Re: unwanted devel-dependencies (currently perl)

2012-01-05 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:42:24AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 2012-01-05 03:25, Reindl Harald wrote: > > why in the world introducing updates the installation > > of devel-packages? > > Packaging bugs, in this case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/748362 . And https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 11:55 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains. Neither does an "ordered rebuild". Even assuming the concept of

New cfitsio (3.290) in rawhide

2012-01-05 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hi, a new cfistio package (3.290) as landed in rawhide. Packages depending on cfitsio should be rebuilt. Regards, Sergio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 01/05/2012 03:10 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: I've seen nils' list and a few of my packages are on it. What can we do now to fix it? I've noticed some koji builds for the new compiler but other than that, should I wait for the FTB.. to come in? One of my packages was on the list, it had a simpl

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than > those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains. Neither does an "ordered rebuild". Even assuming the concept of ordering was any more well defined than ts

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Lane wrote: > I've got other critpath packages, so I know exactly what kind of > additional bureaucracy I'm getting into, thank you. But I'm not > following how something that's not even installed by default can > reasonably become marked critpath. mysql-server is actually installed by defaul

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/04/2012 06:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build packages them

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/05/2012 09:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Brendan Jones wrote: Can understand that this is a hot topic but ... Surely for a single user desktop you don't need a concurrent DB backend. Try reading your existing mail while fetching new one. (Just one example.) (And that hasn't worked with KMa

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Robinson writes: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> That answer doesn't make me any happier.  I've got a problem with being >>> saddled with an extra layer of bureaucracy without any say-so on my >>> part, and I'm also q

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 10:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I guess you are referring an "ordered rebuild", not a "simple sequential rebuild". The latter would be mostly useless. For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I guess you are referring an "ordered rebuild", not a "simple sequential > rebuild". > > The latter would be mostly useless. For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any mass rebuild assists more than having

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Callaway
Fixed my broken packages in rawhide: * libjingle - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623092 * rekall - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623152 * xbase - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623229 * xsupplicant - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koj

[389-devel] Adding links to the changeset from ticket update

2012-01-05 Thread Rich Megginson
When you commit and push a patch to the git repo, and you add the git commit message to the ticket comment, you can easily make the commit a link to the changeset in the trac source browser - just change commit 20ab029c0f0309838 to commit changeset:20ab029c0f0309838/389-ds-base the tra

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 09:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 Tom Callaway escribió: On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the mass rebuild or if all pac

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Stijn Hoop wrote: > Well it also took them two years to consider 'NFS mounted home' a valid > use case, during which the whole 'you really need MySQL!!!' was broken > for our site. It's easy to switch (maybe I should blog about it... ) per user: kcmshell4 akonadi per machine/site: create/edit

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 > > Tom Callaway escribió: > > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for t

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:20:55 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). > > NO, not again!!! > > Can we please stop this nonsense? > > Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT > using the SQLite backend by default. SQLit

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Dennis Gilmore wrote: > considering that mysql couldnt cope with my email and i had to stop > using kmail all together going to sqlite im sure would be worse. but > thats my 2c Flipping defaults doesn't mean other backends cannot be used. We've helped make sure that switching backends (to/from

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 > Tom Callaway escribió: > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the > > > mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of depende

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
On Thursday 05 January 2012, Michael J Gruber wrote: > I don't know anything about rpmfusion packaging and infrastructure, so > I'd be happy if someone picks up xine-ui there. In fact, xine-ui gets > most xine related abrt reports, it seems, and I always found it > difficult to decide whether those

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). > > NO, not again!!! > > Can we please stop this nonsense? > > Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT using > the SQLite backend by default. SQLite doesn't support concurrency (i.e. >

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Brendan Jones wrote: > Can understand that this is a hot topic but ... Surely for a single user > desktop you don't need a concurrent DB backend. Try reading your existing mail while fetching new one. (Just one example.) (And that hasn't worked with KMail 1 ever, AFAIK KMail 2 finally fixes this,

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

2012-01-05 Thread Michael J Gruber
Kevin Kofler venit, vidit, dixit 05.01.2012 20:56: > Hi, > > the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) > > The Xine project: > http://www.xine-project.org/home > has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. > > Unfortunately, among the list of changes: > http://sourceforge.net/p

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 05.01.2012 20:22, schrieb Kevin Kofler: >> Akonadi ships its own default MySQL configuration, which is per user. It >> does not use or require the systemwide instance (by default; it can be >> configured to connect to a systemwide or even remote MySQL server, but >>

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: > does it also run "mysql_upgrade" automatically or is it > supposed to be the road of dead two mysql-major-releases > later? AFAIK, it does run mysql_upgrade when needed. > somehow strange that amarok was crippled down from optional > mysqld-usage to sqlite and now KDE intro

qt accessibility, anyone interested?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Being the avid package monkey I am, I whipped up some initial packaging for http://gitorious.org/qt-at-spi/ in my space at http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt-at-spi/ Hoping someone with more interest in this area would be able to pick this up to maintain officially. Be happy to help with s

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:20:55 +0100 Kevin Kofler escribió: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). > > NO, not again!!! > > Can we please stop this nonsense? > > Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT > using the SQLite backend by default. SQL

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/view there are these n

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:08:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:13:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> We could consider having pkgdb e-mail the owner when the critpath bit for > >> the package gets flipped. Toshio, is that possible? > > > It

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/05/2012 08:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). NO, not again!!! Can we please stop this nonsense? Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT using the SQLite backend by default. SQLite doesn't support concurrency

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > kdepim is in critical path as part of 'critical-path-apps', which is > > essentially mail & web. The change that caused this to get added is that > > the script prior to early December wasn't actually iterating over the > > p

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.01.2012 20:22, schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Akonadi ships its own default MySQL configuration, which is per user. It > does not use or require the systemwide instance (by default; it can be > configured to connect to a systemwide or even remote MySQL server, but the > default is a local per-u

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > kdepim is in critical path as part of 'critical-path-apps', which is > essentially mail & web. The change that caused this to get added is that > the script prior to early December wasn't actually iterating over the > proper critpath groups, including critical-path-apps. I

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Lane wrote: > I'd recommend it. mysql is kind of a heavyweight requirement to have > underneath a desktop component: it raises the ante in terms of what has > to be installed and running, and in terms of required sysadmin-ish > know-how. (Does the average user have a clue how to configure mys

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rex Dieter wrote: > I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). NO, not again!!! Can we please stop this nonsense? Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT using the SQLite backend by default. SQLite doesn't support concurrency (i.e. any Akonadi operation blocks all othe

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi writes: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:13:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> We could consider having pkgdb e-mail the owner when the critpath bit for > >> the package gets flipped. Toshio, is that possible? > > > It is if

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Toshio Kuratomi writes: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:13:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> We could consider having pkgdb e-mail the owner when the critpath bit for >> the package gets flipped. Toshio, is that possible? > It is if we decide we want to do that. > Just let me know and I'll gener

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:13:47PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > > So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was > > astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that > > before. Who decided this, > > The dependency solv

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Rex Dieter writes: > Bill Nottingham wrote: >> As to where it came from, the dep chain is: >> >> kdepim >> -> akonadi >> -> qt-mysql, mysql-server >> >> kdepim is in critical path as part of 'critical-path-apps', which is >> essentially mail & web. > Sorry Tom, didn't foresee all the implicatio

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-01-05 20:34, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >>> ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 >> >> I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you >> rephrase? > > Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 d

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Brendan Jones wrote: On 01/05/2012 07:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Sorry Tom, didn't foresee all the implications when we flipped f16's default akonadi backend sqlite -> mysql late(ish) in the cycle. I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). -- rex Just my 2c, I'm also of the opinion something li

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bill Nottingham writes: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-December/000868.html > ... The change that caused this to get added is that the > script prior to early December wasn't actually iterating over the proper > critpath groups, including critical-path-apps. Ah. S

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/05/2012 07:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Sorry Tom, didn't foresee all the implications when we flipped f16's default akonadi backend sqlite -> mysql late(ish) in the cycle. I'm of a mind to revisit this (again). -- rex Just my 2c, I'm also of the opinion something lighter than mysql is mor

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 > > I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you > rephrase? Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 disttags, to help avoid the "why do I have a fc15 p

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: >> So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was >> astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that >> before. Who decided this, > > The dependency solver. It's not a manual process. > >> and woul

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you rephrase? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was > astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that > before. Who decided this, The dependency solver. It's not a manual process. > and would it not have been polite to involv

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Robinson writes: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> That answer doesn't make me any happier. I've got a problem with being >> saddled with an extra layer of bureaucracy without any say-so on my >> part, and I'm also quite nervous about the idea of something that is >> gen

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
the idea of something > that is genuinely critpath depending on something as rickety as mysql. > > How would I find out exactly where the dep came from, so I can have > a word with that package's maintainer? > > regards, tom lane http://koji.fedoraproje

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dennis Gilmore writes: >> El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:16:34 -0500 >> Tom Lane escribió: >>> So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was >>> astonished to find that it's marked as critpath.  It was never that >>> before.  Who dec

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Dennis Gilmore writes: > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:16:34 -0500 > Tom Lane escribió: >> So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was >> astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that >> before. Who decided this, and would it not have been polite to >> invo

Re: mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:16:34 -0500 Tom Lane escribió: > So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was > astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that > before. Who decided this, and would it not have been polite to > involve or at least notify the packag

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:20:09 +0100 Michael Schwendt escribió: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:11:07 -0600, DG (Dennis) wrote: > > > > > Is it significant that all three filenames end in "-srpm"? Or > > > > should this be considered a bug in Koji? > > > > > > I think the -srpm in there is not important.

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 Tom Callaway escribió: > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the > > mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc > > were going to be rebuilt. > > My understanding is t

mysql is now a critpath package? WTF?

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that before. Who decided this, and would it not have been polite to involve or at least notify the package maintainer? regards, tom lane -- de

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Björn Persson
> I'll try to get a macros.gnat-srpm into redhat-rpm- config. I have filed this request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772012 Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Björn Persson
Petr Pisar wrote: > I've already written suggestion to redhat-rpm-config owner to plug > dependencies maintained by particular SIGs (like perl or ada) to get > them controll over macros in minimal build root. However he has never > replied. > > I think this is inevitabla to allow smooth upgrades a

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the mass > rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc were going > to be rebuilt. My understanding is that we traditionally rebuild everything at the time of a mass rebuild,

Re: Review swaps

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270 lv2-ams-plugins - LV2 port of the Alsa Modular Synth modules https://b

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Björn Persson
Thanks Michael and Dennis! I'll try to get a macros.gnat-srpm into redhat-rpm- config. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-01-04, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I assume this is only required for packages that use gcc? So any other >> packages (perl, python, java, etc.) are excluded from this, correct? >> > A lot of modules in interpreted languages use compiled glue

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:11:07 -0600, DG (Dennis) wrote: > > > Is it significant that all three filenames end in "-srpm"? Or > > > should this be considered a bug in Koji? > > > > I think the -srpm in there is not important. > > > > $ ls /etc/rpm > > macros.color macros.fjava macros.mono-srp

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:22:34 +0100 Michael Schwendt escribió: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:08:21 +0100, BP (Björn) wrote: > > > I need some advice on how to fix this build failure. The GtkAda > > package builds fine in Mock, but fails in Koji with the error "No > > matching arches were found": > > > >

Re: Need some advice on best packaging practices for a tricky package?

2012-01-05 Thread David Howells
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Just ignore rpmlint there. :-) If you have proper Requires in place to > ensure the symlink targets will actually be installed, it's fine. I do, so I'll just ignore them. > Yes, it's called noarch subpackages and has been supported in Fedora for a > while. Just declare t

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Petr Pisar
I've already written suggestion to redhat-rpm-config owner to plug dependencies maintained by particular SIGs (like perl or ada) to get them controll over macros in minimal build root. However he has never replied. I think this is inevitabla to allow smooth upgrades and boot-strapping of big packa

Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:08:21 +0100, BP (Björn) wrote: > I need some advice on how to fix this build failure. The GtkAda package > builds > fine in Mock, but fails in Koji with the error "No matching arches were > found": > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3621310 > > Severa

using a macro in ExclusiveArch

2012-01-05 Thread Björn Persson
I need some advice on how to fix this build failure. The GtkAda package builds fine in Mock, but fails in Koji with the error "No matching arches were found": http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3621310 Several Ada packages need an ExclusiveArch directive to prevent attempts to b

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-01-04, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide >> for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. >> >> as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) >> packagers will have jus

[perl-Cache-FastMmap] update to 1.40

2012-01-05 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 7cda3d0eb50785cf0b341565e530f1b23a91908e Author: Iain Arnell Date: Thu Jan 5 11:11:12 2012 +0100 update to 1.40 .gitignore |1 + perl-Cache-FastMmap.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --

File Cache-FastMmap-1.40.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-01-05 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Cache-FastMmap: e0929ba556c629a43f5d65a2b6cb9a2f Cache-FastMmap-1.40.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-05 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:17:16AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > ~ without recurse, and standard XDG directories in ~ with recurse. > In ~/Documents I have 4GiB of mostly .c source files in various revisions, > for a total of 189833 files. In other directories I have 5 photos in .jpg, > and couple

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-05 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:22:12PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Also, 30 GiB in .cache/tracker is a bit extreme when rest of my ~ is 4 > > GiB. > > Tracker should only index a few standard directories ($HOME without > subdirector