Hi Mike,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
> -Mike
when running the command I get permission denied errors. do you need
to belong to another group to be able to create a repo?
Gerard
Creating repo d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> As opposed to leaving off a ; which NEVER happens.
I never happens.. if you always use left handed emoticons <-;
-jef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here are the latest results of our python-2.7-rebuilds.
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/python27/python-27-rebuild-errors-20100731-1.html
Build failed in root.log: 25 packages
Build failed in build.log: 38 packages
Build succeeded, but may depend on old python (please check): 45 packages
---
Total :
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 22:39:08 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> Probably related to this I got some broken package dependency warnings emailed
> to me that seem to be for things that weren't rebuilt for F14. Is it safe
> to ignore this batch of warnings?
I see this got answered in another t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/30/10 8:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 22:24:59 -0500,
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> I noticed that the f14 repo from the kernel mirror seems to have only
>> things that are tagged dist-f14 and no inherited stuff. (Note t
Hi,
So with the git conversion, and some use, I was wanting some zsh
completion goodness on fedpkg. Attached is a zsh function file which
should cover just about everything. Also, something like:
# Use local functions
fpath=($fpath $HOME/.zsh/func)
typeset -U fpath
autoload -Uz c
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 22:24:59 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I noticed that the f14 repo from the kernel mirror seems to have only
> things that are tagged dist-f14 and no inherited stuff. (Note that
> while there is kitutuki-0.9.9c-1.fc13.i686.rpm, it's tagged both
> dist-f13 and dist-f14.)
I noticed that the f14 repo from the kernel mirror seems to have only
things that are tagged dist-f14 and no inherited stuff. (Note that
while there is kitutuki-0.9.9c-1.fc13.i686.rpm, it's tagged both
dist-f13 and dist-f14.)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
Jesse Keating wrote, at 07/31/2010 11:36 AM +9:00:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
>> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
>> I can ignor
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 21:07:08 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was unable to find a fingerprint for pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Since the
> risk is low, I'll start doing work and check it retroactively.
>
> I think there should be some comment in the documentation about what the
> project expec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
> I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
> I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
> to
Hello, all:
This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
to do for this?
Regards,
Mamoru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I was unable to find a fingerprint for pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Since the
risk is low, I'll start doing work and check it retroactively.
I think there should be some comment in the documentation about what the
project expects maintainers to do with regard to using it to avoid
man in the middle atta
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 14:25:46 -0700,
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> 617115 :: ON_QA :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: rawhide live spins
> showing black screen instead of syslinux boot menu ::
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617115
Just in case David sees this, this should have bee
Hi, everyone. Just a heads-up to proven testers: now Fedora 14 has been
branched, the proven tester process is in effect for Fedora 14 packages.
Just like Fedora 13, critical path updates for Fedora 14 (even while
it's in development) will require +1 from a proven tester and +1 from
someone differe
OK, an update. I reinstalled F13, added Picasa 3 from the Google repo.
It does run although it triggers tens of SELinux alerts about
mmap_zero on "unknown".
The messages are pretty confusing really, they are complaining about
"unknown", They say I need to change booleans to allow the access and
gi
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:39:25 +0200
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:52:37 +0100
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> I was asked to bring this up here:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595060
> >>
> >>
> >> (http://lists.fe
Dne 30.7.2010 09:48, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
> I only have 2 words for you and everyone who has put so insanely much
> work into this effort for such a long time:
>
>T H A N K Y O U !
Everybody was bitching about CVS for years, so now we all should say to this
+1000
Thank you
--
There is
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:41 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 14:05, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:56 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
> > I also had the same problem with one core using 100% CPU, in
> my case
>
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:26 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> Fedora composes the Final on October 12, but that assumes that we're
> not going to slip one or two weeks as we have for every release of
> Fedora for the last couple years. If we slip, and Mozilla pushes out
> the GA before Final
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 14:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:56 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
> > I also had the same problem with one core using 100% CPU, in my case
> > for Xorg.
>
> I've filed a bug on this -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619889.
> --
>
S
On 07/30/2010 11:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:52:37 +0100
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> I was asked to bring this up here:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595060
>>
>>
>> (http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2010-July/000170.html)
>
> I added a comment t
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:28:11 +0200
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:28:42PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> >> I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
> >> packages,
>
> > There is the non-responsive maintainer policy already.
>
> That policy isn't th
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:03 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > I vote +1.
> >
> > This package is vital. We need to get things going.
> >
> > Orcan
>
> Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14
> I submitted push request.
There's also a fixed pygtk2 awaiting review:
https
I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location
to store packages that users might find interesting.
It's still a bit manual (but coprs should fix that). When the time comes
we'll be able to properly mirror
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:33 -0300, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> Em Sexta-feira 30 Julho 2010, às 09:02:34, você escreveu:
> > On
> 07/30/2010
> 04:09 AM, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> > > Hello Guys
> > >
> > >
> My first
> post here is to present a small utility that maybe will
> > > be
REMINDER: This list must be clear by Tuesday (2010-08-03) to compose the
Fedora 14 Alpha Release Candidate on Thursday (2010-08-05). If blocker
bugs remain open our chances of release on time decrease rapidly.
Here's the latest!
615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: Bruno Wolff III :: booting live
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:52:37 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
> I was asked to bring this up here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595060
>
>
> (http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2010-July/000170.html)
I added a comment there... basically it would be good to know if it's
jus
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:56 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
> I also had the same problem with one core using 100% CPU, in my case
> for Xorg.
I've filed a bug on this -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619889.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616608
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434877&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434877&action=edit
Fix description:
Use the marshall/unmarshall technique for the entryrdn index data.
Introduced sizeushort_internal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619595
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=435442&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=435442&action=edit
Fix Description:
The cause of this problem is the config attribute nsslapd-parent-suffix
was not defined as an att
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
> > Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 30 Jul
On 07/30/2010 03:02 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 7/29/2010 10:55 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
>> based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
>> for
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:49:22AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 01:06 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> > Jesse Keating writes:
> >
> >> I want to build a new libfoo for rawhide:
> >> fedpkg build
> >
> > where can be done local custo
On 7/29/2010 10:55 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
> based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
> for our package specs, patches, and source files. This
On 7/7/2010 4:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [orion] apache-commons-jexl: apache-commons-jexl-javadoc-2.0.1-1.fc14.noarch
Added license to javadoc package
> [orion] BareBonesBrowserLaunch:
> BareBonesBrowserLaunch-javadoc-3.0-1.fc14.noarch
Package is public domain and does not ship a license
On Friday 30 July 2010 20:21:20 seth vidal wrote:
> As opposed to leaving off
a ; which NEVER happens.
Or adding an extra one:
while
(some_condition);
{
do_something;
}
;-)
> -sv
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> >
> > Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
> > isn't true. Firefox 4 could be i
On 07/31/2010 12:54 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> no.
>
> WAY out of scope.
>
> not the least of which b/c we have no index and no way of traversing the
> list of repos there.
That's why I called for a standard way of naming and discovering
repositories dynamically giving an alias.
Rahul
--
devel mai
On 07/31/2010 12:56 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> I was only aware of the October 26 release date before now.
>
> Anyway, here's the Firefox 4 milestone list:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/4/Beta#Milestones
>
> October 15 is when they go into total freeze and produce release
> candidates
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> >
> > Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
> > isn't true. Firefox 4 could be included in Fedora 14, and it should be.
> >
>
> Provide a reference for tha
David Malcolm wrote:
> - configure.ac files that list python 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 but not 2.7
By the way, CMake also had this bug. I fixed cmake (in dist-f14) a while
ago, so stuff using CMake should now work, unless they use their own .cmake
files with the same bug to locate Python (in which cas
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 00:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 12:43 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > Out of convenience of what? You'd have to know:
> > 1. the repo is on repos.fedorapeople.org
> > 2. that the username is 'spot'
> > 3. that the reponame is 'chromium'
> >
> > and then you'd have
On 07/31/2010 12:43 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> Out of convenience of what? You'd have to know:
> 1. the repo is on repos.fedorapeople.org
> 2. that the username is 'spot'
> 3. that the reponame is 'chromium'
>
> and then you'd have to type all of it
>
> instead of just pasting from your webbrowser di
On 30/07/10 20:18, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> Tutorials, printed manuals, etc.
>
> In that case, copying and pasting is rather difficult, don't you think?
Not with an eReader or pdf.
>
> And also, fp:spot/chromium doesn't preclude copying and pasting that
> into the terminal.
>
> Then there a
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > Looking at the script [3], it looks like the indentation of the call to
> > kojisession.tagBuildBypass(target, build) is wrong; it should be guarded
> > by the "if not newer" conditional. Patch attached.
>
> Yuck! T
David Malcolm wrote:
> Looking at the script [3], it looks like the indentation of the call to
> kojisession.tagBuildBypass(target, build) is wrong; it should be guarded
> by the "if not newer" conditional. Patch attached.
Yuck! The joys of an indentation-sensitive language… :-(
Kevin Ko
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:18 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> Tutorials, printed manuals, etc.
>
>
> In that case, copying and pasting is rather difficult, don't you
> think?
>
>
> And also, fp:spot/chromium doesn't preclude copying and pasting that
> into the terminal.
>
>
> Then there a
On 30/07/10 20:11, seth vidal wrote:
>
> or will they more likely do:
> yum-config-manager --add-repo=
>
This one, so much simpler.
Done it twice in the last 2 minutes.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:12 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> >
> > So here's the question:
> >
> > will someone often be doing:
> > yum-config-manager --add-repo=fp:spot/chromium
> >
> >
> > or will they mor
On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
> isn't true. Firefox 4 could be included in Fedora 14, and it should be.
>
Provide a reference for that. Fedora 14 release schedule is
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releas
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 10:42 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 02:13 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > Ok, so trying to update a package (libass) I've noticed a tiny problem:
> > the fedpkg switch-branch does not seem to set up proper track
On 07/30/2010 09:51 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I decided to respond to these emails about Google Applications in a blog
> entry
>
> http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/37067.html
Thanks for addressing this. Specifically about the mmap_zero problem, is
there a way to set mmap_low_allowed only for th
Mike McGrath wrote:
> If Fedora didn't have stability issues I'd be all for it, but we do.
No we don't. Shipping almost-final releases and upgrading them to final ASAP
is something we have successfully done for ages (including for Firefox). It
has always worked out great.
> And part of it is be
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:12 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> So here's the question:
>
> will someone often be doing:
> yum-config-manager --add-repo=fp:spot/chromium
>
>
> or will they more likely do:
> yum-config-m
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > >> On 0
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > >>> in yum-utils ups
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
> > and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
> > are able to be installed without
On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
> and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
> are able to be installed without conflicts.
>
> At the moment, I'm just targeting F-14.
Thanks.
On 07/30/2010 11:36 AM, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 09:14 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
>>> A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
>>> e.g. in .git/config:
>>>
>>> [remote "origin"]
>>> fetch = +r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:57 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
>
> [or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
>
> [master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 09:14 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
> > e.g. in .git/config:
> >
> > [remote "origin"]
> > fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
> > url = git://pk
On 07/30/2010 11:52 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> Regardless, — you have frequently come off as presenting a
> wink-wink-nod-nod kind of approach towards these issues, and I think
> it reflects poorly on the fedora project. I hope you'll discontinue
> it.
Again, I have to disagree. My question
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> Everything I've seen you ask about repos stems from an apparent end goal
>> of 'get rpmfusion onto Fedora systems as much as possible', and consists
>> of attempting to either
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > > Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> > More seriously, can you please stop these constant pleas of 'how can I
> > make Fedora do contributory infringement'? It's getting tiresome to have
> > new 'can we do this? how about this? maybe this?' ideas every couple
> > of weeks.
>
> That's just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 01:49 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> One thing I've never got around to working out how to do in git which
> is different from previous is dealing with branches. Where previously
> it was as simple as changing directories to deal with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:53 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev
> wrote:
>> Hmm... Doesn't seem to be working at all for me.
>>
>> $ fedpkg co verbiste
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bi
On 07/30/2010 11:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Implication: your goal is to get more people on rpmfusion, and you want to
> take any legal loopholes you can find to get there
The wording here makes it seem twisted and I don't think it is. There
are legal constrains in doing certain things an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 09:14 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> Thanks for dist-git -- one step closer to banishing CVS from my life! :)
>
> A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
> e.g. in .git/config:
>
> [remote "origin"]
> fetch =
Am 30.07.10 10:02, schrieb Michal Hlavinka:
> Thanks for your hard work! Could you describe this in more
> details:
> OLD CVS | NEW GIT | Notes
> make tag | N/A | Explicitly tagging
> source states for package builds is no longer necessary.
>
> how this exactly
Each commit has an unique numb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 08:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> fedpkg build
> fedpkg build
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
> args.command(args)
> File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 297, in build
> mymodule.init_k
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Everything I've seen you ask about repos stems from an apparent end goal
> of 'get rpmfusion onto Fedora systems as much as possible', and consists
> of attempting to either have Fedora make changes to accomplish that, or
> to language l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 01:02 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Friday 30 of July 2010 05:55:09 Jesse Keating wrote:
>> ... Wiki
>> pages
> will get filled out as knowledge of how to interact with dist-git
>> starts
> to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Usi
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Once again I want to thank everybody who helped out and for all the
> (continued) patience! I'll be available via email and IRC as much as
> possible the next few days to help anybody with dist-git issues. Look
> for Oxf13 on freenode. Ha
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-07-30/fedora-releng.2010-07-30-17.04.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-07-30/fedora-releng.2010-07-30-17.04.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-07
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 02:13 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Ok, so trying to update a package (libass) I've noticed a tiny problem:
> the fedpkg switch-branch does not seem to set up proper tracking of
> remote branches which then results in (uhm, I'm using git co
On 7/30/2010 1:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
>
> [or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
>
> [master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
>2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>create mode 100644 paraview-3.8.0-py27
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> dramatically. Even in this thread, I have talked about a standard way of
> accessing repositories to make it easier for users, asking remi to make
> Firefox 4 available in repo etc which has nothing to do with RPM Fusion.
Example 1:
Warning - paraphr
Tried to do a commit and seem to be in a bad state:
[or...@orca paraview]$ fedpkg commit -p
[master 6f6d9c7] Add patch to support python 2.7
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 paraview-3.8.0-py27.patch
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating
> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:24 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
> Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way
> through the boost/python havoc.
er... they never went away... What are you seeing?
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 05:43 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 05:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a
>> good start ).
>
> I made:
>
> fedpkg clone python-debian
> cd python-debian
> f
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev
wrote:
> Hmm... Doesn't seem to be working at all for me.
>
> $ fedpkg co verbiste
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
> args.command(args)
> File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 409, in clone
> pyfedpkg
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating
> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 03:06 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Great news!
>
> Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
>
> * Should I use git now?
Yes.
> * May I still use cvs?
read-only
> * If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> https:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
>>
>> I know it's been a
On 07/30/2010 10:05 PM, drago01 wrot
> How is pointing to a domain that points to rpmfusion any different
> than pointing to rpmfusion?
> IANAL but if we can't do the later we can't do the former either ...
There is a precedent in some sense. A level of indirection can make a
difference. It av
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 18:50 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:49 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > in yum-utils upstream you can do:
> > > >
> > > > yum-config-m
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:49 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > > in yum-utils upstream you can do:
> > >
> > > yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place
> > >
> > > or
> > > yum-config-m
On 07/30/2010 10:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Well, there's a massive trojan waiting to happen.
>
> More seriously, can you please stop these constant pleas of 'how can I
> make Fedora do contributory infringement'? It's getting tiresome to have
> new 'can we do this? how about this? maybe this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 01:06 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>
>> I want to build a new libfoo for rawhide:
>> fedpkg build
>
> where can be done local customization like in ~/.cvsextrasrc?
> E.g. I set
>
> | BUILD_CLIENT = ${HOME}/bin/tk
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> >> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
> >> risk etc. pp" ?
> > No. Not even with a note like that.
>
> Instead of a static list of preincluded repos, would it be possible to
> discover repos automatically from a neutral
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 09:40 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> Not even with a note like
>>>
>>> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
>>> risk etc. pp" ?
>> No. Not even with
On 07/30/2010 09:40 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Not even with a note like
>>
>> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
>> risk etc. pp" ?
> No. Not even with a note like that.
Instead of a static list of preincluded repos
Thanks for dist-git -- one step closer to banishing CVS from my life! :)
A git trick I'd like fedpkg to learn is to use separate url/pushurl,
e.g. in .git/config:
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/foo
pushurl =
On 07/30/2010 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Not even with a note like
>
> "The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
> risk etc. pp" ?
No. Not even with a note like that.
~spot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote:
in yum-utils upstream you can do:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://ba
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
