Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

On 03/05/2012 08:14 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote: On 03/05/2012 07:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey, I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion

Re: Review swap: logkeys - Linux keylogger

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 00:35 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Ankur Sinha wrote: > > The package is required for Fedora videos[1] :) > > > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Video > > How does a keylogger help you upload videos to the Internet Archive? > > Björn Persson Will assist in the creation

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:35:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> passwd keeps complaining "The password fails the dictionary check - >> it is too simplistic" for fake words NOT in the dictionary but >> otherwise too simple for passwd's approval s

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:35:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > passwd keeps complaining "The password fails the dictionary check - > it is too simplistic" for fake words NOT in the dictionary but > otherwise too simple for passwd's approval system. I think you can just ignore passwd's warning in

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

passwd keeps complaining "The password fails the dictionary check - it is too simplistic" for fake words NOT in the dictionary but otherwise too simple for passwd's approval system. I'm using the F17 alpha LiveCD and I'm just testing. I want a SIMPLE password and it won't let me use anything I

Re: Package Review Request: python-picloud

> Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the situation > happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will have much bigger > problems than running sed on all .spec files. I am sorry but this will hit even if you don't use macro when tools are not in $PATH, unless you use fu

Self Introduction

Hello there, My name is Osier Yang, and I'm willing to be a Co-maitainer of libvirt project. Let me introduce myself briefly. I am a Software Engineer in Red Hat's Virtualization team, and the project I'm working on is libvirt, (yes, the one I want to build packages for). I joined in Redhat more

Re: Orphaning a couple of packages

Fabian Deutsch wrote: because I no longer use them I am orpahning dbh muParser scidavis I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not yet having figured out how to make Meshlab build properly with GCC 4.7, so I'm waiting for upstream on that), so if anyone with better

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Yes. I'm mostly working on the netinst isos, and right now if you take > that and dd it onto a USB stick, then insert that and hold down alt on > boot, you'll get a Mac install. OK so color me extremely confused. Starting with a zero'd USB

Re: Package Review Request: python-picloud

>> mkdir -p >>cp -p ... It will be good if you make use of macro like %{__cp} Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the situation happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will have much bigger problems than running sed on all .spec files. Use just plain Unix com

Detecting Postgres version during build

I am trying to build a package that provides a Postegres cartridge compatible with 8.x and 9.x. Unfortunately the cartridge related files are not installed in the same path for both version so I am looking for a way to query the version against I'm building and pick the correct path. Is there any

Re: Review swap: logkeys - Linux keylogger

Ankur Sinha wrote: > The package is required for Fedora videos[1] :) > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Video How does a keylogger help you upload videos to the Internet Archive? Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@l

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > But then, we already 'invalidate upstream documentation for Fedora > users' by renaming all the command-line tools from 'grub-foo' to > 'grub2-foo'. Indeed, I lost about 47 brain cells on this issue alone. (By no means is it the winner for

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:37 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - > > it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. > > It's what upstream uses. See > http:/

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 15:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Depends. What if what's being added is a remote printer, that's merely > a way to smuggle documents out of a company? So direct attach printers > are probably fair game for adding without authentication. The user > clearly has physical acces

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 14:07 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:42 -0600, Greg Swift wrote: > > > I experience a similar scenario. On my home system (f16) I have my > > > wife and both in the wheel group. Every time I go to run > > > virt-manager > > > I get prompted for her

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

W dniu 5 marca 2012 21:40 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/5 Lars Seipel : >> On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - >>> it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. >> >>

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012/3/5 Lars Seipel : > On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - >> it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. > > It's what upstream uses. See > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012/3/5 Bill Nottingham : > Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said: >> I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I >> checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read >> /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I >> found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

On Monday 05 March 2012 21:20:12 Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - > it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. It's what upstream uses. See http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#Simple-configuration

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said: > I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I > checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read > /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I > found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GR

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012/3/5 Michał Piotrowski : > So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. > I found file: > /etc/default/grub > > Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - > it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. I run Grub2 from upstream and the file is /usr/

/etc/default in Fedora

Hi, I wanted to add "selinux=0" to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/gru

[389-devel] please review ticket #191 - Implement SO_KEEPALIVE on network calls

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/191 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/191/0001-Ticket-191-Implement-SO_KEEPALIVE-in-network-calls.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Summary & minutes for today's FESCo meeting (5 March 2012)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-05) === Meeting started by notting at 17:59:59 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-05/fesco.2012-03-05-17.59.log.html . Meeting summary ---

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie >> not had a successful build in F-15 or later) > > It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don't have bugs blocking that,

Re: Bodhi problems?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We may have tracked this down to a new app server that only had 1 vcpu. > (It was thus getting bogged down and not processing as normal). > We have that app server all fixed up now. > > Can anyone who sees this problem again let us know? > (Eith

Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

On 03/05/2012 07:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey, I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze that everybody hates, we decided to post

Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:09:21 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > if you are working the whole month on a different component > and give no single feedback to a new reported bug you are > ending in frustrated submitters - if they get a "assigned" > they do not feel ignored This is going to end in counte

Re: Making PGP distribution key well-known

On 2012-03-05, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Would you be willing to file a websites ticket on this?=20 Done: -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: User session printing

Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) said: > For things like cloud printing, where the print server is a hosted > service somewhere out in the Internet, I think the applications should > be talking directly to it (via the print dialog). > > For a plain network printer, where the printer might not be abl

Re: Bodhi problems?

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:46:15 -0500 (EST) Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > Two questions: > > Is bodhi down? Did I miss some down-time message? > > Am I the only one to experience this issue? > > I've seen this too. Doing fedpkg update seems to fail for me the

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie > not had a successful build in F-15 or later) It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don't have bugs blocking that, they won't get picked up. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@

Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Hey, > > I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process > at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze > that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to

[perl-Sub-Identify] Spec clean-up

commit edac6fde7a1291e8c7b2c9eae180889b035f18f1 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Mon Mar 5 15:51:28 2012 + Spec clean-up - Use %{optflags} - BR: perl(Exporter) and perl(Test::Pod) - Make %files list more explicit - Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT - No need t

Re: Bodhi problems?

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Gilboa Davara wrote: Two questions: Is bodhi down? Did I miss some down-time message? Am I the only one to experience this issue? I've seen this too. Doing fedpkg update seems to fail for me the first time, then succeed on the second time. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@

Fedora 18 feature processing?

Hey, I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F

Re: Review swap: logkeys - Linux keylogger

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 08:18 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review: > > I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain > more? > The package

Re: Draft schedule for today's FESCo meeting (5 March 2012)

On 03/05/2012 04:19 PM, Scott Doty wrote: > On 03/05/2012 06:44 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to >> this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, >> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting,

Re: Draft schedule for today's FESCo meeting (5 March 2012)

On 03/05/2012 06:44 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics m

Re: Review swap: logkeys - Linux keylogger

On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hey folks, A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review: I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain more? -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: Package Review Request: python-picloud

I am not reviewer but I think it make sense following things are good to incorporate >># These packages are not require for python >=2.6 but required for python = 2.5 >>Requires: python >= 2.5 I think your Requires: must be python = 2.5 >>%setup -q -n cloud-%version is that version shoul

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: Yes, it's a policy. Also see this bug which I filed nearly two years ago on just this subject: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711 Tim. */ New bug report filed: "security policy: root password needed when it shouldn't be". htt

Draft schedule for today's FESCo meeting (5 March 2012)

Apologies for the late sending. Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = New business = #topic #812

Re: Making PGP distribution key well-known

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:37:47 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > Put them right next to shiny Download links. If the datails about size > are important enough, a link to signature could be there too. Like: > > Download Now! > 605MB, ISO format image for Intel-compatible PCs (32-bit), signature > > W

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:44:34 +, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > Well I take back some of what I said before. In the new version > (4.0.1) the cut-and-paste C code for reading and writing images has > been replaced with use of the appropriate libraries (libpng, libjpeg, > libungif, free

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:17:21AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:03:09 +, > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > ocaml-camlimages? I've kicked this package out of Fedora because > > camlimages has a dead upstream *and* a lengthy history of security > > bugs. It

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

Hi Rich, On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +, >>   Peter Robinson wrote: >> > freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12 >> >> Note that freetennis is waiting on a review of ocaml-cal

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:03:09 +, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > ocaml-camlimages? I've kicked this package out of Fedora because > camlimages has a dead upstream *and* a lengthy history of security > bugs. It contains old C code pasted from various places, and really > shouldn't be us

[Bug 247250] Conflicting Provides

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247250 --- Comment #4 from Jan Kaluža 2012-03-05 08:05:00 EST --- Created attachment 567603 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +, > Peter Robinson wrote: > > freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12 > > Note that freetennis is waiting on a review of ocaml-calimages. I have tested > rebuilding freetennis against my local copy of ocam

User session printing

(changing the subject line since this is a bit different from the original topic) On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 00:22 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Another way to look at this issue is - if printers were maintained > per-user (per-user, unprivileged cups daemon, per-user configuration, > per-user print q

[perl-Package-DeprecationManager] Created tag perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.12-1.fc18

The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.12-1.fc18' was created pointing to: da2d63d... Update to 0.12 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

[perl-Package-DeprecationManager] Created tag perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.12-1.fc17

The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.12-1.fc17' was created pointing to: da2d63d... Update to 0.12 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 18:21:43 -0600 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +, > Peter Robinson wrote: > > leonidas-backgrounds-11.0.0-2.fc12 > > This one just had an extra newline in the sources file and I have > started new builds for f17 and f18. I push the f17 build to

File Package-DeprecationManager-0.12.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-DeprecationManager: 5f7f21db151fa7f19c10cb6009a735d4 Package-DeprecationManager-0.12.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: Making PGP distribution key well-known

On 05/03/12 10:37, Petr Pisar wrote: Even bellow export regulations which nobody reads. I do. -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Making PGP distribution key well-known

On 2012-03-02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:53:35 + (UTC) > Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On 2012-03-01, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> > Dne 1.3.2012 17:52, Petr Pisar napsal(a): >> >> where to get public key for verifying RPM signatures. >> > >> > The keys are at: https://fedoraproject.or

F-17 Branched report: 20120305 changes

Compose started at Mon Mar 5 08:15:08 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

Re: F17 x86_64 composes

> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:37:50 -0600 > Mike Chambers wrote: > > > Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no > > boot.iso > > or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile? > > Well, it's going to stay that way until the bug that prevents it > working is fixed. :) >

Re: HEAD UPS : libmemcached soname bump - Update F17 ?

Le 03/03/2012 15:40, Remi Collet a écrit : > If nobody against, I will do the update in F17 next monday. > (with a long buildroot overide for gearmand, which already have some > broken dependencies) Done: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-1.0.4-1.fc17 -- devel mailing list de