out the attached photograph

Re: intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL

On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > What is the intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL (either on Install or Live > images)? In doing a test install in a KVM guest using the "check" boot > parameter > on an Install image, the mediacheck FAILed (which happens frequently in KVM,

intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL

What is the intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL (either on Install or Live images)? In doing a test install in a KVM guest using the "check" boot parameter on an Install image, the mediacheck FAILed (which happens frequently in KVM, although not reproducibly) but instead of at least prompting f

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> File system errors left uncorrected, failure to install along side Mac OS, >> Mactel boot >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817262 I have updated this bug. Does not occur w

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > File system errors left uncorrected, failure to install along side Mac OS, > Mactel boot > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817262 This problem is not occurring when using the LiveCD ISO burned to DVD-RW media. It's only occurring w

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Apr 28, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > This is a Radeon? We're doing something wrong in the DisplayPort setup, > and I'm trying to hunt it down - it seems to affect most modern Macs > with Radeons. Yes, both Radeon and Intel Graphics are on that mDP port. As for this: > https:

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:11:06AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Problem: Flakey reboot and poweroffs. CSM boot and installs were > lightening fast with previous FC17 builds. EFI boot reboots, after > executing command, result in a 1-2 minute hang. I can switch consoles, > but they are unrespons

Unresponsive upstream - mysqlenum

   Hi, I filed mysqlenum package for review more than a month ago. Review is stuck because the upstream is unresponsive about a licensing issue.  -> http://www.andreafabrizi.it/?mysqlenum  -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798738 What is a way out in such cases? I'm sure it must

Fan switch on permanently

Hi everyone. The "BIOS issue" discussed in mailing list some time ago ( http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/164814.html), probably was caused by *biosdevname*. I can't be sure at 100% but since i removed it (due of Bug801885

rawhide report: 20120428 changes

Compose started at Sat Apr 28 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Apr 27, 2012 11:34 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote: > Sorry Bill -- I'm confused here. Was a notification method actually > implemented? Was it enabled in F17.TC1? If so, I didn't see it. Or > was it implemented only for rawhide? It was implemented only in the sense that code was written and po

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Dual boot Mac OS 10.7 + F17, MBP4,1. Failure after partitioning/lvm/filesystem creation, and before copying live image beings. Error message: "ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/mapper/vg_f17s-lv_root: File system errors left uncorrected. " This is a 1 fail for 1 attempt, with this configur

F-17 Branched report: 20120428 changes

Compose started at Sat Apr 28 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:31:59 +1000, GG (Guido) wrote: > To go back to initial proposal of > revitalizing sponsor role, I think it would also be a good thing, > given that we leverage on new possible sponsor responsibilities > (ie, supervise new sponsorees' commits for X time after package > creati

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

| > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:50 +0200, Micha?? Piotrowski wrote: | > > | > > Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems | > > related to UsrMove (or anything else)? | > | > I made the jump via preupgrade and had quite a bit of trouble. A number | > of packages didn't g

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Apr 28, 2012, at 12:58 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > "There was an error installing the bootloader. The system may not be > bootable." System is in fact not bootable. Filed a bug with anaconda logs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817225 Could be false alarm due to me unchecki

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

Hi, W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson napisał: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200, >>    Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> > >> >Are there any serious known problems with apache, python, php, mysql, >> >postgresq

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200, >Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > >Are there any serious known problems with apache, python, php, mysql, > >postgresql? > > I am using F17 on a machine that use postgres and perl scripts (not > m

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:50 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > > Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems > > related to UsrMove (or anything else)? > > I made the jump via preupgrade and had quite a bi