On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 20:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
> > meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
> > FESCo ticket also) so everyone's
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 20:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
> meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
> FESCo ticket also) so everyone's aware and can raise objections if they
> wish.
>
> The bug unde
Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
FESCo ticket also) so everyone's aware and can raise objections if they
wish.
The bug under discussion was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591630 .
On 3/9/12 10:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/muparser/muparser_v2_2_2.zip
>
> Thanks! I could have sworn that I tried that one, but I guess I must have
> screwed it up somehow.
When all else fails, there is always the documentation ;)
(of co
Orion Poplawski wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/muparser/muparser_v2_2_2.zip
Thanks! I could have sworn that I tried that one, but I guess I must
have screwed it up somehow.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/09/2012 08:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
In the process of updating the muParser package to the latest upstream
release, I am unable to construct a proper Sourceforge URL for the
upstream release that meets the Fedora packaging guideline. Can someone
more expert about Sourceforge URLs please giv
Eric Smith writes:
I'm probably doing something dumb, but I can't seem to get that file from
any variant of a download.sourceforge.net URL that I've tried, using
different variations of the case of the P in the project name, etc.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/muparser/muparser/Ve
In the process of updating the muParser package to the latest upstream
release, I am unable to construct a proper Sourceforge URL for the
upstream release that meets the Fedora packaging guideline. Can someone
more expert about Sourceforge URLs please give me a hand?
The file I want is mupars
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:03 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> When's the last time this has been confirmed to work?
It always worked, for example for:
Fedora-16-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
It crashes even with /usr/bin/X and xorg-x11-drv-vmware-11.0.3-13.fc17.x86_64
(not just in the installer):
Hi.
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:58:16 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote
> Confirming:
> /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -cdrom Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-DVD.iso -boot d -m
> 2048 -vga vmware fails to initialize X and falls back to text.
>
> It works with any of -vga cirrus/std/qxl. I have not found Anaconda
> Bug for it, i
* Mattia Verga [09/03/2012 23:26] :
>
> why
> bugzilla should accept to create bugs for unmaintained versions? Is
> there a logic that I cannot see, or it could be a thing to tweak?
Bugzilla did not have the ability to retire versions un
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:15:07 +0530
Buddhike Kurera wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Anuj More
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was thinking of porting something like AUR (Arch User Repository)
> > to Fedora. I have blogged about it, and any feedback about the
> > feasibility, technical issu
Hello,
I was looking into bugzilla and I'm wondering why there are open bugs
for old and no more maintained Fedora versions ( F < 14).
The most part of them are automatically created by ABRT, but why
bugzilla should accept to create bugs for unmaintained versions? Is
there a logic that I cann
Hello,
I have submitted the application[1] on-behalf the Fedora project for GSoC 2012.
Thanks for supporting and volunteering to mentor the ideas[2].
Please feel free to explore the GSoC portal in Fedora wiki[3] and the
use the Talk: page for discussions.
The selected organizations list will be p
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Yes, exactly, and that is what I'm suggesting. For printing entirely in
> the user session it is a case of using an alternative to using CUPS
> running on the local machine, so that means:
>
> a) no filters or drivers; the job document is the PD
On 03/09/2012 11:00, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, David Quigley
wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmar
Summary of changes:
ab75957... Update to 0.0504 (*)
69c4f9e... Run the release tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, David Quigley wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>>
>> On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
>>>
On 03/09/2012 12:53 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
I've got a lot of messages like this:
Mar 9 07:31:49 nbecker1 dbus-daemon[987]: ** (upowerd:1208): WARNING **:
Property get or set does not have an interface string as first arg
Seems to be KDE specific see bug 743344 ...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-constant-boolean-0.02-5.el6' was created pointing to:
e708c4f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
On 03/09/2012 08:42, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as
'complete'
long be
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:19 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not sure how useful 'time' is as a benchmark for file copies.
Don't file transfers get cached and return to a console as 'complete'
long before the data is ever written, sometimes?
I'm pr
I've got a lot of messages like this:
Mar 9 07:31:49 nbecker1 dbus-daemon[987]: ** (upowerd:1208): WARNING **:
Property get or set does not have an interface string as first arg
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > If a provenpackager could help me, please, I'd like to retire buoh in
> > master and f17 (if possible).
>
> Done. All that's left for you to do is to file a rel-eng ticket to get
> the pack
- Original Message -
> From: "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:58:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
>
> Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (2012-03-08 23:11:26)
> >On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 A
On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
it.
Jonathan
And it appears that I can't co
Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (2012-03-08 23:11:26)
>On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
>wrote:
>> - Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions
>>have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps
>
>Is there already a separate set of java guidelines fo
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 09:52 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> 2012/3/8 Miloslav Trmač :
> > The lazy answer to both is "fail, or not, the same way as cups
> > currently fails, or not" (in fact, could the session printing service
> > simply be cups that treats the system instance as another remote
> > ser
As smb4k is a KDE Platform based app, I can also help with review,
just we will have to find a sponsor.
Also please go through the current packaging guidelines as Michael
already pointed you to it.
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:46:58 +, SB (Sérgio) wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
> I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
> The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
> review , or is already r
On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>
> if your file system places data inefficiently on disk/storage, you want
> to measure this, too. If you're comparing file system speed, I think,
> you should measure the whole thing and be sure to create comparable
> data.
The source files
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
> retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
> it.
>
> Jonathan
And it appears that I can't commit my changes in git. I'm assuming it'
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:43 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 02/03/2012 alle 14.41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto:
> > I've orphaned buoh and libsoup22 in all active branches of Fedora. Buoh
> > is a GTK online comics reader that I haven't used in forever and
> > libsoup22 is a co
33 matches
Mail list logo
