On 04/23/19 19:52, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 2019-04-18 17:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>> (1) Introduce stable *branches* to the development model. Those would be
>> forked off at the stable tags (well, at some of them).
>
>
> Would this be _re_ introducing stable branches?
Yes.
> As explained in
LTS version once a year.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yi
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> 发送时间: 2019年4月23日 19:10
> 收件人: liyi 00215672 ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2
>
> On 04/19/19 1
:53
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; ler...@redhat.com; liyi 00215672
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2
On 2019-04-18 17:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> (1) Introduce stable *branches* to the development model. Those would
> be forked off at the stable tags (well, at som
On 2019-04-18 17:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> (1) Introduce stable *branches* to the development model. Those would be
> forked off at the stable tags (well, at some of them).
Would this be _re_ introducing stable branches? As explained in
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UDK
s, I agree we can publish the LTS version once a year.
Thanks!
Yi
-邮件原件-
发件人: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2019年4月23日 19:10
收件人: liyi 00215672 ; devel@edk2.groups.io
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2
On 04/19/19 13:11, liyi 00215672 wrote
On 04/19/19 13:11, liyi 00215672 wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> 1. If we could put some human resources into stable-branch(LTS), so could you
> give us an rough assessment, how many people should we put them into that? :)
Honestly: no idea.
Maybe this could be estimated if all of the commits / BZs sin
Hi Laszlo,
1. If we could put some human resources into stable-branch(LTS), so could you
give us an rough assessment, how many people should we put them into that? :)
2. If we make a stable-branch(LTS) into reality, we can invent some rules,
likes one year(or two years) to release a LTS version
On 04/18/19 09:17, liyi 00215672 wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Backgroud: If we choose one stable-tag as our own UEFI codebase, however
> after 3 years, there are so many new features(but we don't need) will be
> added into EDK2 main tree.
>
> Requestion: Could EDK2 community plan or maintain "LTS version
Hi Guys,
Backgroud: If we choose one stable-tag as our own UEFI codebase, however after
3 years, there are so many new features(but we don't need) will be added into
EDK2 main tree.
Requestion: Could EDK2 community plan or maintain "LTS version" concept like
Linux? On LTS version , we only make
