On 9 March 2011 06:37, Sven Lankes wrote:
> After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
> huge number of packages.
>
Must have been some dispute. It's a shame it couldn't be resolved.
> I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't
> missed any.
After a dispute on the #fedora-kde IRC channel thomasj has orphaned a
huge number of packages.
I extracted the list from scm-commits emails so I hope that I haven't
missed any.
The following packages are in need of new owners:
luckybackup
xine-ui
vor
stfl
spambayes
six
sentinella
recordmydesktop
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 08:56, Christian Weiß
> wrote:
>>
>> Consider an installation of about ~600 low budget thin-clients (with
>> almost no 3D support from the graphics chip) running as X-Terminals. Those
>> thin-client stations are serv
Till Maas wrote:
> [0] http://jengelh.medozas.de/projects/hxtools/
WTF, that's a hodgepodge of many completely unrelated tools. :-(
Whoever wants to package this will also need to check the tarball for
patent-encumbered stuff, e.g. there are tools working on MP3 files, you have
to check whether
On 8 March 2011 21:26, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to update pam_mount I need some programs of a tool collection from the
> upstream author. The tool collection[0] named hxtools contains a lot of
> stuff I do not want to package. Is there any reason to only package the
> two tools I need and add ot
> "TM" == Till Maas writes:
TM> Is there any reason to only package the two tools I need and add
TM> others whenever someone requests it? Would someone disapprove this
TM> in a package review?
I don't see what would require you to package every piece of
functionality included in a upstream t
I am having trouble getting a response from Alexey again. I am trying to get
access to ember so that I can submit new builds for it (in rawhide right
away, for F15 as soon as the ogre update hits stable). It also has a low
risk security issue that is easy to fix, that is easy to fix, that I'd
like
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #516 Updates policy adjustments/change
Summary of changes:
07c05d5... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*)
9e77551... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
26631ce... Revert to same package as EL-5 branch (*)
0a84bac... Merge branch 'el5' into el4 (*)
(*) This commit already exi
commit 0a84bac8edd7f09a91d51fe6c9f3d4864b89dd77
Merge: 26631ce a243112
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Mar 8 21:28:46 2011 +
Merge branch 'el5' into el4
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec
commit 26631ce8764f08153c891112d5fbdbb0288c2928
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Mar 8 21:28:33 2011 +
Revert to same package as EL-5 branch
perl-Pod-Eventual.spec | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Eventual.spec b/perl-
Summary of changes:
07d62eb... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Pod-Eventual (*)
26976aa... initial import of perl-Pod-Eventual (*)
3e663ce... dist-git conversion (*)
a243112... Merge branch 'el6' into el5 (*)
26631ce... Revert to same package as EL-5 branch
0a84bac... Merge branch 'el5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622436
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483026&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi,
to update pam_mount I need some programs of a tool collection from the
upstream author. The tool collection[0] named hxtools contains a lot of
stuff I do not want to package. Is there any reason to only package the
two tools I need and add others whenever someone requests it?
Would someone dis
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:57 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> After having migrated our project (FreeIPA) I thought I would share some
> info which might help others.
> Any way, hope this helps others who follow, some of this should probably be
> on a wiki page and/or FAQ.
Thanks for your input John -- I
After having migrated our project (FreeIPA) I thought I would share some
info which might help others.
We were already hosted on transifex.net but the project was created
prior to the Transifex 1.0 roll out. For some reason we didn't have a
resource although we previously did have a .pot file a
commit b13ffb87d3a127b27549045291ee5fe3d943285c
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Mar 8 18:22:12 2011 +
Update to 5.502
- New upstream release 5.502:
- Fix parsing bug (CPAN RT#66025)
- Fix typo (CPAN RT#65387)
- Fix unit tests on Perl 5.8.x (CPAN RT#66188)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-tools:
6a87adda74867e3f8868a0599137bde0 MIME-tools-5.502.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 03/08/2011 06:46 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> guile-2.0.0 has been released, there are some important changes.
>
> - The license changed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+.
[...]
> Repoquery lists these packages as using libguile:
[...]
Looks like that could cause some licensing issues:
$ repoqu
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> For more information including features, tips on how to report bugs, and
> the official release schedule, please refer to the release notes:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_release_notes
>
> A list of known bugs in the A
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
> For the record, so you don't try to chase down a bug in your script:
>
>
>
> gnubik-2.3-8.fc15.src.rpm
> gnucash-2.4.3-1.fc16.src.rpm
> gnurobots-1.2.0-8.fc15.src.rpm
Score one for an inability to read on my part, then. Yikes.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said:
>
>> Suggestions? Do we want to keep this in a special rawhide koji target
>> for now?
>>
>
> GnuCash, at least, does not support Guile 2.0 out of the box. We'd have
> to run a patched version. (Not sure why it didn't sh
Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said:
> Suggestions? Do we want to keep this in a special rawhide koji target
> for now?
GnuCash, at least, does not support Guile 2.0 out of the box. We'd have
to run a patched version. (Not sure why it didn't show up in your list
below.)
I'm assuming no p
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:00 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> *** Issues and Details ***
>
> For more information including common and known bugs, tips on how to
> report bugs, and the official release schedule, please refer to the
> release notes:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_rel
Hi,
guile-2.0.0 has been released, there are some important changes.
- The license changed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+.
- The libguile API changed and there were also some changes in the
language itself. Recompiling depending packages (with patching C
code) probably won't be enough, patches for
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 08:56, Christian Weiß wrote:
> Consider an installation of about ~600 low budget thin-clients (with almost
> no 3D support from the graphics chip) running as X-Terminals. Those
> thin-client stations are serviced by a host computer for 25-30 stations
> each. This infrastruct
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683053
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
The Fedora 15 "Lovelock" Alpha release is available! This release
offers a preview of some of the best free and open source technology
currently under development. Catch a glimpse of the future:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
*** What is the Alpha release? ***
The Alpha release contains
On 2011-03-06, Christian Weiß wrote:
> Consider an installation of about ~600 low budget thin-clients (with
> almost no 3D support from the graphics chip) running as X-Terminals.
> Those thin-client stations are serviced by a host computer for 25-30
> stations each. This infrastructure should be t
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'd like to see the contents of the package moved around so that when
>> I install something like banshee I don't need to install mono-devel
>> and have it pull in all the dev packages that I don't need on a
>> netbook that I never use
30 matches
Mail list logo
