biosdevname v0.3.4

2010-12-16 Thread Matt Domsch
biosdevname, now version 0.3.4. The main visible change is that port indices now start at 1 rather than 0, when assigned by biosdevname (such as falling back to PIRQ) rather explicitly assigned by BIOS. This is in keeping with how the indices are assigned by BIOS on Dell and HP servers. em

Re: Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:40:39PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > The following packages have been orphaned in Fedora 13, 14, and devel: > > [snip] > > > latexmk -- A make-like utility for LaTeX files > > Er, hold on there. I'm the main

Re: Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > The following packages have been orphaned in Fedora 13, 14, and devel: [snip] > latexmk -- A make-like utility for LaTeX files Er, hold on there. I'm the maintainer for that package; mef was comaintainer. Anyway, it looks like it is n

[perl-Getopt-ArgvFile] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 0f58881ac1ff6f643b3e321d873393a8aa0be90a Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 23:07:28 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Getopt-ArgvFile.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Getopt-Argv

Re: Safest way to go from x86 to x86_64

2010-12-16 Thread Benny Amorsen
Paul Johnson writes: > Is there a safe way to install the x86_64 system over the 32 bit version > and then clean off the 32 bit stuff that is no longer needed? There is no safe way to do it, but it IS in fact possible. I have done it twice. It is a lot of work, and I recommend against it. Howev

[perl-Geo-Inverse] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 9bd0a436d17a0dc096ee62035b1fb0b02479709b Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 22:50:30 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Geo-Inverse.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Geo-Inverse.spe

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/16/10 1:20 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:28 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: >>> An alternative approach would be to mirror the semantics of tag >>> inheritance by having builds use multiple yum repositories, possibly >>> with p

[Bug 663803] New: CVE-2010-3438 perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all]

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2010-3438 perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=66380

[Bug 663801] CVE-2010-3438 perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663801 Vincent Danen changed: What|Removed |Added -

[perl-Geo-Constants] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 273383d1ff2ab1ccf206bd9f9c1c7a2632fefcae Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 22:22:03 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Geo-Constants.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Geo-Constants

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:28 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > An alternative approach would be to mirror the semantics of tag > > inheritance by having builds use multiple yum repositories, possibly > > with priorities, instead of explicitly computing the

[Bug 663801] CVE-2010-3438 perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF

2010-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663801 Vincent Danen changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 15:50 -0500: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:53PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Especially minor changes that don't bring any measurable benefit > > (perhaps making the system "cleaner" or making programmer's life more > > convenient) but require time from e

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Casey Dahlin
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:53PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience > > > and knowledge of thousands

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:32 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > After this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340 > > > > I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough. > > > > So, I'm orphaning syste

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Matt Domsch
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > After this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340 > > I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough. > > So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to take care of > it I'm going to i

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: >>> (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a >>> buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's >>> onl

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread Severin Gehwolf
- "Mat Booth" wrote: > > That is what I am also thinking. As it was said earlier, that a > stand > > alone version for Fedora Eclipse Packager can be made, we should > start > > working on that. The code already exists for the backend. We can > > design a GUI with gtk+ and put all the features

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a > > buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's > > only one dependent package, unless that would put

[perl-FreezeThaw] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 03c59e913b6089f5475ece4de993ebd8053ac3bd Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 21:16:52 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-FreezeThaw.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-FreezeThaw.spec

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a > buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's > only one dependent package, unless that would put some kind of strain on > the infrastructure. Is a request for a

[perl-Format-Human-Bytes] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit a2435359e609130ae8fb2b2a8773eb14d3417198 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 21:11:19 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Format-H

[perl-Font-AFM] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit cea45b4e501f623b4b43466739a23daa88d09128 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 20:45:48 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Font-AFM.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Font-AFM.spec b/pe

[perl-forks] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 106552bb891dbcada816cf6b89ecd633cb05438a Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 21:03:00 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-forks.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-forks.spec b/perl-for

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread nodata
On 14/12/10 04:38, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi, > I've been thinking for sometime now for a GUI for the Fedora Packagers. There > are some steps during the packaging life cycle which needs to be repeated > again and again. So, I was thinking of having some kind of one click system > for updati

[perl-Font-TTFMetrics] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit e5b3a8b1b36655e7a0b27446762c360090f3e5cc Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 20:57:19 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Font-TTFMetrics.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Font-TTFMet

[perl-Font-TTF] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 8bdf172bcf48584008163300fabe9112d931b0fa Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 20:52:07 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Font-TTF.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Font-TTF.spec b/pe

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience > > > and knowledge of thousands of Unix

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 09:38:08 pm Thursday, December 16, 2010 Mat Booth wrote: > On 16 December 2010 17:09, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > >> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works > >> quite well, thanks for the effort th

[perl-Finance-YahooQuote] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 21f7005b564cad283849975b56b211394d7a036b Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 20:29:06 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Finance-YahooQuote.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Finance-

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread Mat Booth
On 16 December 2010 17:09, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote: >> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works >> quite well, thanks for the effort that has gone into it. >> > > +1 > >> My life revolves around Eclipse at my

[perl-File-Which] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 562cfcf65e0ff925a8c85655178b17f70d374442 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 20:23:56 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-Which.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-Which.spec

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience > > and knowledge of thousands of Unix system administrators. Almost of > > all of them do not even re

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-16 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 23:57 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > But how many packages nowadays require a man page reader simply because > > they install man pages? > > Well, since it's a guideline, it's worth discussion. Sure there's only > 18 in your li

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:11 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 06:00 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 > >>> Chris Adams wrote: > >>> > Once

[perl-File-ReadBackwards] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 90ea1ca259ff68fb8b39fc080c2085d322549810 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 19:13:40 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-ReadBackwards.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-Rea

[perl-File-Read] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 1d1eb61c1392c82f9c71f55dd1905bc2b8fe727e Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 19:08:22 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-Read.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-Read.spec b/

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:54 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Just a thought:

[perl-File-Pid] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 05e8108ba1cbbff60180bc810715bbc10df244de Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 18:57:09 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-Pid.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-Pid.spec b/pe

Re: Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
I'm CC'ing comaintainers of the affected packages. On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:52:22PM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have > already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related) > packages in Fedora. However, just to make it fo

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of "expir

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of > >> "expiration"/"best before" date, which yum etc. could u

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I think I'll chan

Re: Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi! Just in case someone is looking for the list of her packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mef I don't have time to do any of these. However, I would love to see someone taking over gernonimo*, ice, jarjar, javamail, maven*, pl... - at least Mary. Take your tim

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future

[perl-File-MMagic-XS] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 690e2b93abd8ebbea8ff598e83db6cfc384645bf Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 18:24:34 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-MMagic-

[perl-File-MimeInfo] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 65b2ea071c448a8f2673ebd24933efff89e6392f Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 18:14:09 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-MimeInfo.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-MimeInfo

Re: Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:52:22PM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have > already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related) > packages in Fedora. However, just to make it formal: due to a > combination of work and personal ci

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then >>> when I invent some spare time, work on some of the

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 06:00 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 >>> Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: > Note that I am not say

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread Ratnadeep Debnath
Hi, On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works > quite well, thanks for the effort that has gone into it. > +1 > My life revolves around Eclipse at my day job so using this plug-in > wasn't a leap, but I've found tha

[perl-File-HomeDir] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 7bf485a59dd70dec852802da6348485ed2dad718 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 18:08:40 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-HomeDir.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-HomeDir.s

[perl-FileHandle-Unget] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit b674c180592f3f4570afd81ba87827109ea6ff37 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 18:02:59 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-FileHandle

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 > > Chris Adams wrote: > > > >> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: > >>> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as > >>

[perl-FileHandle-Fmode] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit d650983a15b9a99fbca8a83d828464f3344d72e3 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 17:57:33 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-FileHandle

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 > Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: > > > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as > > > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-t

Re: Why do package pushes to testing take so long?

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 05:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:23 +0100 > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> Hi, I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in >>> f13/testing and f14/testing. >>>

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 > Chris Adams wrote: > >> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: >>> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as >>> they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There >>>

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: > > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as > > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There > > is a difference. There will still be reasons to

Re: Why do package pushes to testing take so long?

2010-12-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:23 +0100 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in > > f13/testing and > >> f14/testing. > >> > >> Any particular rationale behind this? > >

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 03:35 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1 work. > > Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear > in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of > updates-testing.

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Casey Dahlin
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:21:25AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Jeez. Tha's just FUD. Of course we have discussed this openly with > > various folks. We haven't discussed this with you, Rich, personally, but > > well, I'l

Re: Why do package pushes to testing take so long?

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in > f13/testing and >> f14/testing. >> >> Any particular rationale behind this? > > I think it has something to do with the announcement sent a > little earlier: >

[perl-File-DesktopEntry] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 3258601f68b76d3931291e153c55b12dc76e5490 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 17:07:07 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-File-DesktopEntry.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-File-Desk

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said: > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There is a > difference. There will still be reasons to use tags/overrides. That makes the push process much more fragi

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 12/16/2010 04:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>> Any opinions on this? >> >> While I see some value in this, poisoning the buildroot is a grave danger >> here. I'd be hesitant to endorse it. >> >> Is this proposal based on any real exampl

Orphaning all of my packages :(

2010-12-16 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related) packages in Fedora. However, just to make it formal: due to a combination of work and personal circumstances, I've had very few cycles for keeping up with Fedora since last

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Any opinions on this? > > While I see some value in this, poisoning the buildroot is a grave danger > here. I'd be hesitant to endorse it. > > Is this proposal based on any real examples of updates-testing pkgs breaking > builds? Perhap

Re: Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1 > work. > > Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear > in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of > updates-testing. I'd like for packages to app

[perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 5f6f179ef23a88d8d80abe1376d97d1dfe616662 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 15:36:09 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-ExtUtil

Adding packages to buildroot directly from updates-testing

2010-12-16 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Hi, I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1 work. Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of updates-testing. I'd like for packages to appear in buildroot as soon as they are

[perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 6b2b5aba02a325edcbe460041e760823ccfab88a Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 15:30:13 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-ExtUti

Re: Why do package pushes to testing take so long?

2010-12-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in f13/testing and > f14/testing. > > Any particular rationale behind this? I think it has something to do with the announcement sent a little earlier: "Outage: Fedora related services down 2010-12-15 22:00

Re: Orphaning system-auto-death

2010-12-16 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then > > when I invent some spare time, work on some of the other ideas for automatic > > determination

[perl-Exporter-Lite] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 0dafbeebe95b4f0ace99a9b4c9c9d07b3e154650 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 15:03:18 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Exporter-Lite.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Exporter-Lite

[perl-Expect-Simple] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit a16d792a753fcc78945638286e394b39c826fe4a Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 14:57:37 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Expect-Simple.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Expect-Simple

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:17:21AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > systemd documentation is actually pretty good and mostly > comprehensive. Humble as I am I would even say that it is vastly > superior to the majority of all open source projects. If you want to > criticise us on something, pick

[perl-Email-Reply] - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib

2010-12-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit d9ac51563d290ee35ab01a3d1babe1d5bf63725c Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Thu Dec 16 13:27:52 2010 +0100 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib perl-Email-Reply.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Email-Reply.spe

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

2010-12-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:21:25AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Jeez. Tha's just FUD. Of course we have discussed this openly with > various folks. We haven't discussed this with you, Rich, personally, but > well, I'll make a note now tht I'll DoS you now with every single > choice we make, t

Why do package pushes to testing take so long?

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in f13/testing and f14/testing. Any particular rationale behind this? Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Another request for comment, dist-git branch proposal

2010-12-16 Thread Michael J Gruber
Jesse Keating venit, vidit, dixit 15.12.2010 23:10: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Branch_Proposal > > I think I'm ready to present this to FESCo for consideration, but I'd > like another round of eyes and thoughts/questions. Thanks! > Maybe along with a micro migration guide: git re

Re: Documenting Fedora's package source control setup

2010-12-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-12-15, Jesse Keating wrote: > I thought I had done this, turns out I didn't. Go me! > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Source_Control > I'd like to see codificated lookaside cache interface (host names, URL's authentication mechanism) and format of `sources' file. In other words

Re: Retired package by mistake - undo?

2010-12-16 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 07:43 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log > > > into pkgdb and claim both