Am 09.02.2012 01:23, schrieb Adam Williamson: > Our experience, though, is that this is entirely the wrong way to do things. > The problem is that life is rarely so neat: you don't get an orderly > succession > of Big Scary Bugs popping up one at a time for you to shoot down.
there are enough open bugs for the next ten years > No, it's usually the case that there are ten or a dozen Big Scary Bugs at any > one > time. Given that, it's a very bad idea to find one and then focus all > attention on > it: block all releases until it's fixed and stop looking for or working on > other BSBs. it is a very good idea because the overall quality of fedora would be improved if there would be a larger release-blocking to get the big changes fixed BEFORE alpha and in the meantime not involved maintainers could proceed fixing the tons of small bugs and polish the distribution at all - there are really neough rough corners involved in the last releases to work on that there is no need to proceed this way of releasing and starting alpha/beta with known broken things
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
