On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, seth vidal <skvi...@fedoraproject.org>wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > >> On 07/30/2010 09:08 PM, seth vidal wrote: > > > >>> in yum-utils upstream you can do: > > > >>> > > > >>> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://baseurl/some/place > > > >>> > > > >>> or > > > >>> yum-config-manager --add-repo=http://path/to/some/foo.repo > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> either will add the repo you want. > > > >> > > > >> That's almost what I want. Can we add a default shortcut for > > > >> repos.fedorapeople.org? So perhaps it can be > > > >> > > > >> yum-config-manager --add-repo fp:spot/chromium > > > >> > > > > > > > > umm. I dunno. I'll have to think about that one. That feels awfully > > > > dodgy to be in an upstream project's code. > > > > > > Perhaps a standard config file for "repo aliases" could be used, then > > > Fedora could provide that config file with aliases for "fp", "remi", > and > > > other known third party repos. (Note: I don't think we would ever be > > > able to include "rpmfusion" in that list, sadly.) > > > > That's what I was thinking - just not sure how much use it will be. > > So here's the question: > > will someone often be doing: > yum-config-manager --add-repo=fp:spot/chromium > > or will they more likely do: > yum-config-manager --add-repo=<paste-url-to-repofile-from-web-browser> > > b/c it sure feels like the latter is more common. > > -sv > > > Out of convenience, the former will be more common.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
