Fedora distribution build times

Greetings! I would like to know as to how long it takes to build a complete Fedora distribution, say i686, from .src.rpms. Are there any statistics available or is it possible to provide any info on the hardware specifications (RAM, number of processors, kernel used etc.), time it takes to build

Re: AF_INET6 sockets and IPv4 connections, etc.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Philip Prindeville < philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > so how can I tell in a couple of lines of code if the connection will > result in IPv4? > I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about. What software are you attempting to patch, for example? B

Re: rawhide report: 20110111 changes

> ghc-Boolean-0.0.1-4.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc(base-4.3.0.0) = > 0:d6f599ffb7445762058e21fe7a79b625 : > ghc-mtl-devel-2.0.1.0-1.fc15.i686 requires ghc-devel(base-4.3.0.0) = > 0:b91367e4fa5bd47d8e75958171ad21b7 > ghc-mtl-devel-2.0.1.0-1.fc15.x86 > > [Message truncated] Apologies for the ongoing gh

Re: Problems building in mock for f14/x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/2011 03:55 PM, Clark Williams wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:45:42 -0500 > Doug Warner wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 > >> On 01/11/2011 04:39 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >>> On 11/01/11 01:13, Doug Warner wrote:

Re: New test case and package test plan creation SOPs in production: call for test cases!

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 18:06 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > In the how-to for categorization > > is prescribed category name format > `Category:Package_(packagename)_test_cases'. However every existing test or > category

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:28 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > After "yum erase"ing rhythmbox (it did hold back some hundreds of updates), > and rebooting into my Gnome/Openbox session (and leaving, the screensaver > kicked in) I found the background flickering. I gave the password to the > screens

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:37:25 -0500 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: ...snip... > > No X did show up. Rebooted by ctrl-alt-del, and tried with plain > > Gnome. No dice either. Rebooted again, now running XFCE4. > > Same for me, also running XFCE. I also created a new/clean user to > see if there was a

Re: Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

On 01/11/2011 05:28 PM, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > After "yum erase"ing rhythmbox (it did hold back some hundreds of updates), > and rebooting into my Gnome/Openbox session (and leaving, the screensaver > kicked in) I found the background flickering. I gave the password to the > screensaver, and t

Rawhide: Gnome totally busted after today's (?) round of updates

After "yum erase"ing rhythmbox (it did hold back some hundreds of updates), and rebooting into my Gnome/Openbox session (and leaving, the screensaver kicked in) I found the background flickering. I gave the password to the screensaver, and the background stabilized, but nothing else (Gnome panels,

EPEL6 moving from Beta to release status soon.

Greetings. Just a heads up that EPEL will soon be moving it's EPEL6 branch from the Beta mode (like rawhide) that it's been in to a release mode (like EPEL4/5 are). (I have cc'ed Fedora's devel-announce here as there may be people not on the epel-devel list that might find this of interest). Ti

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:59:08 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: ...snip... > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, > e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during > the open floor topic

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-01-11)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Note that we may not have quorum, so may adjourn early. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Fo

Re: Problems building in mock for f14/x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:45:42 -0500 Doug Warner wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/11/2011 04:39 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On 11/01/11 01:13, Doug Warner wrote: > >> I'm having a problem under mock 1.1.6 on F13/x86_6

AF_INET6 sockets and IPv4 connections, etc.

Hi. I'm working on a patch to support QoS setting on an IPv4 connection, but I'm being out-clevered by the kernel. The code is doing the following: s = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM); ... sin6.sin6_family = AF_INET6; sin6.sin6_addr = ... // ::: address and then, as the man page says:

[perl-Params-Util/el4/master: 9/9] Merge branch 'el5' into el4

commit b08f58374550c559e0d5e847834d771c910b9030 Merge: b251f66 8afc1d6 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Tue Jan 11 19:32:26 2011 + Merge branch 'el5' into el4 Conflicts: .gitignore --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel ma

Fwd: Outage: Fedora related services 2010-01-11 1900 UTC -> 2300 UTC.

My apologies for forgetting to CC devel on this before the outage started. -- Forwarded message -- From: Stephen John Smoogen Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:01 Subject: Outage: Fedora related services 2010-01-11 1900 UTC -> 2300 UTC. To: Fedora Infrastructure Outage: Rolling up

Re: Problems building in mock for f14/x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/2011 04:39 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 11/01/11 01:13, Doug Warner wrote: >> I'm having a problem under mock 1.1.6 on F13/x86_64 where I can't seem to >> download the repo information for F14/x86_64 (all other releases/arches work >> fine). >

[Bug 668738] EPEL-4 Branch Request

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668738 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-11 13:20:05 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: http

[Test-Announce] quick reminder: bugzappers meeting today

A quick reminder that we have a Bugzappers meeting scheduled for today at 2100 UTC (that's 3hrs 20mins from now). Sorry, I don't have an agenda right now, someone else may supply one. I may only be partially present as I'm going out tonight. thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IR

Re: New test case and package test plan creation SOPs in production: call for test cases!

In the how-to for categorization is prescribed category name format `Category:Package_(packagename)_test_cases'. However every existing test or category uses `Category:(packagename)_test_cases'. E.g.

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

> "ss" == susmit shannigrahi writes: ss> Not sure where it should go inside packaging guidelines. Can anyone ss> else please do that? Packaging guidelines are modified by the packaging committee and are not generally editable. You are welcome to submit a draft for consideration; just create

[Bug 667318] Upgrade to new upstream version

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667318 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

>> Given the size of the wiki, I am surprised that there is no >> documentation in this regard. >> I have started one: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FAQ > > I don't think spreading out the information without any references from > anywhere else is useful.  If this needs to be documented,

Re: Review Swaps

Taking the remaining one: erlang-webmachine. Here is mine (openresolv): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668153 Jiri On 01/10/2011 07:30 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are > Erlang-related): > > * erlang-ebloo

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their > own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require.  That might be the best way > to resolve that. In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss not shipping gtk

[Bug 668738] EPEL-4 Branch Request

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668738 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 668738] New: EPEL-4 Branch Request

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: EPEL-4 Branch Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668738 Summary: EPEL-4 Branch Request Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el4

[Test-Announce] New test case and package test plan creation SOPs in production: call for test cases!

Hi, everyone. Thanks to everyone who sent feedback on the drafts for the test case and package test plan creation SOPs. I have now put these SOPs into production, at the following addresses: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_test_case_creation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_package_test

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:47 PM, susmit shannigrahi > mailto:thinklinux@gmail.com>> > > > Nice, thanks. > Given the size of the wiki, I am surprised that there is no > documentation in this regard. > I have started one: https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re: HEADS UP! Ohloh Fedora repositories

Hello All! 2010/12/14 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello! > > 2010/12/14 Mat Booth : > >> Sorry for the threadcromancy, but I just checked my Ohloh profile >> today and it hasn't registered any of my commits since we switched >> from CVS to Git. Is Ohloh still crushed under the weight of our mighty >> distr

Re: libev updated to 4.01, an API bump

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:52:17AM -0500, Michal Nowak wrote: > libev was updated in Rawhide to 4.01, API bumped from 3.0.0 to 4.0.0. > i3 and picviz packages need rebuild, maintainers Cc-ed, bugs created. This ought to affect ocaml-lwt as well. I noticed that it was including so I assume it mus

Package review report for year 2010!

Total Reviews done: 1819 Merge reviews done: 167 New package reviews done: 1652 Following is the list of folks who completed more then 10 review requests in previous year. Thank you all for contributing extensively to review process during 2010. Name: Parag AN(पराग) : 159 Mamoru Tasaka : 128 Ale

Re: Problems building in mock for f14/x86_64

On 11/01/11 01:13, Doug Warner wrote: > I'm having a problem under mock 1.1.6 on F13/x86_64 where I can't seem to > download the repo information for F14/x86_64 (all other releases/arches work > fine). > > The root.log is here: > http://pastebin.com/irkWhjtg > > For some reason it seems like yum ca

libev updated to 4.01, an API bump

libev was updated in Rawhide to 4.01, API bumped from 3.0.0 to 4.0.0. i3 and picviz packages need rebuild, maintainers Cc-ed, bugs created. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel