Hi,
On 04/29/2011 06:53 PM, John Brier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, I'm new to contributing but not new to Linux. I started on RHL 7.1
> around 2000 and have used Slackware, Gentoo and Debian in the past. I
> was active at my university LUG and Gaming Club (runn
On 4/29/2011 9:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It is somewhat difficult, and odd, to create a git repo that does not
> have a master branch. It would be a little more odd to potentially at
> some point in the future create the master branch for a package should
> it find a home within Fedora.
As you s
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:08:10PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 05:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Actually it looks like I was even lazier than that and just built it
> > from source. I seem to be running 2.32.52. I just needed whatever
> > version would interoperate with my Mand
On Fri, 29.04.11 17:46, Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote:
> > > I think /srv actually makes a lot of sense. Probably not so much on the
> > > desktop, but the boundaries are blurry, and I see no reason to set
> > > things up differently in this respect between servers and desktops. I
> > > see littl
On Fri, 29.04.11 16:34, Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote:
> > > I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
> > > is directly under /.
> >
> > Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16.
> >
> > Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to cre
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:30:02PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> Looking at the code, the 4-second delay is only used when the device is
> actually connected to something. State 3 == DISCONNECTED, state 2 ==
> UNAVAILABLE, so it's performing as expected here. Were there actually
> an IP address as
Compose started at Fri Apr 29 13:15:40 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
2011/4/30 Daniel J Walsh :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
>>> is
On Fri, 29.04.11 11:07, Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
> > is directly under /.
>
> I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd n
On Fri, 29.04.11 11:21, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd need to update
> > libselinux at least, definition of SELINUXMNT in
> > libselinux/src/policy.h, used by selinux_init_load_policy() to mount
> > selinuxfs for initial policy load.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
>> is directly under /.
>
> Yes, I think th
I just bought tickets for EuroPython (http://ep2011.europython.eu/)
and I'm wondering if anyone here is going to the event.
It would be nice to meet some Fedora friend there :)
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu
--
devel mailin
On Fri, 29.04.11 17:26, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2011/4/29 seth vidal :
> > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning
perl-Moose-Autobox has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Moose-Autobox-0.11-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(metaclass)
On i386:
perl-Moose-Autobox-0.11-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(metaclass)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http:
perl-MooseX-Traits has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Traits-0.11-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) >=
0:0.84
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Traits-0.11-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) >=
0:0.84
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedo
perl-Moose has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(Class::MOP::Module)
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(Class::MOP::Attribute)
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(metaclass)
perl-Moose-1.25
perl-MooseX-Types has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Types-0.22-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-0.22-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http:/
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.09-4.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) >= 0:0.84
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.09-4.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) >= 0:0.84
Please resolve this
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude has broken dependencies in the F-15
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.10-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.10-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
Please
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.02-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.02-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extr
perl-File-ChangeNotify has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.16-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.16-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-MooseX-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) >=
0:0.80
On i386:
perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) >=
0:0.80
Please resolve this as soon as possible
perl-Catalyst-Runtime has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
>= 0:0.95
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch req
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-10.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-10.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possibl
perl-CHI has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On x86_64:
perl-CHI-Test-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-CH
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) >= 0:0.80
On i386:
p
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast has broken dependencies in the F-15
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00903-5.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00903-5.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0011-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0011-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possi
On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
> is directly under /.
Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16.
Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to creat
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-NoTabs:
2f084761009e61084ff9c3bb8facb732 Test-NoTabs-1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Hi Jerry,
/*Jerry James */ wrote on 04/28/2011 10:19:39 PM
+0450:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
>
> openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
> This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
> slowly been pushing into Fed
On 04/30/2011 12:53 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is it essential that the templates remain the same across distros or
> is it more for simplicity of maintaining the package?
Simplicity.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 11:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> A tangentially related question about spec files...
>>
>> As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
>> noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree with the
>>
On 04/29/2011 11:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> A tangentially related question about spec files...
>
> As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
> noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree with the
> packaging guidelines
>
> Shouldn't they be updated to no longe
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:20 -0400, Phillip Lynn wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Phillip Lynn wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
> > > running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is s
=
#fedora-bugzappers: F15 blocker review #3
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-29/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-29-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugz
Tom Lane wrote:
> 1. An F-15 bug (and if so, which component ought I file it against)?
Something here. The expectation is the system to go to sleep (mine does).
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495832&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Having been not terribly impressed with GNOME 3 in F-15 alpha, I thought
I'd try installing the beta with KDE, just to see if the grass is any
greener. I'm still trying to find my way around that one too, but
I've run into one significant problem: when I close my laptop, the
machine doesn't go to
A tangentially related question about spec files...
As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree with the
packaging guidelines
Shouldn't they be updated to no longer include BuildRoot: or %clean as
they are obsolete? Or
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:01 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:58:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > > > > One thing I like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I'm new to contributing but not new to Linux. I started on RHL 7.1
around 2000 and have used Slackware, Gentoo and Debian in the past. I
was active at my university LUG and Gaming Club (running the game
servers on Slackware) and now I work for Red
On 4/29/11 8:54 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> > > How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
>>> > > rawhide branch without regard to whether one asks for it or not?
>> >
>> > I think the idea is that it allows people who wish to see reviews that
>> > are EPEL only.
Summary of changes:
f5a7142... Upstream update. Reflect upstream having switched to Build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
commit f5a71422d0eb3eb0a163d39b5746fec6824ae95a
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:55:33 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Reflect upstream having switched to Build.PL.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-HTML-Format.spec | 19 +++
sources |2 +-
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Format:
07b43da2e23ad4f6eeacee8219c65fa4 HTML-Format-2.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
> > On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
> > > got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
> > > file it there.
> >
> > How is this any different, given that proc
Outage: FAS and dependent web apps - 2011-05-02 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-02 21:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-05-02 21:00 UTC'
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 17:26 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/4/29 seth vidal :
> > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> >>
2011/4/29 seth vidal :
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
>> > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 11:07 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
>> is directly under /.
>
> I guess I missed some discussi
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
> is directly under /.
I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd need to update
libselinux at least, definition of SELINUXMNT in
libselinux/src/polic
commit 2c5ed62890cba7e788e889766d6f75ff99661011
Merge: 05e9519 5c6ad95
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:05:27 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 10 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions
Summary of changes:
06fd3e6... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
8ea50d5... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
b81229d... - Upstream update. - Revert Marcela's 2010-05-04 changes. - (*)
7d922d5... - Rebuild for perl-5.12.x. (*)
d199eb5... dist-git conversion (*)
a30b1c9... - Upstrea
Hi,
On 04/28/2011, Martin Cermak wrote:
>
> On 04/27/2011, Hans De Goede wrote:
> >
> > I'm a sponsor and I would be happy to sponsor you. But first I would like to
> > see slightly more of your packaging skills / understanding of the Fedora
> > packaging guidelines (I already took a quick look
commit 7de2192c2ed9c5c43c762b2030d6d44c34404804
Merge: 64bcb78 5c6ad95
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Fri Apr 29 16:05:46 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 10 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions
Summary of changes:
a30b1c9... - Upstream update. (*)
50ac7d9... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
5c6ad95... Upstream update. (*)
7de2192... Merge.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.
Summary of changes:
5c6ad95... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:19:29 -0400
Andy Grimm wrote:
> Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
>
> I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a
> decade as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat
> and #fedora giving tech support to new users. I first met some of
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:28:15 -0700
Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
> > got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
> > file it there.
>
> How is this any different, gi
Am I the only one having problems with entries in /etc/xdg/autostart not
getting executed in the fallback session? This leads for example to the
fact that policykit authentication does not work, since the
authentication agent is not running.
Thanks
Sandro
On 04/28/2011 05:55 PM, Bastien Nocera
Please read:
http://kparal.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/autoqa-0-4-7-released/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Phillip Lynn wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
> > running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
> > am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not su
Oh! And thanks to Hans for taking me under his wing!
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit 5c6ad956ee98c2a584a3cdcfd0d46524f8dfc590
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:07:51 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 12 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
dif
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Params-Util:
84bfb0a16cff67f2077ece0e24408b0f Params-Util-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 04/29/2011 12:14 AM, Petr Sabata wrote:
> Why don't we let the getaddrinfo() decide in this case as well? It's already
> used in other applications so why not here?
Just to give it some more exposure (somewhat related):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697149
getaddrinfo() sho
Phillip Lynn wrote:
> All,
>
> After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
> running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
> am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not sure where to continue
> looking to try and correct these errors. I h
All,
After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not sure where to continue
looking to try and correct these errors. I have tried gnome and xcfe
desktop
On 04/29/2011 05:43 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>> On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
maintained) than to no
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
> > > maintained) than to not have it at all!
> >
> > I think that's where
On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
> > maintained) than to not have it at all!
>
> I think that's where some of us disagree with you.
>
> Having lots of parts of poo
Compose started at Fri Apr 29 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:14 AM, John Keller wrote:
> Right now the only options, to my knowledge, are to use the netinst
> (hybrid image) or use some special tool/process to convert the DVD ISO
> into a bootable USB key. The former can be flaky (as you mention) and
> the latter is cumbersome (an
On 04/26/2011 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 07:55 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> I decided to reinstall using netinstall.iso.
>
> Just a general note here: during pre-release time netinstall is always
> more likely to have trouble than media install. We test installa
Hi,
On 04/29/2011 12:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been a Fedora user since FC6 and a little RH6 before that. Our
> family pretty much uses Fedora exclusively, including my desktop,
> MythTV box, and wife's laptop. The wife's laptop can still dual boot
> Vista, but she never uses it
Hi,
On 04/29/2011 01:19 AM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
>
> I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a decade
> as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat and #fedora
> giving tech support to new users. I first met some of these fi
77 matches
Mail list logo
