+tianoc...@kernel.org ;
sunny.w...@arm.com ; samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com
; René Treffer
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx: Tweak PCIe for
CM4
Hi Jeremy,
Is any of this still conceptually necessary if we adopt the SMCCC interface
within UEFI?
Instead of assuming the
...@kernel.org
; sunny.w...@arm.com ;
samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com ; René Treffer
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx: Tweak PCIe for
CM4
Hi Jeremy,
Is any of this still conceptually necessary if we adopt the SMCCC interface
within UEFI?
Instead of assuming the first
; René
Treffer
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx: Tweak PCIe for CM4
The CM4 has an actual pcie slot, so we need to move the linkup
check to the configuration probe logic. Further the device
restriction logic needs to be relaxed to support downstream
PCIe switches.
Suggested
Hi,
On 8/6/21 8:42 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 18:36, Jeremy Linton wrote:
The CM4 has an actual pcie slot, so we need to move the linkup
check to the configuration probe logic. Further the device
restriction logic needs to be relaxed to support downstream
PCIe switches.
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 18:36, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
> The CM4 has an actual pcie slot, so we need to move the linkup
> check to the configuration probe logic. Further the device
> restriction logic needs to be relaxed to support downstream
> PCIe switches.
>
> Suggested-by: René Treffer
> Signed-
The CM4 has an actual pcie slot, so we need to move the linkup
check to the configuration probe logic. Further the device
restriction logic needs to be relaxed to support downstream
PCIe switches.
Suggested-by: René Treffer
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton
---
.../Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor
