Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> You could probably package up libbsd for inclusion:
> http://libbsd.freedesktop.org/wiki/
>
That's exactly the kind of thing I was hoping to find. I've submitted a
package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Thanks!
Eric
--
devel mail
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Consider taking out /usr from your fstab and to check how far you can get.
> With /sbin/lspci you will be able to check your pci setup, with
> /usr/sbin/lspci, you wouldn't.
False. /sbin/lspci doesn't work without libpci.so, which is in
/
On 01/28/2010 04:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
>> On 01/27/2010 02:17 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>>> Do you think moving this is a bad idea?
>> Yes.
>>
>> The pciutils are valuable tools when trying to recover from situations
>> when "things go utterly wrong".
Paul W. Frields said the following on 01/28/2010 05:53 PM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:50:31PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 12:00 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
>>> A friendly reminder that yesterday, January 26, 2010, we reached the
>>> Feature and Spin submiss
On 01/28/2010 07:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:10 -0500, Patrick Dignan wrote:
>
>
>> I'll take nautilus-python. I spoke with upstream to confirm they had no
>> intention of picking it up.
>>
> Please rebuild the latest version (it requires a trivial re-diff o
On 01/28/2010 09:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
> strlcpy()?
Besides patching it to not use strlcpy? :)
> Is there a Fedora library that provides strlcpy() and friends?
Besides glib, no. You could probably package up libbsd for
What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
strlcpy()?
Is there a Fedora library that provides strlcpy() and friends?
Should I add an implmentation of strlcpy() to the package as an
additional source or patch?
Should I modify the program to not need strlcpy()? (I reall
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:50:31PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 12:00 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
> > A friendly reminder that yesterday, January 26, 2010, we reached the
> > Feature and Spin submission deadline. Any new features or spins
> > submitted after yesterday wi
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:10 -0500, Patrick Dignan wrote:
> I'll take nautilus-python. I spoke with upstream to confirm they had no
> intention of picking it up.
Please rebuild the latest version (it requires a trivial re-diff of the
patch) and disable the eel2 buildrequire (it's no longer neede
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 19:04 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >> Steve Dickson writes:
> >>
> >> > I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I have been on both sides of these bugs... S
Jesse Keating writes:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
> I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
>
> I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
> when you push something out that breaks existing configuration
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 00:27 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> [and it ends here]
>
> The report got truncated yet again. :-(
Missed the fact that it was getting truncated. Looking into it.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Descr
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Steve Dickson writes:
>
> > I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
> >
> > I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
> > when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
[snip]
> New package OpenGTL
> Graphics Transformation Languages
> New package aseqmm
> C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface
> New package bristol
> Synthesizer emulator
> New package certmonger
> Certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment c
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:50:44AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Wouters seems to be non-repsonsive for socat, there a two bugs open
> with no response within 6 months:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511310
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513720
>
> He has be
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29.11.09 12:58, Paulo Cavalcanti (pro...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I made a clean install of Fedora 12, and pulseaudio seems to be behaving
>> >
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
If you need to run stable software, Fedora is not the right distro for you
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:21 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > C'mon do we really need to make this into a fight? The reason why I
> > didn't implement it is that it would be temporary anyway and thus
> > doesn't worth the work, because it's not just that 10 lines of code
> > on ABRT side, it gets more
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 16:47 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > Just checking if I'm the only one - I can't find a bug report, though
> > I'll probably file one. abrt doesn't seem to work in current Rawhide.
> > The daemon and applet both claim to be run
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:21:02PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Is it maybe easily possible to just add another dummy helper script,
> that by default does not create any Requires/Provides, but is called for
> every RPM, e.g. __extra_provides/requires. Then this could be
> overwritten without disturbi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:07:35AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:13:33PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> >> %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
> >>
> >> The external dependency generator doesn't create the file
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:13:33PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>> %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
>>
>> The external dependency generator doesn't create the file "coloring" that
>> the multilib magic needs to operate. So you'll get conflicts
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>>
>>> How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
>>> way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the deve
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan moodbar
I'll take this one. Amarok should be getting support for it again soon.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary
and those who don't...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>> How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
>> way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the devel branch because it is
>> possible to t
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/28/2010 08:25 AM, David Juran wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp
> >
> > Was gnome-common and gtk-sharp really intended to be orphaned? Removing
> > t
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:19:05AM +0200, David Juran wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> > we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> > feature freeze. A list of
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
> way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the devel branch because it is
> possible to take F-12 branch.
>
jna-posix has been retired rather than s
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:57:25AM +0200, Sergey Rudchenko wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 03:03 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Taking ownership of an orphan on the devel collection will prevent them
> > from being blocked. Remember, it is OK to let software die. Don't view
> > this as a list of things that
Hi,
On 01/28/2010 08:25 AM, David Juran wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp
>
> Was gnome-common and gtk-sharp really intended to be orphaned? Removing
> them seem to break quite a lot (large parts of gnome and e.g. f-spot,
> respectivel
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:48:15PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:44 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > Is there some reason we don't have a iwl5150-firmware package? Or
> > that /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode isn't included in
> > iwl5000-firmware?
> >
> > Just askin
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:44 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Is there some reason we don't have a iwl5150-firmware package? Or
> that /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode isn't included in
> iwl5000-firmware?
>
> Just asking because I was helping someone on #fedora get their Intel
> 5150ABN working,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493799
--- Comment #35 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-01-28 14:45:29
EST ---
OK I renamed it, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan fbset
I would have thought there was a little more call for this these days...
is there an alternative tool?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493799
--- Comment #34 from Piotr Drąg 2010-01-28 14:32:44 EST
---
te_IN should be just 'te'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla
On Thursday 28 January 2010 10:28:07 José Matos wrote:
> I'll take this if no one objects. Meanwhile I have contacted Aurelien to
> know why it has been orphaned.
Done.
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
> On the other hand, CMake would probably be less than helpful for the SML
> parts, which comprise a significant portion of the codebase as far as I can
> see, you'd have to work with add_custom_command which isn't that wonderful.
> (For common languages like C/C++ a
2010/1/28 Jesse Keating :
> Unblocked orphan libvisual
> Unblocked orphan libvisual-plugins
I took over those two
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>> I created install DVDs for myself last Saturday through Tuesday (Jan.23-26).
>>> Yesterday (Jan.27) the installed system broke because hald gets an immediate
>>> Trace/Breakpoint trap.
>>
>> Thats an selinux issue that is fixed in current koji builds.
>
> Fixed in what package? New selinux-poli
I took over avarice and uisp.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:04 -0500, Will Woods wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:40 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > > > How far away do we appear to be from having an installable rawhide? Any
> > > > help needed there?
> > >
> > > I creat
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:40 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > > How far away do we appear to be from having an installable rawhide? Any
> > > help needed there?
> >
> > I created install DVDs for myself last Saturday through Tuesday (Jan.23-
On 01/24/2010 06:18 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:26:10 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Jonathan Dieter
>> wrote:
>>> Is there some reason we don't have a iwl5150-firmware package? Or
>>> that /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode isn't included
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:40 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > How far away do we appear to be from having an installable rawhide? Any
> > help needed there?
>
> I created install DVDs for myself last Saturday through Tuesday (Jan.23-26).
> Yesterday (Jan.27) the installed system broke because hald ge
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 12:00 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
> A friendly reminder that yesterday, January 26, 2010, we reached the
> Feature and Spin submission deadline. Any new features or spins
> submitted after yesterday will be targeted for Fedora 14.
>
> A summary of the Fedora 13 milestones
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:24 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/27/2010 12:51 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Start End Name
> > Tue 26-Jan Tue 26-Jan Feature Submission Deadline
> > Tue 26-Jan Tue 26-Jan Custom Spins Submission Deadline
> > Thu 28-Jan Thu 28-Jan Create Installab
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:14 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Nevertheless, what is the recommended procedure to claim the other
> branches? Is it a ticket to FESCo trac or a CVS Admin procedure
> request?
Honestly that's a good question. I'd start with a FESCo ticket and see
what happens?
--
Jesse Ke
> How far away do we appear to be from having an installable rawhide? Any
> help needed there?
I created install DVDs for myself last Saturday through Tuesday (Jan.23-26).
Yesterday (Jan.27) the installed system broke because hald gets an immediate
Trace/Breakpoint trap.
--
--
devel mailing li
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:18:33PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libxtables.so.4
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libip6tc.so.0
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libip4tc.so.0
> 1:libgues
On 01/27/2010 12:51 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Start End Name
> Tue 26-Jan Tue 26-Jan Feature Submission Deadline
> Tue 26-Jan Tue 26-Jan Custom Spins Submission Deadline
> Thu 28-Jan Thu 28-Jan Create Installable Images for QA testing #2
How far away do we appear to be from ha
Compose started at Thu Jan 28 08:15:09 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires libextractor.so.1
easystroke-0.5.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.5
fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493799
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
There was an outage starting at 2010-01-28 16:40:00 UTC, which is ongoing.
Resolution time is not yet known.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-01-28 16:40:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Bodhi
Buildsystem
CV
Steve Dickson on 01/28/2010 09:44 AM wrote:
> What is CONDSTORE support and will I have to turn it back on
> once the problem has been resolved?
According to the RFC[1], it allows more efficient multi-client access
support to an IMAP server. Disabling CONDSTORE will result in more
bandwidth usag
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Manual/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32571
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Manual.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Jan 28 2010 Chris Weyl 1:5.8003-1
- auto-update to 5.8003 (by cpan-spec-update 0
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Manual:
2fa0615717d14f806c646b2e1c89b9e4 Catalyst-Manual-5.8003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 01/28/2010 10:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Michal Schmidt on 01/28/2010 09:15 AM wrote:
>> This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
>> ~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf which fixed the problem (it
>> made Thunderbird reload the state of the emails fr
Quoting Richard Zidlicky (r...@linux-m68k.org):
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > > All in all I think it's a shame that the original proposal didn't work
> > > out at this time. Having binaries owned by bin:bin does have Unix (but
> > > not Linux AFAIK) trad
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> You (should) get the same effect from right-clicking on a mail folder
> and selecting "Rebuild Index".
s/selecting/selecting properties, then/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Michal Schmidt on 01/28/2010 09:15 AM wrote:
> This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
> ~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf which fixed the problem (it
> made Thunderbird reload the state of the emails from the IMAP server
> again).
You (should) get the same ef
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:38:27PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 03:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> O
Dne 28.1.2010 15:53, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
>>> BEWARE!
>>>
>>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
Everybody take a look at this bug (now CLOSED/UPSTREAM) for temporary
workaround.
Matěj
--
http://www.
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:17:57 -0500 Steve Dickson wrote:
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as
> new) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf whi
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> On 01/27/2010 02:17 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > Do you think moving this is a bad idea?
> Yes.
>
> The pciutils are valuable tools when trying to recover from situations
> when "things go utterly wrong".
So what difference does it make where they are
On 01/28/2010 08:58 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
>> BEWARE!
>>
>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>>
>> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, a
On 01/28/2010 08:29 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
> I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
>
> On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
>> the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
>> or dest
Mike McGrath on 01/28/2010 08:45 AM wrote:
> This one's tricky, what checks could have been in place to prevent this?
> Additional testing may not have worked as some people say they aren't
> seeing the issue.
It (should) be only IMAP users who are affected. Not every TB user is
using IMAP. I see
On 01/28/2010 09:45 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> BEWARE!
>>
>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>>
>> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all ta
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to
On 01/28/2010 03:25 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:17:08PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> U
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493799
--- Comment #32 from Krishna Babu K 2010-01-28 09:17:31
EST ---
Created an attachment (id=387336)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:49:07PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BN" == Bill Nottingham writes:
>
> BN> There is a new internal process that encourages that packages have
> BN> existing Fedora reviews.
>
> Please define "internal". If this is some Red Hat internal thing, don't
> y
On 28 January 2010 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> feature freeze. A list of unblocked orphans and the broken deps they
> would cause is at the end of th
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to ver
Never use it. I don't know :-/
> Nikola,
>
> I've already donne it. I have only one kernel. In /boot I have the files:
>
> $ ls -axlF
> drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 1024 Jan 27 00:04 ./
> drwxr-xr-x. 26 root root 4096 Jan 28 11:17 ../
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 95191 Jan 19 20:58
> config-2.6.30.10-105.
Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
>
> I think it's a bit unfair to assume less than good faith on the part of
> other developers.
Amen... I too use Thunderbird daily (including 3.0.1) and I have not
seen these issues either. Although it does appear that the update
bypassed upd
Nikola,
I've already donne it. I have only one kernel. In /boot I have the files:
$ ls -axlF
drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root1024 Jan 27 00:04 ./
drwxr-xr-x. 26 root root4096 Jan 28 11:17 ../
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 95191 Jan 19 20:58
config-2.6.30.10-105.2.4.fc11.x86_64
drwxr-xr-x. 3 roo
I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
> the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
> or destructive. Then there a small group of people that simpl
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to version 3.0.1!!!
Most of us really take pride in makin
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:45 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 28 January 2010 01:16, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 01:47 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 23:08 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> >> > 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
> >> > > I suspect a lo
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> E17 components are outdated since a whole while and the maintainer
>> doesent even respond:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Rudolf Kastl
>>
>> p.s. put the maintainers bz email on cc
16 days lat
On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Unfortunately it doesn't because of this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >> Unfortunately it doesn't because of this:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386
> >>
> >> Jirka
> >
I have taken cluttermm and clutter-gtkmm.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/27/2010 10:57 PM, nodata wrote:
On 27/01/10 09:29, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/26/2010 10:02 PM, nodata wrote:
Hi,
When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining about this.
Is there any precedent for this? I have bluetooth disabled, but I don't
get a complaint for that..
Filed
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:41:52AM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 28 January 2010 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> > we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> > feature freeze. A list of unblocked
On 28/01/10 10:28, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> about the orphans advertised on devel-announce list:
> I grabbed all the orphan perl modules except for the long-dead
> proprietary-sw-related DDL::Oracler.
>
>> Unblocked orphan perl-AnyEvent-XMPP
>> Unblocked orphan perl-Jemplate
>> Unblocked or
Dne 28.1.2010 03:17, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas napsal(a):
> Nikola Pajkovsky,
>
> I´d like to "have a nice coding" but, excuse me for my limitation. where
> can I find help for this problem:
>
> 1 -> It is installed and working F11-x86_64 and I want to install
> F12-x86_64.
> 2 ->
> problem:https://
On 28 January 2010 01:16, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 01:47 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 23:08 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> > 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
>> > > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
>> > > those k
On 28 January 2010 10:38, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
>> > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
>> > those kinds of tools that "just works" and so people stick with i
On 28 January 2010 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> feature freeze. A list of unblocked orphans and the broken deps they
> would cause is at the end of th
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
> > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
> > those kinds of tools that "just works" and so people stick with it.
>
> Well.. perhaps. OTOH people seem to have happily
Hello,
about the orphans advertised on devel-announce list:
I grabbed all the orphan perl modules except for the long-dead
proprietary-sw-related DDL::Oracler.
> Unblocked orphan perl-AnyEvent-XMPP
> Unblocked orphan perl-Jemplate
> Unblocked orphan perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear
> Unb
On Thursday 28 January 2010 01:03:51 Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan mhonarc
I'll take this if no one objects. Meanwhile I have contacted Aurelien to know
why it has been orphaned.
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > All in all I think it's a shame that the original proposal didn't work
> > out at this time. Having binaries owned by bin:bin does have Unix (but
> > not Linux AFAIK) tradition behind it.
>
> And remounting ro doesn't let a task
Package perl-AnyEvent-XMPP in Fedora devel is now owned by kasal
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedor
Package perl-Jemplate in Fedora devel is now owned by kasal
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Jemplate
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.o
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
