F-13 yum in kvm or vmware guests

2010-05-05 Thread Warren Togami
(10/12): samba-3.5.2-60.fc13.x86_64.rpm (71%) 73% [- ] 0.0 B/s | 3.7 MB 3340883129410265958989882401668816722716705737932:48 ETA Anyone else seeing this kind of behavior with F-13 yum within kvm or vmware guests? It seems to happen consistently h

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 05/06/2010 01:28 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > - "Ivana Varekova" wrote: > > >> Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my >> >> point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. >> Ivana >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https:

Do you have a touchpad with up/down or left/right buttons?

2010-05-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Some (mainly older ones, afaict) touchpads have additional buttons to the usual LMR set. These buttons are usually used for up/down and left/right scrolling. Something like this: http://www.hardwarezone.com/img/data/articles/2002/591/touchpad_keyboard.jpg If you own a laptop with such a touchpad,

Re: chrony as default NTP client?

2010-05-05 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Mail Lists said: > Aside - I also dont understand the motivation to start again and > reimplement the wheel all over again ... and not take advantage of a > mature product and work to improve ntpd or enhance it. The project goals are different. Ntpd is designed for long-uptim

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> An anonymous database is easy to ignore by packagers. I fear that that >> might turn to something as useless as pulseaudio. > > > The little jab at pulseaudio is extremely inappropriate and

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Eric Sandeen
Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) said: >>> This is useful enough that it is worth considering for inclusion >>> in /etc/profile. >> See the 'debugmode' package. > > Neat, I wasn't aware of that package. which is

Re: chrony as default NTP client?

2010-05-05 Thread Tom Lane
Mail Lists writes: > On 05/05/2010 09:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to >> NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to >> replace ntpd in the default configuration and the configurations >> supported by system-con

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) said: > > This is useful enough that it is worth considering for inclusion > > in /etc/profile. > > See the 'debugmode' package. Neat, I wasn't aware of that package. Turns out it's broken because the e

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:01 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > Clarification please, how does redundancy fit under the Hall Monitor Policy? > > > > The basis of the Hall Monitor Policy is: > > > > The Fedora Board has adopted a simple motto for general behavior as a > > member > > of the Fedora Proje

Re: chrony as default NTP client?

2010-05-05 Thread Mail Lists
On 05/05/2010 09:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to > NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to > replace ntpd in the default configuration and the configurations > supported by system-config-date. > Strong NO v

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ding Yi Chen
- "Ivana Varekova" wrote: > Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my > > point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. > Ivana > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Has man-p

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > An anonymous database is easy to ignore by packagers. I fear that that > might turn to something as useless as pulseaudio. The little jab at pulseaudio is extremely inappropriate and absolutely non-constructive to the discussion at a hand. S

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> I understand. But please respect what others are thinking. I do see a >> problem in abrt that it wastes my time. > > It's not possible for you to simply ignore the abrt bugs?  I filter > th

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > I understand. But please respect what others are thinking. I do see a > problem in abrt that it wastes my time. It's not possible for you to simply ignore the abrt bugs? I filter the [abrt] ticket email into a separate folder for example so

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > I understand. But please respect what others are thinking. I do see a > problem in abrt that it wastes my time. To stem another abrt thread; see earlier one here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2009-November/msg01487.html Ba

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Can we just disable abrt on Fedora until it figures how to file bugs >> upstream? What is the procedure to propose this? Does this have to go >> through FESCo? > > that's a bit drastic. I

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Can we just disable abrt on Fedora until it figures how to file bugs > upstream? What is the procedure to propose this? Does this have to go > through FESCo? that's a bit drastic. I don't want abrt disabled on my packages. I'm willing to mak

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) said: > This is useful enough that it is worth considering for inclusion > in /etc/profile. See the 'debugmode' package. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Hmm, this is what I did this a couple times, i.e. I forward the >> backtrace to upstream without including any other information, since >> the user does not provide any. >> >> What I receive from upstream is that they nee

Re: evolution icon missing

2010-05-05 Thread Mike Chambers
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:50 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > > The "mark the selected messages as not junk" icon is now missing after > > this morning (last night?) 's updates. > > I think its fixed in updates-testing in the push that was just

Re: Page flipping on intel (2.11 driver)

2010-05-05 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/5/2 Owen Taylor : > With the 2.11 update for xorg-x11-drv-intel in updates-testing we have a > couple of serious problems occurring with gnome-shell on Intel systems: > >  A) A complete hang where the system can't even be pinged. > >  B) A problem where the system continues to run fine but the

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Adam Miller
I use it as well. It's extremely useful. -AdamM (from Android ) On May 5, 2010 1:27 PM, "Juan Rodriguez" wrote: On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 5 May 2010 11:3... I tested the CLI version too for F12->F13 during the test day. I think its needed for remote mainte

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Juan Rodriguez
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 5 May 2010 11:31, Milos Jakubicek wrote: > >> I use it quite regularly for updating my machines > > +1 but don't have time *now* (=until F13 release) to fix it. Please keep > > it if only possible. > > Okay, message heard load and clear.

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Mittwoch, den 05.05.2010, 13:54 -0400 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler: > Jeff Spaleta writes: > > > [...] > >> Stating something like this clearly on login & install would be nice, > >> not just for this MALLOC_PERTURB_ change but in general. > > > > Doesn't this whole discussion about debugging vers

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Good point.  Clearly though one can't delay the setting of the final > release behaviors too long, or else *those* won't get tested. I'm not arguing about what that point should be. I'm just saying that this glib debugging stuff should syn

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Jeff Spaleta writes: > [...] >> Stating something like this clearly on login & install would be nice, >> not just for this MALLOC_PERTURB_ change but in general. > > Doesn't this whole discussion about debugging versus performance also > apply to F13 pre-release testing as well.. and not just raw

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 05/05/2010 12:42 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Agreed, I'm tired of (insert random benchmarking site) saying "OH NOES! >> Fedora got SLOWER AGAIN!" when it's really a lot of debug going on. >> >> Stating something like this clearly on login & i

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Agreed, I'm tired of (insert random benchmarking site) saying "OH NOES! > Fedora got SLOWER AGAIN!" when it's really a lot of debug going on. > > Stating something like this clearly on login & install would be nice, > not just for this MALLOC_P

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 05/05/2010 12:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 18:24 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> On Wed, 05 May 2010 17:30:29 +0200 Jim Meyering wrote: >>> I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile, >>> or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh: >>> >>>

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 18:24 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, 05 May 2010 17:30:29 +0200 Jim Meyering wrote: > > I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile, > > or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh: > > > > # Enable glibc's malloc perturbing feature in R

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Jim Meyering
Michal Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, 05 May 2010 17:30:29 +0200 Jim Meyering wrote: >> I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile, >> or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh: >> >> # Enable glibc's malloc perturbing feature in Rawhide. >> # http://udrepper.livejou

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Wed, 05 May 2010 17:30:29 +0200 Jim Meyering wrote: > I propose (seriously, now) to add this to /etc/profile, > or to some always-sourced file like /etc/profile.d/glibc.sh: > > # Enable glibc's malloc perturbing feature in Rawhide. > # http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html > re

Re: Page flipping on intel (2.11 driver)

2010-05-05 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 01:33:16PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > These problems seem to be associated in particular with the "page > flipping" functionality that it enables. (The implementation is mostly > in the kernel, but the use is driven by the X server.) Xorg Intel driver has been unpushed a

Re: FYI: NVR issues from f12 -> f13

2010-05-05 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 5 May 2010, James Antill wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 23:53 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> On Tue, 4 May 2010, John Reiser wrote: >> Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. >>> >>> Text search is powerful, but a sorted list is even better. >>> >> >> Th

Re: FYI: NVR issues from f12 -> f13

2010-05-05 Thread James Antill
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 23:53 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2010, John Reiser wrote: > > >> Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. > > > > Text search is powerful, but a sorted list is even better. > > > > The script I wrote to make this list is here: >

KDE-SIG meeting report (18/2010)

2010-05-05 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE Summary

rpms/perl-File-Remove/devel perl-File-Remove.spec,1.29,1.30

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Remove/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19924 Modified Files: perl-File-Remove.spec Log Message: * Sat May 01 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1.42-5 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-File-Remove.spec =

rpms/perl-File-Flat/devel perl-File-Flat.spec,1.16,1.17

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Flat/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19685 Modified Files: perl-File-Flat.spec Log Message: * Sat May 01 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1.04-6 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-File-Flat.spec ===

rpms/perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl/devel perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl.spec, 1.14, 1.15

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18931 Modified Files: perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl.spec Log Message: * Sat May 01 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1.09-4 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Fi

rpms/perl-Email-Simple/devel perl-Email-Simple.spec,1.21,1.22

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Email-Simple/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18448 Modified Files: perl-Email-Simple.spec Log Message: * Sat May 01 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 2.005-6 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Email-Simple.sp

Re: FYI: NVR issues from f12 -> f13

2010-05-05 Thread Thomas Woerner
On 05/04/2010 11:21 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. > I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might > make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates. > > greater for f12: rawtherapee > f12 = rawth

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Jim Meyering
H. Guémar wrote: >> This is useful enough that it is worth considering for inclusion > in /etc/profile. > > during development cycle: +1 > for stable/production release: not so much (users would hate us for that) It's definitely not suitable for everyone. My suggestion was intended to be provocati

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:01 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > If you are into development on glibc-based systems > and do not set MALLOC_PERTURB_ to a nonzero value, then you > are missing an easy opportunity to detect subtle bugs early. > > Sure, you can use valgrind, and it will detect whatever a > M

F-13 Branched report: 20100505 changes

2010-05-05 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed May 5 09:15:03 UTC 2010 New package loggerhead Web viewer for the Bazaar version control system New package python-greenlet Lightweight in-process concurrent programming New package rhythmbox-equalizer An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox New pack

rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-Module-Signature.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.9, 1.10

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-5 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20407/EL-5 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources Log Message: * Wed May 5 2010 Paul Howarth - 0.63-1 - Update to 0.63 - Fix Makefile.PL d

rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-4 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Module-Signature.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-4 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20407/EL-4 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources Log Message: * Wed May 5 2010 Paul Howarth - 0.63-1 - Update to 0.63 - Fix Makefile.PL d

chrony as default NTP client?

2010-05-05 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to replace ntpd in the default configuration and the configurations supported by system-config-date. I'm proposing to add a support for chrony to system-config-date and cha

rawhide report: 20100505 changes

2010-05-05 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed May 5 08:15:09 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11 almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8 anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Richard Hughes
On 5 May 2010 11:31, Milos Jakubicek wrote: >> I use it quite regularly for updating my machines > +1 but don't have time *now* (=until F13 release) to fix it. Please keep > it if only possible. Okay, message heard load and clear. Thanks guys. I'll try to port some of the fixes to the CLI version

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Milos Jakubicek
On 5.5.2010 12:17, Dan Horák wrote: > >> Does anyone still use preupgrade-cli or can I remove it from the next >> upstream release? If anyone is that interested in it, could you >> possibly help fix it up and maintain it? Thanks. > > I use it quite regularly for updating my machines +1 but don't

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/5/5 Richard Hughes : > I've spent quite a bit of time fixing up preupgrade this cycle, and > all our QA tests so far have concentrated on preupgrade-gtk, the > graphical component. I've not even tested preupgrade-cli (the command > line version) this cycle, and it seems to have bitrotten

rpms/perl-Module-ExtractUse/devel perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec, 1.7, 1.8

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-ExtractUse/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10344 Modified Files: perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec Log Message: * Mon May 03 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 0.23-5 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Modul

Re: preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Dan Horák
Richard Hughes píše v St 05. 05. 2010 v 11:03 +0100: > I've spent quite a bit of time fixing up preupgrade this cycle, and > all our QA tests so far have concentrated on preupgrade-gtk, the > graphical component. I've not even tested preupgrade-cli (the command > line version) this cycle, and it s

preupgrade-cli

2010-05-05 Thread Richard Hughes
I've spent quite a bit of time fixing up preupgrade this cycle, and all our QA tests so far have concentrated on preupgrade-gtk, the graphical component. I've not even tested preupgrade-cli (the command line version) this cycle, and it seems to have bitrotten far more than the gtk counterpart. Doe

Re: 10 Remaining F13Blocker bugs

2010-05-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote: >> > Greetings folks, >> > >> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the >> > release candidate phase thi

Re: evolution icon missing

2010-05-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > The "mark the selected messages as not junk" icon is now missing after > this morning (last night?) 's updates. I think its fixed in updates-testing in the push that was just published to the list. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.f

Re: 10 Remaining F13Blocker bugs

2010-05-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote: > > Greetings folks, > > > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the > > release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010. In order to enter > > this phase, a

Re: use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread H . Guémar
> This is useful enough that it is worth considering for inclusion in /etc/profile. during development cycle: +1 for stable/production release: not so much (users would hate us for that) regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

evolution icon missing

2010-05-05 Thread Mike Chambers
The "mark the selected messages as not junk" icon is now missing after this morning (last night?) 's updates. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

use MALLOC_PERTURB_ ... or lose

2010-05-05 Thread Jim Meyering
If you are into development on glibc-based systems and do not set MALLOC_PERTURB_ to a nonzero value, then you are missing an easy opportunity to detect subtle bugs early. Sure, you can use valgrind, and it will detect whatever a MALLOC_PERTURB_ setting would have caught, and more, but it's far mo

rpms/perl-Pod-Tests/devel perl-Pod-Tests.spec,1.12,1.13

2010-05-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Tests/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23416 Modified Files: perl-Pod-Tests.spec Log Message: * Tue May 04 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1.19-5 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Pod-Tests.spec ===

Re: FYI: NVR issues from f12 -> f13

2010-05-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 16:21:54 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm. > I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might > make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates. > > greater for f12: rb_libto

Re: Please move your ABRT bugs upstream

2010-05-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 00:36, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> Hmm, this is what I did this a couple times, i.e. I forward the >>> backtrace to upstream without including any other information, since >>> the user does not pro

Re: popularity package context on fedora

2010-05-05 Thread Christof Damian
I would find it interesting too. Not only about the usage of my packages, but it might also be interesting to know what packages are installed from other repositories (fusion, adobe, skype, remi, ...) . I think it would help to make decisions about what packages to keep supporting or include in th