On 01/10/2012 06:40 AM, Marc Bradshaw wrote:
Hi All,
I am unable to devote the necessary time at the moment, so I am
orphaning the following packages. Please feel free to grab them if they
are of interest to you.
GREYCstoration -- An image denoising and interpolation tool
Upstream have ce
Hi,
On 01/06/2012 10:34 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 06/01/2012 19:00, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
How do you generally make use of it? In the course of my build process
I don't normally have two versions of the same library installed on one
machine which seems to be what is needed to use it.
I u
On 09/01/12 22:19, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>> - from a spec and srpm
>>> - start a koji scratch build
>>> - if build worked
>>> - upload to fedorapeople.org
>>> - create the bugzilla ticket
>>> - Add the koji build in the bugzilla as a link
>>> - otherwise:
>>> - warn user
Dne 10.1.2012 06:40, Marc Bradshaw napsal(a):
sl -- Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls'
The most important package in whole Fedora repos. I will gladly take it
(also, the number of bugs there seems to be acceptable).
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +1100, Marc Bradshaw wrote:
> moreutils -- Additional unix utilities
> docbook2X -- Convert docbook into man and Texinfo
> perl-Time-Duration -- Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of
> durations
I use moreutils on all my machines so I would lik
Hi All,
I am unable to devote the necessary time at the moment, so I am orphaning
the following packages. Please feel free to grab them if they are of
interest to you.
GREYCstoration -- An image denoising and interpolation tool
Upstream have ceased development, concepts are now a gimp plugin.
Another one for the history books (in case anyone wondered, we link to
the cancellation mails on the 'meeting' wiki page, so I need a
cancellation mail for each cancelled meeting...): the QA meeting for
2012-01-02 was cancelled, as with the three previous weeks, due to a
lack of topics requiring di
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 10:25 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:22:50 -0800,
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> > > it was GPLv3 ins
W dniu 10.01.2012 02:24, Petr Machata pisze:
> Julian Sikorski writes:
>
>> I was trying to build mame (an rpmfusion package) with gcc-4.7. I have
>> managed to get it to build, but it fails at the linking stage:
>>
>> obj/sdl/libocore.a(sdlsocket.o): In function `operator new(unsigned long)':
>>
Julian Sikorski writes:
> I was trying to build mame (an rpmfusion package) with gcc-4.7. I have
> managed to get it to build, but it fails at the linking stage:
>
> obj/sdl/libocore.a(sdlsocket.o): In function `operator new(unsigned long)':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/mame-0.144u5/src/emu/emualloc.h
Am 10.01.2012 00:13, schrieb Richard:
> many of the different user agent and service banners are way
> too detailed for my taste
thank you for supporting my opinion that a software should
per default disclose as less informations as possible
SAMBA is currently my hate candidate in a LAN
Nessus/
Hi,
many of the different user agent and service banners are way too detailed
for my taste.
It sucks privacy wise - disclosing Fedora version, CPU, kernel version,
browser version and a few other details mindlessly included in many user
agent/service banners would in many cases allow near foolp
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:04 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 11:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
> > wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
> > is simple:
> > - from
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 21:56 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> I don't think this should belong to fedpkg. Maybe more to the great
> fedora-review-tool (to make a tool/package bundling all review-related
> tools).
That would be also my feeling.
> I would like to see this packaged it sooner than l
On 01/09/2012 11:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
> wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
> is simple:
> - from a spec and srpm
> - start a koji scratch build
> - if build worke
openCOLLADA has had issues with parallel makes from the beginning and
at the time I didn't know cmake well enough to do anything about it.
Apparently I still haven't gotten it figured out.
I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
but I think that's redundant because ta
On 09/01/12 18:11, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 9.1.2012 17:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Hi,
Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
is simple:
It would be really nice if something like t
On 12/26/2011 05:56 PM, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build libzrtpcpp-2.0.0 (see http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ccrtp/ ).
> But it is impossible to build it in Fedora because
> openssl/ec.h is disabled in openssl which is build with no-ec option.
>
> libzrtpcpp/crypto/openssl/ZrtpD
On 01/09/2012 12:03 PM, Ed Marshall wrote:
No, I most certainly did not write the quoted statement.
Sorry, you are right, you responded to that statement made by others. I
apologize.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I appear to have miscounted, it was my first chairing experience. My apologies.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> * #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher, 18:07:22)
>> * AGREED: #topic #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher,
>> 18:16:38)
>>
>>
> * #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher, 18:07:22)
> * AGREED: #topic #720 kay - provenpackager for /usr move (limburgher,
> 18:16:38)
>
> (NOTE, vote was +6, -1, 0:0)
Who voted -1? The logs show:
pjones, nirik, limburgher, sgallagh, mjg59, notting: +1
mmaslano abstaining
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-01-09)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:30 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-01-09/fesco.2012-01-09-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> no, maybe you should read AND try to understand
>>>
>>
>> This kind of behaviour isn't
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:03:43AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >>no, maybe you should read AND try to understand
> >
> >This kind of behaviour isn't acceptable within the pro
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:04:33AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I think I'm almost there. I was also troubleshooting parallel make
> issues but I think I've got that sorted out (thankfully it builds with
> cmake).
>
> The build seems to pause for a while and I see the following output:
>
> /build
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> file 5.10 has changed magics for various scripts in a way that causes
> missing autodeps at least for Perl and Python scripts.
This is a fairly frequently recurring problem; wouldn't it make sense
to start building a small collection of files
On 2012-01-08 21:42, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I've been doing some rebuilds of my packages for the gcc 4.7 mass
> rebuild and when comparing the F16 and newly-rebuilt packages, I seem
> to be losing a lot of the perl dependencies.
file 5.10 has changed magics for various scripts in a way that causes
I hope someone is interested in taking fpc and lazarus.
I can upgrade them to latest versions (I did on my PC to solve some
problem on another package), but I'm not sure if I can maintain them in
future if some problem arise...
Il 09/01/2012 15:25, Jean-Francois Saucier ha scritto:
I would li
Dne 9.1.2012 17:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Hi,
Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
is simple:
- from a spec and srpm
- start a koji scratch build
- if build worked
- upl
I think I'm almost there. I was also troubleshooting parallel make
issues but I think I've got that sorted out (thankfully it builds with
cmake).
The build seems to pause for a while and I see the following output:
/builddir/build/BUILD/openCOLLADA-svn864/COLLADASaxFrameworkLoader/src/generated14
No, I most certainly did not write the quoted statement.
(My contribution has solely been suggesting that they get upstream on board;
or, failing that, find a convincing argument for the Fedora package maintainer
to diverge from upstream.)
--
Ed Marshall
http://esm.logic.net/
On Jan 9, 2012,
Hi,
Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
is simple:
- from a spec and srpm
- start a koji scratch build
- if build worked
- upload to fedorapeople.org
- create the bugzilla ticke
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:22:50 -0800,
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> > it was GPLv3 instead of GPLv2 as noted in the spec file. I am not sure
> > exactly w
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> it was GPLv3 instead of GPLv2 as noted in the spec file. I am not sure
> exactly when the change occured.
>
Note, the LICENSE file itself is not enough to s
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:24:48 -0500,
Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> If there's a concern over the debug options in the rawhide kernel
> being enabled (which would be ironic, considering we're talking about
> getting advanced testing and debug), the kernel team is going to build
> one kernel per relea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
no, maybe you should read AND try to understand
This kind of behaviour isn't acceptable within the project. Treat your
fellow community members with respect. You're expected to follow
commit 706c95235ce3f12ed1b6dc7f3da1508cfc7cea05
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Mon Jan 9 15:35:16 2012 +
Update to 0.9.9
perl-Sys-Virt.spec | 11 ---
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt.spec b/perl-S
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
17414b3331b069d0d443034a24130d1f Sys-Virt-0.9.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I want to retire shmpps in Fedora 16+, leaving it in F15 and EPEL. I
> haven't retired a package, so I wanted to double check the process. I
> should just retire the F16 and devel branches and that will leave the
> rest active, right?
>
> I'm
I want to retire shmpps in Fedora 16+, leaving it in F15 and EPEL. I
haven't retired a package, so I wanted to double check the process. I
should just retire the F16 and devel branches and that will leave the
rest active, right?
I'm retiring it because it is no longer needed. shmpps is a hack t
On 01/09/2012 09:38 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 07:24 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> a concern over the debug opt
>
> Alternatively - just build it without debugging - download the source
> rpm(s).
>
...
Of course (should go without saying ... but) the obvious downside to
the speed b
On 01/09/2012 07:24 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> a concern over the debug opt
Alternatively - just build it without debugging - download the source
rpm(s).
After installing/setting up the rpm tools, unpack (rpm -iv) the source
rpm in ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS dir - then go to ~/rpmbuild/SPEC and do:
rpmbuil
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:33:39PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 01:02 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >On 01/09/2012 12:55 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >>On 01/09/2012 12:20 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >>I've figured out that the problem was introduced by the update of "file"
> >>from 5.09 to 5.10
I would like to take the following packages :
mediatomb
mt-daapd
ethtool
wormux
gnochm
Thanks!
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> I had previously taken over the mediawiki-openid package from Axel
>> Thimm in like earl
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:43 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> If one looks at the source, it is immediately clear where the problem
> is: the Annotation::add() template is const and tries to call non-const
> members. But that is nothing new in gcc 4.7--I wonder how it ever
> buit before... Anyway, the att
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> no, maybe you should read AND try to understand
This kind of behaviour isn't acceptable within the project. Treat your
fellow community members with respect. You're expected to follow the
Fedora Code of Conduct
(http://fedoraproj
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> I had previously taken over the mediawiki-openid package from Axel
> Thimm in like early 2010. I'd also be willing to take over fail2ban
> (also Axil Thimm). So that's 2 down, 800 to go =).
>
I'm willing to take:
bsd-games
deutex
freedoom
free
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.01.2012 07:27, schrieb Ed Marshall:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> if a software-package, information, disclosure is NOT NEEDED it has
>>> to be disabled - again: take some security education!
>>
>> And,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It might make some sense to have a separate repo for the lastest kernels
> on released versions of Fedora. Maybe one than one, since some people may
> be willing to test RCs and other people just want to get a jump on trying
> the latest re
Am 09.01.2012 07:27, schrieb Ed Marshall:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> if a software-package, information, disclosure is NOT NEEDED it has
>> to be disabled - again: take some security education!
>
> And, there we go.
>
> Convince upstream to change their behavior
51 matches
Mail list logo
