Hello:
I am in the process of building my first package [1], and have got most
of it sorted. 'rpmbuild -ba' executes successfully with the current SPEC
file[3].
However, the SRPM [2] fails in Mock with the error:
RPM build errors:
File not found by glob:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python
On 03/13/2012 02:04 PM, Xibo Ning wrote:
Hi,
Do we really need a fineness c program to make symbol link? In
redhat-lsb.spec, we can see:
gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Os -static -fno-stack-protector -o
redhat_lsb_trigger{.%{_target_cpu},.c} -DLSBSOVER='"%{lsbsover}"' \
-DLDSO='"%{ldso}"' -DLSBLDSO='"/%{_li
Hi,
Do we really need a fineness c program to make symbol link? In
redhat-lsb.spec, we can see:
gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Os -static -fno-stack-protector -o
redhat_lsb_trigger{.%{_target_cpu},.c} -DLSBSOVER='"%{lsbsover}"' \
-DLDSO='"%{ldso}"' -DLSBLDSO='"/%{_lib}/%{lsbldso}"' -D_GNU_SOURCE
install
2012/3/12 Sérgio Basto
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
> > User switching between different users on X is broken.
> >
> > It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
> > same problem:
> >
> > Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hu
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Caterpillar wrote:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5730
>>
> No, what about stable updates?
look at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
its pushed into updates-testing if you add some karma it will become stable.
--
---
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I know this should most likely be directed at upstream Gnome, but would
> it be possible to redesign extensions.gnome.org so that it's... usable?
> I mean, it's a list of extensions, ten to a page, ordered by popularity,
> name or nu
* Dan Williams
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> This may be the case for the network that you or I run, but not for
>> providers. Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate
>> /64 automatically).
>
> Do they send RAs at all? If so, which (if either) of the "
* Thomas Woerner
> For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but
> not in the default zone 'public'.
>
> Should we enable dhcpv6-client in the default zone and maybe others
> also?
Hi Thomas,
In my humble opinion...
Considering that the DHCPv6 protocol is almost an exact I
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
> User switching between different users on X is broken.
>
> It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
> same problem:
>
> Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
> The switcher doesn't sho
On Mon, 12.03.12 23:04, nodata (l...@nodata.co.uk) wrote:
> User switching between different users on X is broken.
>
> It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
> same problem:
>
> Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
> The switcher d
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
> User switching between different users on X is broken.
>
> It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
> same problem:
>
> Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
> The switcher doesn't sho
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
The switcher doesn't show the correct virtual terminal. Killing the
switcher with ctrl+
Am 12.03.2012 22:49, schrieb Jesse Keating:
> Every package is different. While the subversion update required
> hand management to bring up to date, the dbmail may not have (note
> I do not know if this is true or not)
what i meant here is why the maintainer does not update to
stable release
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>
>>> the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild"
>>> on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because
>>
On 3/12/12 12:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> I'm not sure. Install the build deps needed to rebuild the f17 SRPMs?
they are NOT solveable for the available src.rpms on F16
that is why it makes me so crazy that once built and
working packages are removed in the meantime
> don't do the testing
Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild"
>> on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because
>> tessted and expected after all is running fine this was
>> pushed
Am 12.03.2012 20:33, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
He expected that it /would/ be pushed to stable.
>>>
>>> Well, yes. And I can understand that. But as you said, that's no
>>> guarantee it'll ever hit stable.
>>
>> but what should i do now a half year later
>>
>> i need subversion >= 1.7.0, this wa
Il 10/03/2012 20:29, Itamar Reis Peixoto ha scritto:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Caterpillar wrote:
>> I opened a bugreport about the nonresponsive package mantainer of emesene.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797260
>> This is the third point of procedure
>> https://fedorapr
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/285
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/285/0001-TIcket-285-compilation-fixes-for-format-security.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 18:53:16 +0100,
drago01 wrote:
>
> IANAL but I would call the odt "source code" and the pdf "binary" but
> just use the term "documentation" for either.
> It is not a binary in the sense of "compiled code".
The GPL requires you to to provide the preferred source code fo
... from (GPL+ or Artistic). All Fedora users of these packages are
GPLv2 or GPLv2+.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On the FESCo meeting today the deprecated package policy was adjusted.
We agreed on the following proposal:
Packages may be unretired without review up to 2 weeks after
retirement providing that the package has ever previously been
reviewed.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road y
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:08:24 -0500
Dan Williams wrote:
> > Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate /64 automatically).
>
> Do they send RAs at all? If so, which (if either) of the "other" and
> "managed" flags are set? If they don't, do they just expect DHCPv6 to
> be magically r
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-12)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 18:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-12/fesco.2012-03-12-18.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild"
> on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because
> tessted and expected after all is running fine this was
> pushed to stable updates long ago
Well that does not h
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
>>> wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> No, it lo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
>> wrote:
>>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
updated. I d
Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
>> wrote:
>>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
update
Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
> wrote:
>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>> No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
>>> updated. I don't see where it was ever in stable.
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedora
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 15:31 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Adam Williamson
>
> > At the meeting, we made the call that IPv6-only networks are becoming
> > a configuration sufficiently important that a serious breach of the
> > criteria in the context of an IPv6-only network is significant enough
On 12.3.2012 03:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
as duplicates of one other bug. You can
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
> wrote:
> > On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >>
> >> No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
> >> updated. I don't see where it was ever in stable.
> >>
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:22:05 -0400,
Martin Preisler wrote:
> Hi,
> I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
> GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
>
> I am not a sponsor so I c
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > > which has a lot of people tacked on as
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
> > using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
> > small networks.
>
> This
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> There will be a "GNOME Shell and Extensions" Test Day on Thursday!
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
>>
>> Here's an introduction f
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
>> > installed in the final rpm
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
>> wrote:
>> > Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
>> >> Stephen Gallagh
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
>> On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> working since many motnhs with:
>>> subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>>> subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>>>
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.o
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
> wrote:
> > Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
> >> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jone
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
> On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> working since many motnhs with:
>> subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>> subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752
>>
>> all the 1.7 packages are r
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga
> wrote:
> >
> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
> > installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should the
> > source be purg
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/271
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/271/0001-Ticket-271-Slow-shutdown-when-you-have-100-replicati.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752
all the 1.7 packages are removed for F15/F16 now
so after distro-sync to F16 downgradded t
Looks interesting, I am reviewing your package.
--
Martin Preisler
- Original Message -
> From: "Brendan Jones"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:26:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Review swap: Summoning Wars
>
> On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin Preisler wrote:
>
Summary of changes:
0b06b74... Import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
Chris Adams wrote:
> DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
> using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
> small networks.
This may be the case for the network that you or I run, but not for provider
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752
all the 1.7 packages are removed for F15/F16 now
so after distro-sync to F16 downgradded to
subversion-1.6.17-5.fc16.x86_64
and now?
WHY
Shiver me timbers!
It's time for another Beefy Test Day, Argh! Tomorrow, 13 March, is the USB 3.0
Test Day!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-13_USB_3.0
Testing is easy; just use your favourite up-to-date Fedora 17 image (Live or
Install); everything
is included! The testing wi
On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin Preisler wrote:
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you al
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you already are a Fedora
packager.
--
Martin Preisle
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc18' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc16' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc17' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc15' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el6' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el5' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Package ocaml-camlimages in Fedora devel is now owned by bruno
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-camlimages
___
ocaml-devel mailing list
ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> There will be a "GNOME Shell and Extensions" Test Day on Thursday!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
>
> Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this
> event from QA per
Summary of changes:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 03/12/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
With zone support in firewalld I'd like to start a discussion on the zones
that should enable DHCPv6 client support.
For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but not in
the default zo
On 03/12/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
With zone support in firewalld I'd like to start a discussion on the
zones that should enable DHCPv6 client support.
For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but not
in the default zone 'public'.
Should we enable dhcpv6-clie
There will be a "GNOME Shell and Extensions" Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this event from
QA perspective:
While Fedora 17 Test Day cycle is starting to take spe
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't
> > > handle
> > > the other 60 thoug
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
IIRC, Office Communicator broke with this update when I tried to use the
Pidgin plugin. Better send in the patch to Microsoft, too.
Ah, yes, here it is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770682
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
Elio Maldonado wrote:
If you can, could you set the
SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV SSL option to PR_TRUE and try it and send us feedback on
remaining sites or apps that syill break?
IIRC, Office Communicator broke with this update when I tried to use the
Pidgin plugin. Better send in the patch to Microsof
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:47:36 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
I have filed the following ticket for this issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5124
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On 03/10/2012 03:31 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
Regarding this bug in particular, I'll just note that it there is
already a precedent. In a default Fedora installation, traffic to the
DHCPv4 client (which is the same binary as the DHCPv6 client) is allowed
from the entire internet. From a security
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
8a38d45faa630f27292e84c99f3c411b Hash-MultiValue-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a
> > > non-free
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> > (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
> > been used for local builds (no scratch-builds).
Summary of changes:
03c2751... Update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
(noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove
this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so ho
commit 6b30f5eee8e32a60cefeeceb82e5b547d245d6eb
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Mar 12 05:50:49 2012 -0600
update to 0.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Path-Tiny.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:46:03 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> (noncom
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #699 Proposal to remove the pa
78 matches
Mail list logo
