Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg/BhyveBhfPkg: add support for QemuFwCfg

2022-03-29 Thread Corvin Köhne
Hi Gerd, > Hmm, so QemuFwCfg and BhyveFwCtl are incompatible but use the same > ports? I guess the signature used is different then so the guest > has a chance to figure which one is active? Yes, BhyveFwCtl uses another signature. Best regards Corvin Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG | Manag

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg/BhyveBhfPkg: add support for QemuFwCfg

2022-03-29 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Corvin Köhne wrote: > From: Corvin Köhne > > QemuFwCfg is much more powerful than BhyveFwCtl. Sadly, BhyveFwCtl > decided to use the same IO ports as QemuFwCfg. It's not possible to use > both interfaces simultaneously. So, prefer QemuFwCfg over BhyveFwC

[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg/BhyveBhfPkg: add support for QemuFwCfg

2022-03-28 Thread Corvin Köhne
From: Corvin Köhne QemuFwCfg is much more powerful than BhyveFwCtl. Sadly, BhyveFwCtl decided to use the same IO ports as QemuFwCfg. It's not possible to use both interfaces simultaneously. So, prefer QemuFwCfg over BhyveFwCtl. Signed-off-by: Corvin Köhne CC: Ard Biesheuvel CC: Jiewen Yao CC