Nathanael D. Noblet píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 00:33 -0700:
> On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> >> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> >> years and it is working just fine).
> >> tmp isn't a persis
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
>> years and it is working just fine).
>> tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
>> *not* a dumping
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
>
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts
For Mozilla, see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/C___Portability_Guide#Don%27t_use_exceptions
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593768
Takanori
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
> > Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions f
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
>> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
>> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
>> ...
>> Seems like I should either drop the no
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:02 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
> properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
> set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
> problem.
hum, interesting -
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> > the login manager you can use t
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson wrote:
> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop
> (with panel, not Shell)
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
> What I was more worried about was what happens when sdt.h is included in
> plain C code. Whatever you think of C++ apps that don't play nice with
> , such a complaint is unlikely to impress authors of plain C
> apps.
The only header used by in C is .
(Frankly I can't tell any more why we even
On 01/19/2011 02:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
>> I agree. It's not a great situation, but local GCC/C++ experts have
>> found no better way to type-analyze the parameters, to ensure their
>> safe passage to the tool. (Our testing shows is not
>> offensive t
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> tgl wrote:
>> [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
>> in mysql. [...]
> We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
> and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
Actually, I had just decided that S
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> tgl wrote:
>
> > [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
> > in mysql. [...]
>
> We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
> and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
> >
> > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support f
tgl wrote:
> [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
> in mysql. [...]
We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
> But the real issue here is that systemtap has got to be more chary of
> what they
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > >
> > > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usually shouldn't do
AW> anything with the build root in certain sections of spec files and
AW> so complains if it sees usage of any buildroot definition
AW> ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot) in those sections
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> > > cases, because not all necessar
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
>
> > Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
> > %{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
>
> did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 03:25 PM, Alexander Boström wrote:
> ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
>
>> Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
>
> Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
>
> /Alexander
>
>
/b
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> > cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
> > I hope this issue will be f
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
> Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 18:35 +0100 skrev Karel Zak:
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
> cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
> I hope this issue will be fixed before F15 release.
Is the uhelper option in /proc/mounts?
Reg
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-19)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:35:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-19/fesco.2011-01-19-17.35.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:11:08PM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> > years and it is working just fine).
> > tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
> emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into
the last compose. The fixed build is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
> years and it is working just fine).
> tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
> *not* a dumping ground for giant files (apps that try to do that ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616850
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335&action=edit
Description: Attempting to modify an unknown attribute in the
config entry fails with LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM, whi
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
> Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
> %{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
> renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
>
> The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
> /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
This feature is enabled by default on Fedora (due to sy
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 22:30 +0530, narendr...@dell.com wrote:
> The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI
> add-in network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility.
> It would be great if you could participate and provide your feedback
> which would help us flush b
Hello,
We are conducting a Fedora Rawhide Test Day on "Network Device Naming" on
Thursday, January 27th 2011.
The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI add-in
network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility. It would be great if
you could participate and provi
Mark Wielaard writes:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
>> mysql defines min and max to be macros in my_global.h which conflicts
>> with the definition of max and min in numeric_limits in .
>> This use of max and min is described in the WG14 c++ standard under
>> 18.3.1 Numeric
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:52:24PM +, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Dan Horák danny.cz> writes:
> > there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
> > detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
>
> I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
I g
Tom Lane writes:
> Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
> upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
> -felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
-fexceptions / -frtti are essentially harmless, so I am curious why
they were ever thought to
Dan Horák danny.cz> writes:
> there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
> detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
> mysql defines min and m
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's
a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are
plenty) are being built with -fexcep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: When installed per
/usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts/mysql/mysql_objects-space.sql dspam is missing
tables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Summa
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> hi,
>
> after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
> -fexceptions flag won't change anything.
> -fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
> when compiling C++, then you have to use the
I am using the compile directive
-I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution (and
hence is a better test of the install).
The problem is that rpmlint complains with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 06:22 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
> but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
> saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
>
> Isn't it the
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
fusion-icon-gtk-0.1.
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
> work with ccsm.
well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
with the is
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
> think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
> compiz user base seems split f
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:03 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> > have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> > configuration storage system for so
Paulo Cavalcanti píše v St 19. 01. 2011 v 09:22 -0200:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
> but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
> saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
>
> Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is
Hi,
I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is, one week?
Thanks.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
--
devel mail
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have
> to
> make sure whatever metho
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
e665b64... Update to 1.38
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 16:42:36 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Agenda =
> topics to discuss:
> * keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4. Testing so far as been mixed:
> ** rdieter did quick test against gmail imap: ok
> ** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail, initial sync
> of
53 matches
Mail list logo
