Ok, I misunderstood the patch set (I thought the PciHostBridgeLib itself would 
eventually move to DEN0115).

I still think that (in general) would be a good idea - if not for the benefit 
of the Pi, then for the next upstreamed platform where you could avoid 
implementing custom config access code...

Reviewed-by: Andrei Warkentin <awarken...@vmware.com>

--
Andrei Warkentin,
Arm Enablement Architect,
Cloud Platform Business Unit, VMware
________________________________
From: Andrei Warkentin <awarken...@vmware.com>
Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 7:02 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; jeremy.lin...@arm.com 
<jeremy.lin...@arm.com>
Cc: p...@akeo.ie <p...@akeo.ie>; ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org 
<ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; sunny.w...@arm.com <sunny.w...@arm.com>; 
samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com <samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com>; René Treffer 
<treffer+groups...@measite.de>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx: Tweak PCIe for 
CM4

Hi Jeremy,

Is any of this still conceptually necessary if we adopt the SMCCC interface 
within UEFI?

Instead of assuming the first downstream bus is bus 1, could you read the 
secondary BN from the RP?

--
Andrei Warkentin,
Arm Enablement Architect,
Cloud Platform Business Unit, VMware
________________________________
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> on behalf of Jeremy Linton 
via groups.io <jeremy.linton=arm....@groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 7:35 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: p...@akeo.ie <p...@akeo.ie>; ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org 
<ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Andrei Warkentin <awarken...@vmware.com>; 
sunny.w...@arm.com <sunny.w...@arm.com>; samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com 
<samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com>; Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>; René 
Treffer <treffer+groups...@measite.de>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx: Tweak PCIe for CM4

The CM4 has an actual pcie slot, so we need to move the linkup
check to the configuration probe logic. Further the device
restriction logic needs to be relaxed to support downstream
PCIe switches.

Suggested-by: René Treffer <treffer+groups...@measite.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>
---
 .../Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c           |  5 -----
 .../Library/Bcm2711PciSegmentLib/PciSegmentLib.c   | 24 +++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLib/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c
 
b/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLib/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c
index 8587d2d36d..4d4c584726 100644
--- 
a/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLib/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c
+++ 
b/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLib/Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c
@@ -204,11 +204,6 @@ Bcm2711PciHostBridgeLibConstructor (
   } while (((Data & 0x30) != 0x030) && (Timeout));
   DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "PCIe link ready (status=%x) Timeout=%d\n", Data, 
Timeout));

-  if ((Data & 0x30) != 0x30) {
-    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "PCIe link not ready (status=%x)\n", Data));
-    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
-  }
-
   if ((Data & 0x80) != 0x80) {
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "PCIe link not in RC mode (status=%x)\n", Data));
     return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
diff --git 
a/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciSegmentLib/PciSegmentLib.c 
b/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciSegmentLib/PciSegmentLib.c
index 44ce3b4b99..3ccc131eab 100644
--- a/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciSegmentLib/PciSegmentLib.c
+++ b/Silicon/Broadcom/Bcm27xx/Library/Bcm2711PciSegmentLib/PciSegmentLib.c
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ PciSegmentLibGetConfigBase (
   UINT64        Base;
   UINT64        Offset;
   UINT32        Dev;
+  UINT32        Bus;
+  UINT32        Data;

   Base = PCIE_REG_BASE;
   Offset = Address & 0xFFF;         /* Pick off the 4k register offset */
@@ -89,17 +91,25 @@ PciSegmentLibGetConfigBase (
     Base += PCIE_EXT_CFG_DATA;
     if (mPciSegmentLastAccess != Address) {
       Dev = EFI_PCI_ADDR_DEV (Address);
+      Bus = EFI_PCI_ADDR_BUS (Address);
+
       /*
-       * Scan things out directly rather than translating the "bus" to a 
device, etc..
-       * only we need to limit each bus to a single device.
+       * There can only be a single device on bus 1 (downstream of root).
+       * Subsequent busses (behind a PCIe switch) can have more.
        */
-      if (Dev < 1) {
-          MmioWrite32 (PCIE_REG_BASE + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX, Address);
-          mPciSegmentLastAccess = Address;
-      } else {
-          mPciSegmentLastAccess = 0;
+      if (Dev > 0 && (Bus < 2)) {
           return 0xFFFFFFFF;
       }
+
+      /* Don't probe slots if the link is down */
+      Data = MmioRead32 (PCIE_REG_BASE + PCIE_MISC_PCIE_STATUS);
+      if ((Data & 0x30) != 0x30) {
+          DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "PCIe link not ready (status=%x)\n", Data));
+          return 0xFFFFFFFF;
+      }
+
+      MmioWrite32 (PCIE_REG_BASE + PCIE_EXT_CFG_INDEX, Address);
+      mPciSegmentLastAccess = Address;
     }
   }
   return Base + Offset;
--
2.13.7








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#78815): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/78815
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84688700/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to