Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Hi all, > a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544 > > After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed > libraries: > > $ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz > /bin/sh > /bin/sh > config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16 > hicolor-icon-theme > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Is %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/tecnoballz marked as executable after the %install
step? I have found that RPMbuild doesn't pick up dependencies from shared
libraries if they don't have the execute privilege bits set. Presumably that
goes for executables too. It would be strange though if GCC doesn't mark the
executable as executable.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
