Hi Laszlo,
Glad to get your detailed advices, it's useful for us.
We can give a label like "New feature" or "Bug fixed" to state the
patch or BZ, then the LTS maintainer can easy to distinguish whether put
them(patch or BZ) into LTS version.
Yes, I agree we can publish the LTS version once a year.
Thanks!
Yi
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2019年4月23日 19:10
收件人: liyi 00215672 <phoenix.l...@huawei.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2
On 04/19/19 13:11, liyi 00215672 wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> 1. If we could put some human resources into stable-branch(LTS), so
> could you give us an rough assessment, how many people should we put
> them into that? :)
Honestly: no idea.
Maybe this could be estimated if all of the commits / BZs since the first
stable tag, edk2-stable201808, were now reviewed in retrospect, as to whether
each would be a candidate for backporting to a stable branch based on
"edk2-stable201808". Alas, right now that means ~1500 commits, so not too easy
either...
Perhaps you could dedicate one person ATM to monitor / investigate this
question. Monitor all of the new BZs and all of the patches posted to
edk2-devel, and try to determine, working with the subject package maintainers,
whether each issue is a bug (= not a new feature) and whether it affects, say,
"edk2-stable201903". If it does, then the patch is likely a backport candidate.
If this person managed to actually backport these patches, let's say to a
personal stable branch for starters, and test them too, then in a few months we
might have evidence that the process works -- and then the central repo could
grow such an official stable branch.
It's difficult to say how much extra time is needed, without researching it
first in practice.
> 2. If we make a stable-branch(LTS) into reality, we can invent some rules,
> likes one year(or two years) to release a LTS version, the LTS version was
> only merged the bug-fixed. After the one or two years ,we will release
> another new LTS version and the older one LTS we would maintain for 3-5
> years.
I'd suggest starting small, and aiming at 1 year (tops) at first, for keeping a
stable branch alive.
Thanks
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#39419): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/39419
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31309500/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
