Hi,
FYI: I (FAS: kkofler) have handed over maintenance of gnash to Hicham
Haouari (FAS: hicham). I've never been all to fond of maintaining this
package, and I'm also feeling powerless in front of the flood of ABRT
reports, so I'm glad somebody more interested in Gnash is taking it.
Ke
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:58:59AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> >>> Haskell process-leksah library
> >>
> >> Is it not
Hello,
> > rversion=2.1
> > subversion=400
> >
> >
> > Spec file extract:
> > Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion}
> >
> > Source: ./%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
>
> IMO, it would be more clear to separate strictly between upstream version
> (= tarball version) and Fedora packa
On 01/29/2011 10:58 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
Haskell process-leksah library
>>>
>>> Is it not possible to try a lit
On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> That would probably be hard in general. I like to put in URLs to upstream
> announcements and/or change logs into the spec file change log.
>
I didn't see that reply to was just to Mr. Wolff. Here is the msg:
On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolf
On 01/29/2011 03:34 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>>> Haskell process-leksah library
>>
>> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
>> summary? Or for the
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>>> Haskell process-leksah library
>>
>> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
>> summary? Or
Oops. A mistake. Apologies. Would update the summary next time there is a
upstream update.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> > Haskell process-leksah library
>
> Is it not possible to try a little harder to
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:34:33 -0500,
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> Yes, please. Also, "new upstream version" as the only summary is not
> useful either. Can't the summary part be automated so the maintainer
> pushing the change can get the change logs as part of the update process?
That
On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>> Haskell process-leksah library
>
> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
> summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
> notice
>New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> Haskell process-leksah library
Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless?
Hello,
I am orphaning the following packages:
gedit-plugins (I don't own this one)
geglmm
marlin
All the best.
--
Dodji
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sat Jan 29 08:15:49 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.
13 matches
Mail list logo
