On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> - unoconv: Tool to convert between any document format supported by
> LibreOffice. has 1 open ABRT bug.
This is somewhat less useful now that libreoffice has command line
options for batch conversion, but since it is already here...
Hi everyone,
Due to time constraints I decided to drop my maintainership for the
following packages. I think it would be better to use my limited time
for a smaller set of packages.
- aldrin: Modular music sequencer/tracker. dead project. there is a
fork called neil which is active (not in Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701119
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701119
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-26
17:50:16 EDT ---
perl-Ouch-0.0401-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 s
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> It works fine with a local fine on my computer. Totem is launched
I just tried xdg-open on a local ogv file, as well as:
xdg-open http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/20110420-a-free-digital-society.ogv
on my computer (F14, KDE). In both cases, it runs Kaffeine just fine.
(I
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> You could say Bastien should have stopped the upnp package building at
> all rather than making it empty, but then if he didn't make something
> obsolete it, old versions would have stuck around and caused trouble,
> and if he makes somet
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:48 -0300, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I can understand the whole build not being killed over an optional
> plugin. However, should koji build an empty package? I would think
It rather depends on the spec file.
If you look at the spec, it has this:
%files upnp
%defattr(-, r
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 22:42 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> > like I said, it seems to be rather worse with a *local* video file - try
> > it. but sure, xdg-open is the right answer in theory, and where it's
> > broken we should fix it.
> It works fine with a local fine on my computer. Totem is l
Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Simply to make Fedora better. I'd like to make those available for our
> > > users.
> > > There are currently no other packages relying on this set (or rc, to be
> > > more
> > > specific) in Fedora. That could change in the future, though.
> >
> > Th
Hello,
In trying to report a bug about the totem-upnp package not working in
F15, I found that someone had already filed a bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694507
In it, the reason for it not working was totem-upnp was an *empty*
package. I checked on koji and while the bui
Le 26/05/2011 22:39, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 13:27 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
>> Le 24/05/2011 22:37, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Nicoleau Fabien
>>>wrote:
This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will
>
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 13:27 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> Le 24/05/2011 22:37, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Nicoleau Fabien
> > wrote:
> >> This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will
> >> read the video as a stream.
> >>
> >> The defau
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:52:34AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 07:39 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> > ons 2011-05-25 klockan 12:37 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
> >
> > > another issue that i thought of was existing ldap/nis systems that
> > > allocate
> > > regular users i
tor 2011-05-26 klockan 08:52 -0400 skrev Simo Sorce:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 07:39 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> > Personally I think UIDs and their relation to user accounts should be
> > treated as host-local. I also want a pony.
>
> It would be nice, but then there is NFS ...
Oh yes I'm
2011/5/26 Kevin Kofler :
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
>> device: dm-0
>> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
>> device: dm-1
>
> Try booting the installer with the "nodmraid" parameter.
>
>
On 05/26/2011 01:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> A rather late follow-up, but next time your VM crashes hard you could
> try this:
>
> https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/fun-new-virt-tools-virt-dmesg-and-virt-uname/
> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-dmesg/
>
> You will need the update
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
> device: dm-0
> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
> device: dm-1
Try booting the installer with the "nodmraid" parameter.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing lis
Hi,
I've tried to migrate on my job desktop from Mandriva to Fedora, but I
couldn't do it. (I've created a liveusb using liveusb-creator )
But installer fails to detect partitions on hard disk (only can see
usb drive) and it outputs something like:
"The storage device below may contain data"
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:14:39 +0200
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for
> several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even
> read the mails from bugzilla.
> I don't feel the need to take over the package but if
On 5/26/11 5:56 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> system users now have more space but they are not going to immediately
> overflow about the uid 500 area, for most installations they will still
> keeping being well below 500. And if your LDAP server has IDs below 500
> you are already in a world of pain. If
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8.3. This release fixes a few bugs found in 1.2.8.2.
Installation
yum install 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install 389-ds
setup-ds-admin.pl
Upgrade
yum upgrade 389-ds-base idm-console-framework 389-admin 389-ds-c
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:12 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:51:48PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > The problem is that yum-presto can be a bit of a memory hog (or, more
> > accurately, deltarpm is).
>
> While it's true that *create*deltarpm needs quite some memory,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
> > same ideas in this thread, would be having %{_libexecdir}/plan9 or similar,
> > with bin, lib and share (or whatever upstream supplies) subdirectories.
> You
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> > I'd like to thank all for their input.
> >
> > As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
> > same ideas in this thread, would be having %{_
On 2011-05-26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Petr Pisar writes:
>
>> Reviewer of my package found the package does pass tests in Koji
>> (dist-f16). I found the reason:
>>
>> A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT.
>
> That's a bug in the test. EACCES is a valid error if a PATH elemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2011 06:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>> A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT. This is how it
>> works even in my local Rawhide. However Koji glibc returns [EACCESS].
>
> I guess the difference is due to SE
Am 26.05.2011 14:51, schrieb Jonathan Dieter:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 14:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 26.05.2011 13:45, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
>>> On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:37:15 +0200, RH wrote:
>>>
some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
a virtual machine w
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:51:48PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> The problem is that yum-presto can be a bit of a memory hog (or, more
> accurately, deltarpm is).
While it's true that *create*deltarpm needs quite some memory,
*apply*deltarpm was designed to have a low memory footprint.
So I doub
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > today this update:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstar
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:30 -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can
> >> start looking at what is the best a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707826
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 19:04 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 03:14:43 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > > On 05/25/2011 06:14 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > > Coordination would be nice if we can decide on how w
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 07:39 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> ons 2011-05-25 klockan 12:37 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
>
> > another issue that i thought of was existing ldap/nis systems that allocate
> > regular users in the 500-1000 range when installing or upgrading if they
> > use
> > polic
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 14:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 26.05.2011 13:45, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:37:15 +0200, RH wrote:
> >
> >> some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
> >> a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM
> >>
> >> not enough memory?
> >
>
Am 26.05.2011 13:45, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:37:15 +0200, RH wrote:
>
>> some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
>> a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM
>>
>> not enough memory?
>
> Can you reproduce after removing the "yum-presto" plugin package?
sorr
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> I'd like to thank all for their input.
>
> As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
> same ideas in this thread, would be having %{_libexecdir}/plan9 or similar,
> with bin, lib and share (or whatever upst
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:17:17PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've been thinking about packaging 9base [1], a port of Plan 9 userspace
> tools,
> for Fedora. I'm interested in opinions on what style is "better" and why.
>
> The problem is most of 9base binaries (and their manpages)
On 05/26/2011 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider awareness.
>>
>> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
>> declared stable.
>>
>> .override files [1] i
On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:45:28 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:37:15 +0200, RH wrote:
>
> > some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
> > a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM
> >
> > not enough memory?
>
> Can you reproduce after removing the "yum-presto" pl
Le Mer 25 mai 2011 20:39, seth vidal a écrit :
> I think that's completely appropriate.
>
> But does that mean the pkg should stay out of the distro?
Note that there is *no* problem if the binaries are renamed in /usr/bin with
an explicit prefix, as has been asked from the beginning.
--
Nicol
On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:37:15 +0200, RH wrote:
> some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
> a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM
>
> not enough memory?
Can you reproduce after removing the "yum-presto" plugin package?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707920
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
some minutes ago i tried a dist-upgrade F14->F15 per yum on
a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM
not enough memory?
something goes terrible wrong here if yum needs hardware
with > 512 MB RAM without GUI, well since this is a test-machine
i can raise the memory, but there are many usecases for servers
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode-Locale:
96a950ee9b57e47e2b990b4c5dd7bf6e Encode-Locale-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Le 24/05/2011 22:37, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Nicoleau Fabien
> wrote:
>> This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will
>> read the video as a stream.
>>
>> The default value in the configuration file for the video player is "vlc
>> --qui
Petr Pisar wrote:
> A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT. This is how it
> works even in my local Rawhide. However Koji glibc returns [EACCESS].
I guess the difference is due to SELinux.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> Good. I guess I can produce both buildbot and buildbot-master from the
> current "buildbot" package, so just one review for buildbot-slave is
> actually needed?
Right.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 05/26/2011 04:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It's a feature for system administrators, not for Fedora packages. You'll
> have to ask system administrators whether and how they intend to make use of
> this.
My question, why push these features into an update, when you have no
idea whether it is
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider
>> awareness.
>>
>> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
>> declared stable.
>>
>> .override files [1] in upstart allows admi
On 05/26/2011 03:45 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> Ok, I admit that I should have sent announcement to allow wider awareness.
>
> upstart-1.0 branch is in fact minor update of upstart-0.6.5, it was just
> declared stable.
>
> .override files [1] in upstart allows admin to change behaviour of upstart
On 05/25/2011 09:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 04:34 PM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>> upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and
>> also adds new
>> features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files
>> feature adapted from Ubuntu.
>
> We do
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> buildbot-master
> buildbot-slave
> buildbot : meta-package which requires -master and -slave
Good. I guess I can produce both buildbot and buildbot-master from the
current "buildbot" package, so just one review for buildbot-slave is
a
Compose started at Thu May 26 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_gl.so.1.1()(64bit)
Ope
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:27 +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:07:32 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > > We can also annouce the 200 limit for reserved IDs. ;)
> >
> > We can't just make changes to this range.
On 05/25/2011 08:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> today this update:
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
>>> got pus
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:07:53 +0200, GS wrote:
> In 0.8.0 upstream split the slave functions into a separate
> buildbot-slave package
>
> In short, we need a new package (and review), but I've got no time for
> starting the procedure.
>
> Besides, it's an interesting upgrade path: what should we
On 05/20/2011 01:19 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> systemd does not redirect kmsg.
>>
>> We actually are no longer reading console= from the kernel cmdline. We
>> now rely entirely on /sys/class/tty/console/active which gives us
>> similar information.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:13:54AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:56:58PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Josh Stone (jist...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > Anyway, if kmsg msgs are lost for you this probably happens inside of
> > > > ply or something related, but not s
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, philippe makowski
wrote:
> is there any reason that we have buildbot 7.12 ((January 21, 2010))
> and that upstream is now 8.3 ?
> any problem to upgrade it ?
In 0.8.0 upstream split the slave functions into a separate
buildbot-slave package
In short, we need a ne
2011/5/26 Michael Schwendt :
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:19:21 +0200, PM wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there any reason that we have buildbot 7.12 ((January 21, 2010))
>> and that upstream is now 8.3 ?
>> any problem to upgrade it ?
>
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/buildbot
>
> lists three open tickets, w
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> reserved/system IDs are supposed to be once that has been done we can
>> start looking at what is the best approach to implement and or fix
>> things that might break because o
Petr Pisar writes:
> Reviewer of my package found the package does pass tests in Koji
> (dist-f16). I found the reason:
>
> A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT.
That's a bug in the test. EACCES is a valid error if a PATH element is
inaccessible.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab
Hi,
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:07:32 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Peter Vrabec wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:19:21 +0200, PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason that we have buildbot 7.12 ((January 21, 2010))
> and that upstream is now 8.3 ?
> any problem to upgrade it ?
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/buildbot
lists three open tickets, which have not been responded to yet either
64 matches
Mail list logo
