On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 04:24 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially
> > if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have
> > been
> > un
Hi!
gsoap was updated to version 2.8.7 in F17 and rawhide.
Due to changes to the struct soap the soname of the libraries was bumped
from 1 to 2. Dependent packages needs to rebuild:
lcgdm
lcgdm-dav
srm-ifce
voms
Mattias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:49:13AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.02.2012 01:44, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> >> This is how software development works.
> >
> > the with every release worser overall-quality shows
> > clearly that software development does NOT work this
> > way over the long
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially
> if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have been
> unapproved, not only for F17, but forever.
So, just to be clear, you're say
tdom is picked up by me for Fedora (not EPEL).
For EPEL tdom is orphant but not in drop list *still*.
> Can I pick up tdom?
>
>
> Takanori
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:19:53 +0900,
Takanori MATSUURA wrote:
> Can I pick up tdom?
Once packages have been blocked the procedure is to require a review
similar to getting a new package into Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
It appears that gcc-gfortran-4.7.0-0.11.fc17.x86_64 (in rawhide) and
gcc-gfortran-4.7.0-0.12.fc17.x86_64 (in f17 - branching fun!) produces
and uses Fortran modules version 9 as I'm getting this trying to rebuild
netcdf:
use mpi
1
Fatal Error: Wrong module version '8' (expected '9') fo
Can I pick up tdom?
Takanori
2012/2/2 :
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17
> Orphan tdom
> Removing: tdom
> mcu8051ide requires tdom = 0.8.2-8.fc17
> tkabber requires tdom = 0.8.2-8.fc17
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Sorry I'm late on this, but is it still possible for me to pick up
python-ZSI?
Regards,
Tim
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:49:48 -0500
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> (comaintainers bcc'd)
>
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 17.
>
> New
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:24:45 -0600
Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:45 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make
> > sure that you build things for Fedora 17 from the f17 branch,
> > master is now for Fedora 18.
>
> So when
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Any feature that is invasive and intended for Fedora 18 should be
> landing ASAP now.
Just to preempt any possible misunderstandings: Any feature that is invasive
should be landing ASAP now IN F18 RAWHIDE ONLY, *NOT* IN THE F17 BRANCH! It
is TOO LATE for invasive features
Adam Williamson wrote:
> /usr move went through the entire feature process, which is exactly how
> features are supposed to get 'broader fedora engagement'. If you're
> interested in (or concerned about) new features, the feature process
> provides an awful lot of opportunities for you to raise tho
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Personally, I think f16 was a very stable boring release.
> There were rough spots, but there always are.
I'm still pretty sure we are doing better introducing subsystem
transitions now than the pain of the initial udev transition way back
in t
Am 09.02.2012 02:01, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:13 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> to say it in other words:
>>
>> the overall release-quality of fedora was MUCH better as long
>> Redhat controlled it and before everybody could propose hughe
>> changes in all sorts of su
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:13 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> to say it in other words:
>
> the overall release-quality of fedora was MUCH better as long
> Redhat controlled it and before everybody could propose hughe
> changes in all sorts of subsystems as long he finds some
> peopole agree and not
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/84
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/84/0001-Trac-Ticket-84-389-Directory-Server-Unnecessary-Chec.patch
Fix description: txn_checkpoint was always called with DB_FORCE flag.
This patch introduces db_force arg to dblayer_txn_checkpoint and
DB_F
Am 09.02.2012 01:44, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> This is how software development works.
>
> the with every release worser overall-quality shows
> clearly that software development does NOT work this
> way over the long
>
> seeing how dramatically the release quality of many
> opensource software
Am 09.02.2012 01:36, schrieb Jesse Keating:
> On 2/8/12 4:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> it is a very good idea because the overall quality of fedora would
>> be improved if there would be a larger release-blocking to get
>> the big changes fixed BEFORE alpha and in the meantime not involved
>> m
On 2/8/12 4:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is a very good idea because the overall quality of fedora would
be improved if there would be a larger release-blocking to get
the big changes fixed BEFORE alpha and in the meantime not involved
maintainers could proceed fixing the tons of small bugs and
Am 09.02.2012 01:23, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> Our experience, though, is that this is entirely the wrong way to do things.
> The problem is that life is rarely so neat: you don't get an orderly
> succession
> of Big Scary Bugs popping up one at a time for you to shoot down.
there are enough
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>Am 08.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
"The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
Publicly release installable media versions
Am 08.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
>>>
>>>Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete
>>> test
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 04:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 04:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > I personally would likely be opposed to such a change, just on the
> > grounds (as stated earlier) that we really can't get too strict at Alpha
> > stage. Remember, people always wa
On 02/09/2012 04:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I personally would likely be opposed to such a change, just on the
> grounds (as stated earlier) that we really can't get too strict at Alpha
> stage. Remember, people always want us to stop slipping releases, and
> the slips quite often happen a
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 03:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > As the release criteria put it -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_Release_Criteria:
> >
> > "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
> >
> > Publicly release
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:31 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> >> And in this scope. Inability to upgrade would be such a Beta blocker,
> >> methinks.
> >
> > Sure. But the above doesn't m
On 2/8/2012 4:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 02:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As far
>> as things-that-are-actually-QA are concerned: we mostly go by the
>> release validation process, and per the criteria, upgrades have to work
>> by Beta, not Alpha. '
>
> Any particular reason f
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> And in this scope. Inability to upgrade would be such a Beta blocker,
>> methinks.
>
> Sure. But the above doesn't mean that beta and final blockers should be
> *fixed* in Alpha (obv
On 02/09/2012 03:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As the release criteria put it -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_Release_Criteria:
>
> "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
>
> Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete
> test release
> Tes
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
> >
> >Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete
> > test release
> >Test accepted features of Fedora 17
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
>
> Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete
> test release
> Test accepted features of Fedora 17
> Identify as many F17Beta blocker bugs as possible
> Identi
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 02/09/2012 02:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > As far
> > > as things-that-are-actually-QA are concerned: we mostly go by the
> > > release validation process, and per the c
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 03:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 02:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As far
> > as things-that-are-actually-QA are concerned: we mostly go by the
> > release validation process, and per the criteria, upgrades have to work
> > by Beta, not Alpha. '
>
> Any pa
On 02/09/2012 02:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As far
> as things-that-are-actually-QA are concerned: we mostly go by the
> release validation process, and per the criteria, upgrades have to work
> by Beta, not Alpha. '
Any particular reason for this? I think it makes sense to ensure
upgrades wo
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:20 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Now it's quite possible that if QA doesn't care whether anaconda upgrades
> work until beta that the feature policy could stand to be rewritten here.
> Perhaps we could say that Features do not need to be testable in the upgrade
> scenari
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:07:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 11:03 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > > > If the anaconda support for UsrMove is not merged (and maybe not even
> > > > written?), then why was an untestable and incomplete feature merged?
> > >
> > > Wel
Summary of changes:
7fba86a... Update to 0.14 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit 7fba86ad86b98fcce0dc5cdfb018b062bb90a2f0
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:26:28 2012 +
Update to 0.14
- New upstream release 0.14:
- Use Module::Implementation to handle loading the XS or PP versions of
the
code; using this module fixes a few bugs
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
dcae0c8fef65ec193cfafc0f624c4be4 Class-Load-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> At this point we're talking about the (first) feature freeze, not the
> final release. The question is whether there's a violation of the
> feature process if anaconda doesn't have support for usrmove *right
> now*, not whether there's a problem if it does
On 02/07/2012 10:16 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> Is anyone up for a review swap? I need a review for lrslib:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752.
>
> Thanks,
I'll bite. I have two, take your pick:
ibutils - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773485
ibsim - https://bugzill
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 11:03 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > If the anaconda support for UsrMove is not merged (and maybe not even
> > > written?), then why was an untestable and incomplete feature merged?
> >
> > Well, it becomes a semantic argument. You can, after all, install with
> > the /
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:53:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 08:11 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Stijn Hoop said:
> > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:37:33 +0100
> > > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > Note that this has not actual
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Auto:
baa0907e5c79c0bf8c91cfe8b56577de Config-Auto-0.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/27
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/27/0001-Trac-Ticket-27-SASL-PLAIN-binds-do-not-work.patch
Thanks to Rich for his comment. Fixed the code based upon his suggestions.
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On 02/07/2012 11:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Again, citing FHS:
>> "Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not
>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Arguably, anaconda support for the
> feature is not part of the feature.
... mostly because the "Scope" section of the feature doesn't contain
any information about the scope.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 07:59 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet, so if
> >> you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode horribly. The
> >> bug reques
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 08:11 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stijn Hoop said:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:37:33 +0100
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet,
> > > > so if you do an anaconda upgrade
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 06:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet, so if
> > you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode horribly. The
> > bug requesting this support be added to anaconda is
> > http://b
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet, so if
> > you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode horribly.
>
> So the instructions here:
> http://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788632
If you middle click on any scrolling window, then (even some time
later) use the track pad two-finger thing to scroll down, the window
will "jump up" as if PgUp has been pressed. It's incredibly annoying
and makes things like browsing results li
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mer 8 février 2012 12:17, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >
> > After updating everything on my laptop to Rawhide (forced to by
> > usrmove) I noticed that emacs was no longer responding to
> > Control-Space for setting the mar
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:45 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make sure
> that you build things for Fedora 17 from the f17 branch, master is now
> for Fedora 18.
So when can we see the actual F17 dir on site/mirrors so we can start
mirrorin
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 7:05:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Does the X server in Rawhide eat Control-Space?
>
>
> Le Mer 8 février 2012 12:17, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >
> > Aft
Le Mer 8 février 2012 12:17, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>
> After updating everything on my laptop to Rawhide (forced to by
> usrmove) I noticed that emacs was no longer responding to
> Control-Space for setting the mark.
>
> It seems like the X server itself is eating this key combination,
> si
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788123
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-08
10:24:10 EST ---
perl-Module-Runtime-0.011-3.el6 has been submitted as an u
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> There seems to have been a recent pattern (last year or so) of pushing
> premature pet projects rapidly without broader fedora engagement.
>
> I know this little issue will get sorted out and its still
> rawhide/pre-f17. But its part of
commit 3c757262c8720ade83f50e3b894bb65fc1bea4ea
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Feb 8 14:14:30 2012 +
Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
- Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
- Add back buildroot definition and cleaning
- Ad
Am 08.02.2012 15:11, schrieb Chris Adams:
>>> criteria! This affects both the DVD upgrades and preupgrade, which
>>> are the 2 upgrade methods Fedora claims to support.
>>
>> I did not see a release yet, where did you find it?
>
> He said "release criteria". Included in that is the Feature Free
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Install-0.925-1.el5' was created pointing to:
18019c8... Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Install-0.925-1.el4' was created pointing to:
6ccdd8c... Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:59:39AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> For many of us its a bad trend to see - and creates an impression that
> a few pushy folks are wresting control - rather than things being
> accepted based on merit and good work.
Things happen in Fedora because people work on t
Once upon a time, Stijn Hoop said:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:37:33 +0100
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet,
> > > so if you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode
> > > horribly. The bug requesting
commit 6ccdd8cd8c7a3ce0c3502eb75db1ea1ef627617a
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Feb 8 14:01:22 2012 +
Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
- Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
- Fix License
- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
- BR: perl(Test::Output) for extra test cover
The lightweight tag 'perl-Params-Classify-0.013-5.el6' was created pointing to:
cb20467... Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
commit 18019c8e5a0ca91255106d52046250bf0be2d84f
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:50:16 2012 +
Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
- Update to 0.925 (packaging changes)
- Fix License
- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
- BR: perl(Test::Output) for extra test cover
Summary of changes:
cb20467... Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec
commit cb20467ae8130389edf1fa18b661a8808d5d2a08
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:44:49 2012 +
Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
- Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
- Add back buildroot definition and cleaning
- Make
We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make sure
that you build things for Fedora 17 from the f17 branch, master is now
for Fedora 18.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule We have the Alpha
Change Freeze On Feb 14th this means that we will land f17-candidate
bui
On 02/08/2012 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet, so if
>> you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode horribly. The
>> bug requesting this support be added to anaconda is
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.
Package perl-Sub-Install in Fedora EPEL 4 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Install
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj
Package perl-Sub-Install in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Install
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788531
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Summary of changes:
dd63f33... 0.22 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
commit dd63f3386b6d371495059860d3c6396a52d12c59
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:42:19 2012 +0100
0.22 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Pod-Coverage.spec | 48 ++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 32 insertio
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Coverage:
6cf04053968db85c355a740ab170aaf5 Pod-Coverage-0.22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788123
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788531
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:56:56AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Currently in Rawhide it's impossible to update to the latest udev if
> you have nfs-utils installed, because:
>
> Error: Package: 1:nfs-utils-1.2.5-11.fc17.x86_64 (@rawhide)
>Requires: modutils >= 2.4.26-9
>
Currently in Rawhide it's impossible to update to the latest udev if
you have nfs-utils installed, because:
Error: Package: 1:nfs-utils-1.2.5-11.fc17.x86_64 (@rawhide)
Requires: modutils >= 2.4.26-9
Removing: module-init-tools-3.16-5.fc17.x86_64 (@rawhide)
mo
Summary of changes:
8d11321... Add Cairo::GObject BR for tests (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
Summary of changes:
98d6e5d... Add Cairo::GObject BR (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Pod-Coverage-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788531
Summary: perl-Pod-Coverage-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785532
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-08
06:26:36 EST ---
perl-Gtk3-0.003-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785363
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-08
06:25:50 EST ---
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.006-2.fc16 has been submi
Sorry, I didn't mean to send this email. It turns out to be
caused by ibus.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
--
deve
After updating everything on my laptop to Rawhide (forced to by
usrmove) I noticed that emacs was no longer responding to
Control-Space for setting the mark.
It seems like the X server itself is eating this key combination,
since emacs works fine in a virtual console, but doesn't work in any
term
Summary of changes:
f0f7277... Update to 0.003 release (rhbz #785532) (*)
98d6e5d... Add Cairo::GObject BR (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de.
Hi, It appears Audacity is getting close to v2 release (it's been in 1.3
beta mode for a few years).
I've built the current svn release as 2.0.0.alpha... , and request
anyone with audio hardware who would like to help to download and
install it to check whichever functions you feel like testin
Summary of changes:
9d32333... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
58b3199... Update to 0.006 release (rhbz #785363) (*)
3e52570... Fix typo (*)
ca852de... Remove obsolete patch (-EMONDAY) (*)
8d11321... Add Cairo::GObject BR for tests (*)
(*) This commit alr
commit 98d6e5d2bb9e923ddc9b3dbf0d08bd6e12a7f0ad
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Wed Feb 8 10:29:36 2012 +
Add Cairo::GObject BR
perl-Gtk3.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk3.spec b/perl-Gtk3.spec
index b83d03e..dfe36ff 10064
commit 8d11321ef4035de702e4cca5a32a08c5b29f6753
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Wed Feb 8 10:27:01 2012 +
Add Cairo::GObject BR for tests
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Glib-Object-Introspectio
Summary of changes:
e15c52b... update to 1.4402 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
commit e15c52bc0a223bea0b753785c76910806751916d
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Feb 8 10:59:36 2012 +0100
update to 1.4402
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta:
136571ea3aa3b21046346f7d1606a0a6 Parse-CPAN-Meta-1.4402.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Summary of changes:
8fd48e0... update to 0.006010 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
commit 8fd48e001e9e3abbd7dbb2c1f5401d77dfd2c815
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Feb 8 10:55:25 2012 +0100
update to 0.006010
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Devel-Declare.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff -
Summary of changes:
c06fff3... update to 0.07017 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
commit c06fff31b6ec05d4b2ae677800f617de5f656ae7
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Feb 8 10:54:27 2012 +0100
update to 0.07017
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insert
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
