On 08/22/2011 06:04 AM, Steve Grubb wrote
> Sorry, I was very busy at the time. I am just beginning to look to the future
> and what
> might be coming my way for RHEL7 common criteria.
It is ok to be busy but when you are busy, decisions will be made
without your input. You can't complain abou
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:14:05 -0300
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Nathan Owe
> wrote:
> > I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following
> > error using rpmlint:
> > rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
> > c-
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Nathan Owe wrote:
> I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error using
> rpmlint:
> rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
> c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
> c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file
I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error using
rpmlint:
rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/c-icap-libicapapi-config
c-ic
This could use some testing love. If it misses Fedora 16 final, it
won't be a huge setback. The only change between what's already in f16
and this updated package is the two bug fixes mentioned. I've tested
those fixes myself (my workstation didn't work properly until the fixes
went in, not that
Dear Fedora package maintainers
To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora
Localization will have our review packages process using the image
composed specifically for this purpose. This image will be composed
between 25-26 August. Then many different languages' translators ca
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 08:01:33 PM Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 05:24 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Imagine an updated xinetd + upstart. Would that not solve the
> > problems, cause less turmoil, and be more secure?
>
> How? Fedora has talked about moving to systemd much before the Fed
On 08/22/2011 05:24 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Imagine an updated xinetd + upstart. Would that not solve the
> problems, cause less turmoil, and be more secure? -Steve
How? Fedora has talked about moving to systemd much before the Fedora
14 release. It was postponed to Fedora 15, has become the
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 05:22:17 PM Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/21/2011 05:09 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> >>> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
> >>>
> >>> Read the part about "Parallelizing Socket Services". It explains why
> >>> socket actviation is interesting,
> >>
> >> I find
Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert:
> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
>>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of
>>> community. I guess if
On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of
>> community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgd
On 08/21/2011 05:09 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
>>>
>>> Read the part about "Parallelizing Socket Services". It explains why
>>> socket actviation is interesting,
>> I find a secure OS interesting. Bootup speed does not matter much to me.
>>
>> -Steve
>
On 08/20/2011 03:31 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 02:17:04 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 20.08.11 09:41, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:50:01 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tim Waugh wrote:
Oh, I just noticed this:
https://fedoraproj
>
>
> Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb MichaÅ Piotrowski:
>> 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald :
>>>
>>> Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
> about
Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
> 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald :
>>
>> Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>> On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>>>
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-rel
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 17:50:21 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of
> updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]).
>
> Anybody knows if the problem will be solved?
I think the builds needed are al
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:48 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will
> be possible in F16?
Hi Joachim,
It won't be possible in the near future, because it's orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit
Unles
On 08/21/2011 09:34 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be
> possible in F16?
It has been orphaned
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit
So unless someone takes over, no
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
Hi,
in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be
possible in F16?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Hi,
since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of
updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]).
Anybody knows if the problem will be solved?
All help is welcome.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Descri
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 16:02:08 -0600,
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:55 -0700
> John Reiser wrote:
>
> > > How much memory will anaconda require to install Fedora 16?
> >
> > Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (>=1GB) if there is no swap partition.
>
> It is not just Anac
Compose started at Sun Aug 21 13:15:46 UTC 2011
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> There are Fedora "core", EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for
> newcomers to see several repository, and what are their
> relationships...
Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french
documentation on http://ww
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 01:24:16PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
>
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage.
> I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
> What is the u
Hello Olivier,
2011/8/21
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage. I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
> What is the usual behavior in this case ?
As I understand from the following:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ja
Compose started at Sun Aug 21 08:15:17 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
Hi,
I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
Jpackage.
I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer if
package c
Hello,
I've to updated opencv to 2.3.1 in f16 and rawhide today.
This will involve an ABI change so a rebuild of the dependent packages
are needed:
player
kipi-plugins
libkface
gstreamer-plugin-bad-extras
mrpt
fawkes
player
I've submitted a build override that should be available in 20minutes
fr
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
> > front[1]. There are still quite a few packages in the review queue. Some
> > hav
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 16:02 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:55 -0700
> John Reiser wrote:
>
> > > How much memory will anaconda require to install Fedora 16?
> >
> > Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (>=1GB) if there is no swap partition.
>
> It is not just Anaconda. F1
Johannes Lips googlemail.com> writes:
> what about using the Text Mode for the install? [1]
> According to the release notes it only needs 256MB of RAM so I think it
> should be feasible, or? [2]
> Are there anything preventing the usage of the textmode?
Unfortunately, those numbers are way out
31 matches
Mail list logo
