License was actually changed at upstream 1.90 release.
robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I have taken:
* ack
* perl-Data-Types
* perl-MongoDB
* Zim
robin
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key
>> reset,
>> packages that had owners who were inacti
Hi,
I am observing weird build failures for f15:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3638192
The corresponding root.log
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3638193&name=root.log)
tells this:
,,,
DEBUG backend.py:862: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot',
'/var/lib/
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
>
> The list of orphaned packag
On Wed 11 Jan 2012 03:27:53 CET, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 22:52 +0100, nodata wrote:
>> I use Fedora for my desktops. I encounter three "death by a thousand
>> papercuts" daily. Judging by the bugzilla traffic I'm nearly the only
>> one with these problems.
>>
>> 1. I cannot sa
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> >packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> >comaintainer who were ina
On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
> packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
> maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had
> quit and had left 100s of
On 01/10/2012 09:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructu
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 22:52 +0100, nodata wrote:
> I use Fedora for my desktops. I encounter three "death by a thousand
> papercuts" daily. Judging by the bugzilla traffic I'm nearly the only
> one with these problems.
>
> 1. I cannot save my keyboard layout in Gnome. I have to reset it every
> ti
The lightweight tag 'perl-Crypt-RSA-1.99-8.fc17' was created pointing to:
1667712... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit 16677125c8322ab716a547b3f8c0f93a03e6c923
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jan 10 22:26:03 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- Nobody else likes macros for commands
- Use a patch rather than scripted iconv to fix character encodings
- Use %{_fixperms} macro rather than our own c
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:50:53 +0100,
Richard wrote:
>
> the privacy issue is a topic for Fedora because Fedora desktop users
> have a substantial disadvantage compared to users of more frequently
> used desktops. Intercepting a Fedora version string will in most
> regions of the world ide
nodata (l...@nodata.co.uk) said:
> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
> http://panopticlick.eff.org/
>
> Privacy conscious users are able to install a user agent switching
> extension.
... which (at least according to the referenced paper there) makes you
actually *more* trackable
On Tue 10 Jan 2012 22:50:53 CET, Richard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
>> Why is that a topic for fedora? I don't think, we should patch
>> programs and remove the versions printing everywhere. You are free to
>> discuss this with upstream and that's it (o
I use Fedora for my desktops. I encounter three "death by a thousand
papercuts" daily. Judging by the bugzilla traffic I'm nearly the only
one with these problems.
1. I cannot save my keyboard layout in Gnome. I have to reset it every
time I login by adding and removing a keyboard layout.
https:/
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Why is that a topic for fedora? I don't think, we should patch
> programs and remove the versions printing everywhere. You are free to
> discuss this with upstream and that's it (or do a foo-privacy fork of
> course ;)).
the privacy
On 2012-01-10 12:22, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Considering koji build root regeneration, all (Perl and Python) packages
> whose build task started between post-event-4227982 rotation and
> post-4250009-event rotation are affected.
Not all of them are -- in fact I believe few are. Regarding Perl, the
i
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.045-2.fc17' was created pointing
to:
251813a... Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko
wrote:
> Also, we have moved upstream-tracker service from
> http://linuxtesting.org/upstream-tracker/ to the new URL:
> http://upstream-tracker.org/
I saw the api-sanity-checker link from there and decided to package it:
https://bugzilla.redha
El Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:01:48 +0100
Pavel Lisy escribió:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying make rpm of qmail and I've ended in situation where mock
> can't create group/users during "mock rebuild".
>
> Qmail compilation requires make it under specific user.
>
> How can I solve it? Can I force user creation
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Loader-2.03-14.fc17' was created pointing to:
26a6357... Nobody else likes macros for commands
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Laurent Rineau
wrote:
> Le mardi 10 janvier 2012 08:18:18 Rex Dieter a écrit :
>> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
>> > but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
>> > set prop
Le mardi 10 janvier 2012 08:18:18 Rex Dieter a écrit :
> Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
> > but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
> > set properly.
>
> I'm not sure this is redundant, as I would imaging
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.01.2012 00:13, schrieb Richard:
>> many of the different user agent and service banners are way
>> too detailed for my taste
>
> thank you for supporting my opinion that a software should
> per default disclose as less informations as
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
>> but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
>> set properly.
>
> I'm not sure this is redundant, as I would imaging it wo
commit 26a6357be02c101a0dd463d5d704d62143953740
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jan 10 14:18:30 2012 +
Nobody else likes macros for commands
perl-Class-Loader.spec | 53 +--
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
> but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
> set properly.
I'm not sure this is redundant, as I would imaging it would be hard to infer
the origin of the target_link_library (
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Pavel Lisy wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying make rpm of qmail and I've ended in situation where mock
> can't create group/users during "mock rebuild".
>
> Qmail compilation requires make it under specific user.
>
> How can I solve it? Can I force user creation in mock
Hello
I'm trying make rpm of qmail and I've ended in situation where mock
can't create group/users during "mock rebuild".
Qmail compilation requires make it under specific user.
How can I solve it? Can I force user creation in mock somehow?
Pavel
--
Pavel Lisy
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
In data martedì 10 gennaio 2012 12:38:22, Nicola Soranzo ha scritto:
> Il giorno mar, 10/01/2012 alle 12.20 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana ha
>
> scritto:
> > Hi to all!
> > I am learning how to help in review process of new package. I
> > navigate on new package review tickets and I see this Review
>
Il giorno mar, 10/01/2012 alle 12.20 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana ha
scritto:
> Hi to all!
> I am learning how to help in review process of new package. I navigate on
> new package review tickets and I see this Review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639323
>
> The telepathy-
Hi to all!
I am learning how to help in review process of new package. I navigate on
new package review tickets and I see this Review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639323
The telepathy-qt4 is already included in fedora repository. Can I close
this bug? How can I do it?
Th
On 2012-01-09, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 2012-01-08 21:42, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> I've been doing some rebuilds of my packages for the gcc 4.7 mass
>> rebuild and when comparing the F16 and newly-rebuilt packages, I seem
>> to be losing a lot of the perl dependencies.
>
> file 5.10 has changed magi
37 matches
Mail list logo
