Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:57:33 -0600,
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> looks like something in X packaging changed or didnt work as expected
>
> That was fixed this morning. I have already tried out the updates and
> they seem to work fine.
>
> openjpeg's soname bump
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:57:33 -0600,
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> looks like something in X packaging changed or didnt work as expected
That was fixed this morning. I have already tried out the updates and
they seem to work fine.
openjpeg's soname bump might also cause problems. It is blockin
El Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:40:45 -0600
Mike Chambers escribió:
> On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 10:06 +, Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Sat Feb 11 08:15:07 UTC 2012
>
> Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't
> mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be install
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> I'm planning for orphan ldtp, there's only one bug against it and that's
> that it should be migrated to noarch since its written in pure python
> these days. The current version of the package in the repo is a couple
> versions out of date an
On 02/11/2012 07:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/11/2012 09:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's a bug in rpmbuild's file classification rules, should be fixed in
this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1504
While this obviously isn't fault of tecnoballz, a rebuild is
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Saturday, February 11, 2012 11:32:09 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:42:53AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 06, 2012 09:31:50 AM Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > > Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made
On 02/11/2012 09:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's a bug in rpmbuild's file classification rules, should be fixed in
this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1504
While this obviously isn't fault of tecnoballz, a rebuild is needed to
correct the dependencies.
- Panu -
>> What do you mean, exactly, by "can the tree be installed against"?
> Install against via nfs/http/ftp but there are no images dir with the
> netinstall.iso or whatever to do a quick cd or anything. I don't create
> images as I just make quick boot cd from the boot.iso.
When pungi succeeds, th
On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:
$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 11:32:09 AM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:42:53AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Monday, February 06, 2012 09:31:50 AM Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more
> > > packages that need t
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:42:53AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday, February 06, 2012 09:31:50 AM Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more
> > packages that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was
> > successful.
> >
> > Ple
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 07:40 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't
> > mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be
> > soon?
>
> Yesterday (Friday) using pungi-2.10-1.fc17 I built an anaconda install DVD
> of
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi all,
> a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
>
> After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
> libraries:
>
> $ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> conf
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:00:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> I always try out packages first via easy_install or pip (after checking they
> are
> not already available via yum).
>
> Yes, I could try things via virtualenv, but I'm just not in that habit - and
> I
> suspect many others are
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:52:08PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> b) distutils v. setuptools conflict is just an unfortunate testimony
> of immature bad state of the Python upstream packaging, but it seems
> to me that generally Python world is moving towards setuptools.
> Shouldn't we follow the suite
On Monday, February 06, 2012 09:31:50 AM Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more
> packages that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was
> successful.
>
> Please note again, that soname has been bumped to 1.9.1 and license is
> cha
> Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't
> mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be
> soon?
Yesterday (Friday) using pungi-2.10-1.fc17 I built an anaconda install DVD
of f17-branched. This effectively mirrors the tree into /var/cache/p
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 10:06 +, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sat Feb 11 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Is the tree installable yet (I yet to see images dir and such)? Don't
mean is an ISO built, but can the tree be installed against or will be
soon?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best
fre 2012-02-10 klockan 11:38 -0500 skrev Neal Becker:
> 80 wrote:
> > Never use pip outside an isolated environment (use virtualenv)
> >
> > H.
>
> Really? This is the only answer?
Does it help if we add that virtualenv is really useful? You can use it
to install a completely new copy of an a
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 10.2.2012 18:09, 80 wrote:
>> Python guidelines recommends that packagers installs python eggs using
>> distutils (python setup.py install as recommended in guidelines) while
>> pip use the same install method as easy_install (provided by
>> setuptools/distribute). The forme
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:
$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16
hicolor-icon-the
On 10.2.2012 18:09, 80 wrote:
Python guidelines recommends that packagers installs python eggs using
distutils (python setup.py install as recommended in guidelines) while
pip use the same install method as easy_install (provided by
setuptools/distribute). The former one install egg metadata as a
Am 11.02.2012 00:12 schrieb "Chuck Anderson" :
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:39:47AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > So one idea would be that a specific FESCo member needs to step
up to
> > be the "collaboration guide" (Must think of a better name for that :-)
for
> > a feature. They would
Hi all,
I have a dream ... that one day we will have a Fedora Audio spin. At the
moment most Fedora audio users rely heavily on the Planet CCRMA
repository for many of their audio packages. Fernando has has spent
countless hours maintaining this repository (thanks!) but If any kind of
Studio/
24 matches
Mail list logo
