-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost
rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting
confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
for our package specs, patches, and source files. This has been a long
time coming and a massive effort. I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 12:05 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> There will be an outage starting at 2010-07-28 07:15 UTC, which will
> last approximately 48 hours.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTC
I've been asked by FESCo to post this public service announcement :)
We'd just like to remind those who test Fedora, in whatever
way...running a stable release with updates-testing, running Rawhide,
being a proven tester (especially)...that it's best if you test with
SELinux enabled and enforcing.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 03:21:51PM +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> It looks that copr will come soon. I have a question about it.
>
> Could we add some dependencies from other copr repo? Fedora official repo
> sometimes could not offer the latest one but some packages need them.
>
yes. The idea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:04 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Ke
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > 597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: "SELinux is preventing
> > firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide
> > firefox start :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On Wed 28 July 2010 02:38:24 Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've recently come across an selinux issue.
>
> Is this another selinux issue with the package?
The detailed description says exactly why the notice came up, dude. It's not
an SElinux issue, it's a windows-applications-trying-to-do-stupi
Ankur Sinha reported a SELinux message about an unsafe memory access in
Wine.
On 07/28/2010 07:46 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Instead it tells you using this program can be a risk (dangerous?)
> But if you really need this program:
> su
> /usr/sbin/setsebool -P mmap_low_allowed 1
Does that enable
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
> missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
> Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to individual
> fedora-13-spot / fedora-13-mmcgr
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Never mind, turns out this was me trying to use fedpkg 0.5.0 against a
> checkout made for 0.4.2 (against the test environment)
Note that fedpkg 0.5.1 is out now.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 04:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 04:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
>
>> You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.07.2010 22:15, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>
> Just updated to the latest build. 'fedpkg diff' fails with: File
> "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in args.command(args) File
> "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 440, in diff mymodule =
> pyfedpkg.PackageModule(
Hello all,
I am orphaning Glade3, I don't use it at all anymore since I've
transitioned to Qt4 for the most part. There are quite a few bugs open
but a large portion of them are duplicates from abrt that I just never
got around to triaging (hence the orphaning).
There are three co-maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 04:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
>
> You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above to the latest builds. We're
> working on getting the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above to the latest builds. We're
working on getting them pushed out in updates for people.
- --
Jesse Keati
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > ...
> > fedpkg: error: invalid choice: 'push' (choose from 'clog', 'help',
> > 'mockbuild', 'sources', 'diff', 'gimmespec', 'build', 'import',
> > 'verrel', 'loc
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> ...
> fedpkg: error: invalid choice: 'push' (choose from 'clog', 'help',
> 'mockbuild', 'sources', 'diff', 'gimmespec', 'build', 'import',
> 'verrel', 'local', 'prep', 'tag-request', 'clean', 'build_common',
I'd love to kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> But for the typical tasks here we go:
>
> I want to build a new libfoo for rawhide:
> fedpkg clone libfoo
> cd libfoo
>
> fedpkg commit
>
> fedpkg push (this step could be skipped with "fedp
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
>
> I see active build targets in koji for dist-olpc{2,3,4},
> olpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
I see active build targets in koji for dist-olpc{2,3,4},
olpc2-{ship2,trail3,update1}. Are you saying we could remove all of
the
Kevin Fenzi said the following on 07/28/2010 10:08 PM Pacific Time:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
>> John Poelstra wrote:
>> 597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: "SELinux is
>> preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable."
>> crashes rawhide firefox start ::
Am Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:31:39 +0200
schrieb Thomas Spura :
> Hi list,
>
> with a recent rpmlint, there will be a new warning
> 'private-shared-object-provides'. This will always trigger a *.so file
> inside of %{python_sitearch} as a wrong dependency:
> """
> A shared object soname provides is pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:51 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Option C:
>> fedpkg clone -B libfoo
>> cd libfoo/f13/
>
> This doesn't seem to work... perhaps because of the transition?
>
> http://fpaste.org/F
On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Option C:
> fedpkg clone -B libfoo
> cd libfoo/f13/
This doesn't seem to work... perhaps because of the transition?
http://fpaste.org/FV5g/
If I can get this working, I'd be willing to help write wiki pages. :)
~spot
--
devel mailing list
deve
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/23/2010 11:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:18 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> wrote:
>> This may be a dumb question (I'm full of dumb questions sometimes),
>
> Even dumber question. Are bugzilla fedora-cvs flags getting renamed?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:10 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 02:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Over 10K repos have been converted, but I do have to run a script over
>> those repos and make sure the conversion actually "succeeded". We've
>> also
Hello my Fedora friends!
Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be
compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are
different types of talking points for different types of people:
general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins. For the
F
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> This may be a dumb question (I'm full of dumb questions sometimes),
Even dumber question. Are bugzilla fedora-cvs flags getting renamed?
And do we need to make "New Package Git Requests" now?
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 07/29/2010 02:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Over 10K repos have been converted, but I do have to run a script over
> those repos and make sure the conversion actually "succeeded". We've
> also gotten dist-f14, dist-f13, dist-f12, and el6 in a state that we can
> build with, however we do have t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> The conversion will take a couple d
On 07/28/2010 06:11 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> Fedora just can't
>> include ffmpeg for obvious reasons,
>
> How many more years are we talking about for ffmpeg?
>
> Speaking of which, when can we include a mp3 decoder library in
> Fed
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
>> outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish there was anothe
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:17 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Yesterday, July 27, 2010, we reached Feature Freeze for Fedora 14
>
> As previously noted, at Feature Freeze it is expected that all features
> are *significantly* "feature complete" and ready for testing:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 02:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
>> John Poelstra wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
>>> Days until Release Candidate Comp
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:08:13 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
> John Poelstra wrote:
>
> > 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images
> > from nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) ::
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:33:46 -0700,
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> 615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images from
> nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) ::
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443
> --This bug was reported on July 16, 2010, coming up
On 07/28/2010 11:13 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 17:00:01 -0500,
>"Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)" wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Adam Williamsonwrote:
>>
>> That is assuming that "the other repo" uses the same name as Fedora's.
>> Fedora could call it ffmpeg-free, an
It looks that copr will come soon. I have a question about it.
Could we add some dependencies from other copr repo? Fedora official repo
sometimes could not offer the latest one but some packages need them.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:14 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:10 -0700, D
40 matches
Mail list logo
