On 01/28/2010 01:02 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:On 01/28/2010 02:03 AM, Neil Horman wrote:On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46:33PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:Unfortunately it doesn't because of this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386JirkaBear in mind, Abrt could have fixed this any time in the past few weeks, they've just chosen not to. Jiri, you and I agreed that you would pursue a user space correction for this that I laid out for you if I proposed a kernel space solution. I can't help but notice you seem to have tossed that asside. NeilYes, I decided not to implement it, because I discussed the proposed solution with few other engineers and nobody likes it and the security/selinux guys wouldn't like it also. Please don't take me wrong, the solution you've proposed is just a few lines of code, so it's not a big problem to write it, but it's just a temporary workaround and would require changing the selinux policy and to make it work fine. We can take a vote and if there is enough people to support it then I' write it, but I don't writing something to /proc/<pid>/ is a good idea. JirkaWell, thanks for comming to a conclusion about this without bothering to bring it back up with me, thats fantastic. The bottom line is, you saw that I was willing to try do what you wanted me to do, and concluded that you didn't need to do what I had asked you to do. Thats a lousy way to behave. Neil
I'm sorry that you feel that way, but what would it change anyway? I already told you my concerns about that on irc, yes I said I'll implement it, but before that I went to discuss it with some of my colleagues and no-one likes it for the same reasons I already told you, so what would be the point of repeating the same if I already knew your opinion?
J.
<<attachment: jmoskovc.vcf>>
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel