biosdevname, now version 0.3.4.
The main visible change is that port indices now start at 1 rather
than 0, when assigned by biosdevname (such as falling back to PIRQ)
rather explicitly assigned by BIOS. This is in keeping with how the
indices are assigned by BIOS on Dell and HP servers.
em
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:40:39PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > The following packages have been orphaned in Fedora 13, 14, and devel:
>
> [snip]
>
> > latexmk -- A make-like utility for LaTeX files
>
> Er, hold on there. I'm the main
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The following packages have been orphaned in Fedora 13, 14, and devel:
[snip]
> latexmk -- A make-like utility for LaTeX files
Er, hold on there. I'm the maintainer for that package; mef was
comaintainer. Anyway, it looks like it is n
commit 0f58881ac1ff6f643b3e321d873393a8aa0be90a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 23:07:28 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Getopt-ArgvFile.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Getopt-Argv
Paul Johnson writes:
> Is there a safe way to install the x86_64 system over the 32 bit version
> and then clean off the 32 bit stuff that is no longer needed?
There is no safe way to do it, but it IS in fact possible. I have done
it twice.
It is a lot of work, and I recommend against it. Howev
commit 9bd0a436d17a0dc096ee62035b1fb0b02479709b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 22:50:30 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Geo-Inverse.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Geo-Inverse.spe
On 12/16/10 1:20 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:28 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> An alternative approach would be to mirror the semantics of tag
>>> inheritance by having builds use multiple yum repositories, possibly
>>> with p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2010-3438 perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution
due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=66380
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663801
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
commit 273383d1ff2ab1ccf206bd9f9c1c7a2632fefcae
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 22:22:03 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Geo-Constants.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Geo-Constants
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:28 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > An alternative approach would be to mirror the semantics of tag
> > inheritance by having builds use multiple yum repositories, possibly
> > with priorities, instead of explicitly computing the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663801
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 15:50 -0500:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:53PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Especially minor changes that don't bring any measurable benefit
> > (perhaps making the system "cleaner" or making programmer's life more
> > convenient) but require time from e
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:53PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience
> > > and knowledge of thousands
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:32 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > After this bug:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340
> >
> > I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough.
> >
> > So, I'm orphaning syste
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:24:40AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> After this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663340
>
> I realize I'm not remembering to update the EOL date often enough.
>
> So, I'm orphaning system-auto-death. If no one steps up to take care of
> it I'm going to i
On 12/16/10 12:22 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a
>>> buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's
>>> onl
- "Mat Booth" wrote:
> > That is what I am also thinking. As it was said earlier, that a
> stand
> > alone version for Fedora Eclipse Packager can be made, we should
> start
> > working on that. The code already exists for the backend. We can
> > design a GUI with gtk+ and put all the features
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:14 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a
> > buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's
> > only one dependent package, unless that would put
commit 03c59e913b6089f5475ece4de993ebd8053ac3bd
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 21:16:52 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-FreezeThaw.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-FreezeThaw.spec
On 12/16/10 10:29 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> (BTW, it seems that a custom tag would generally be better than a
> buildroot override for the reasons we are discussing even if there's
> only one dependent package, unless that would put some kind of strain on
> the infrastructure. Is a request for a
commit a2435359e609130ae8fb2b2a8773eb14d3417198
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 21:11:19 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Format-H
commit cea45b4e501f623b4b43466739a23daa88d09128
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:45:48 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Font-AFM.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Font-AFM.spec b/pe
commit 106552bb891dbcada816cf6b89ecd633cb05438a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 21:03:00 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-forks.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-forks.spec b/perl-for
On 14/12/10 04:38, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been thinking for sometime now for a GUI for the Fedora Packagers. There
> are some steps during the packaging life cycle which needs to be repeated
> again and again. So, I was thinking of having some kind of one click system
> for updati
commit e5b3a8b1b36655e7a0b27446762c360090f3e5cc
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:57:19 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Font-TTFMetrics.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Font-TTFMet
commit 8bdf172bcf48584008163300fabe9112d931b0fa
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:52:07 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Font-TTF.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Font-TTF.spec b/pe
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 20:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience
> > > and knowledge of thousands of Unix
On 09:38:08 pm Thursday, December 16, 2010 Mat Booth wrote:
> On 16 December 2010 17:09, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> >> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works
> >> quite well, thanks for the effort th
commit 21f7005b564cad283849975b56b211394d7a036b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:29:06 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Finance-YahooQuote.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Finance-
On 16 December 2010 17:09, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works
>> quite well, thanks for the effort that has gone into it.
>>
>
> +1
>
>> My life revolves around Eclipse at my
commit 562cfcf65e0ff925a8c85655178b17f70d374442
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:23:56 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-Which.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Which.spec
Casey Dahlin píše v Čt 16. 12. 2010 v 11:19 -0500:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > What you don't understand is that you are throwing away the experience
> > and knowledge of thousands of Unix system administrators. Almost of
> > all of them do not even re
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 23:57 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> But how many packages nowadays require a man page reader simply because
> > they install man pages?
>
> Well, since it's a guideline, it's worth discussion. Sure there's only
> 18 in your li
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:11 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 06:00 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
> >>> Chris Adams wrote:
> >>>
> Once
commit 90ea1ca259ff68fb8b39fc080c2085d322549810
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 19:13:40 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-ReadBackwards.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Rea
commit 1d1eb61c1392c82f9c71f55dd1905bc2b8fe727e
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 19:08:22 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-Read.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Read.spec b/
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:54 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Just a thought:
commit 05e8108ba1cbbff60180bc810715bbc10df244de
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 18:57:09 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-Pid.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Pid.spec b/pe
I'm CC'ing comaintainers of the affected packages.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:52:22PM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have
> already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related)
> packages in Fedora. However, just to make it fo
On 12/16/2010 06:43 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of
"expir
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:33 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> Just a thought: How about equipping a repo's metadata with some sort of
> >> "expiration"/"best before" date, which yum etc. could u
On 12/16/2010 06:26 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think I'll chan
Hi!
Just in case someone is looking for the list of her packages:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mef
I don't have time to do any of these. However, I would love to see
someone taking over gernonimo*, ice, jarjar, javamail, maven*, pl... -
at least
Mary. Take your tim
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 18:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future
commit 690e2b93abd8ebbea8ff598e83db6cfc384645bf
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 18:24:34 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-MMagic-
commit 65b2ea071c448a8f2673ebd24933efff89e6392f
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 18:14:09 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-MimeInfo.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-MimeInfo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:52:22PM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have
> already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related)
> packages in Fedora. However, just to make it formal: due to a
> combination of work and personal ci
On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then
>>> when I invent some spare time, work on some of the
On 12/16/2010 06:00 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
>>> Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
> Note that I am not say
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works
> quite well, thanks for the effort that has gone into it.
>
+1
> My life revolves around Eclipse at my day job so using this plug-in
> wasn't a leap, but I've found tha
commit 7bf485a59dd70dec852802da6348485ed2dad718
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 18:08:40 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-HomeDir.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-HomeDir.s
commit b674c180592f3f4570afd81ba87827109ea6ff37
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 18:02:59 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-FileHandle
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:49 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
> > Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> >> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
> >>> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as
> >>
commit d650983a15b9a99fbca8a83d828464f3344d72e3
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 17:57:33 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-FileHandle
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
> > > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as
> > > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-t
On 12/16/2010 05:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:23 +0100
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in
>>> f13/testing and
f14/testing.
>>>
On 12/16/2010 05:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
>>> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as
>>> they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There
>>>
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0600
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
> > Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as
> > they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There
> > is a difference. There will still be reasons to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:23 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in
> > f13/testing and
> >> f14/testing.
> >>
> >> Any particular rationale behind this?
> >
On 12/16/2010 03:35 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1 work.
>
> Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear
> in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of
> updates-testing.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:21:25AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Jeez. Tha's just FUD. Of course we have discussed this openly with
> > various folks. We haven't discussed this with you, Rich, personally, but
> > well, I'l
On 12/16/2010 03:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in
> f13/testing and
>> f14/testing.
>>
>> Any particular rationale behind this?
>
> I think it has something to do with the announcement sent a
> little earlier:
>
commit 3258601f68b76d3931291e153c55b12dc76e5490
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 17:07:07 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-File-DesktopEntry.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Desk
Once upon a time, Stanislav Ochotnicky said:
> Note that I am not saying things should go into buildroot as soon as
> they are built, but as soon as they are in updates-testing. There is a
> difference. There will still be reasons to use tags/overrides.
That makes the push process much more fragi
On 12/16/2010 04:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>>> Any opinions on this?
>>
>> While I see some value in this, poisoning the buildroot is a grave danger
>> here. I'd be hesitant to endorse it.
>>
>> Is this proposal based on any real exampl
Other people -- you know who you are, and thank you! :) -- have
already been doing updates to my various (mostly java-related)
packages in Fedora. However, just to make it formal: due to a
combination of work and personal circumstances, I've had very few
cycles for keeping up with Fedora since last
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Any opinions on this?
>
> While I see some value in this, poisoning the buildroot is a grave danger
> here. I'd be hesitant to endorse it.
>
> Is this proposal based on any real examples of updates-testing pkgs breaking
> builds? Perhap
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1
> work.
>
> Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear
> in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of
> updates-testing. I'd like for packages to app
commit 5f6f179ef23a88d8d80abe1376d97d1dfe616662
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 15:36:09 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtil
Hi,
I'd like to propose a small(ish) change to how updates to Fx and Fx-1 work.
Currently we have to wait until package gets to stable for it to appear
in buildroot. IMO this goes against the whole "testing" part of
updates-testing. I'd like for packages to appear in buildroot as soon as
they are
commit 6b2b5aba02a325edcbe460041e760823ccfab88a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 15:30:13 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUti
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in
f13/testing and
> f14/testing.
>
> Any particular rationale behind this?
I think it has something to do with the announcement sent a
little earlier:
"Outage: Fedora related services down 2010-12-15 22:00
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:59:19PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I think I'll change the f15 deadline to very-far-in-the-future, and then
> > when I invent some spare time, work on some of the other ideas for automatic
> > determination
commit 0dafbeebe95b4f0ace99a9b4c9c9d07b3e154650
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 15:03:18 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Exporter-Lite.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Exporter-Lite
commit a16d792a753fcc78945638286e394b39c826fe4a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 14:57:37 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Expect-Simple.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Expect-Simple
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:17:21AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> systemd documentation is actually pretty good and mostly
> comprehensive. Humble as I am I would even say that it is vastly
> superior to the majority of all open source projects. If you want to
> criticise us on something, pick
commit d9ac51563d290ee35ab01a3d1babe1d5bf63725c
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Thu Dec 16 13:27:52 2010 +0100
- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
perl-Email-Reply.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Reply.spe
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:21:25AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Jeez. Tha's just FUD. Of course we have discussed this openly with
> various folks. We haven't discussed this with you, Rich, personally, but
> well, I'll make a note now tht I'll DoS you now with every single
> choice we make, t
Hi,
I am waiting for almost 36 hours for packages to land in f13/testing and
f14/testing.
Any particular rationale behind this?
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jesse Keating venit, vidit, dixit 15.12.2010 23:10:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Branch_Proposal
>
> I think I'm ready to present this to FESCo for consideration, but I'd
> like another round of eyes and thoughts/questions. Thanks!
>
Maybe along with a micro migration guide:
git re
On 2010-12-15, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I thought I had done this, turns out I didn't. Go me!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Source_Control
>
I'd like to see codificated lookaside cache interface (host names, URL's
authentication mechanism) and format of `sources' file.
In other words
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 07:43 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log
> > > into pkgdb and claim both
83 matches
Mail list logo