On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Corvin Köhne wrote: > From: Corvin Köhne <corv...@beckhoff.com> > > QemuFwCfg is much more powerful than BhyveFwCtl. Sadly, BhyveFwCtl > decided to use the same IO ports as QemuFwCfg. It's not possible to use > both interfaces simultaneously. So, prefer QemuFwCfg over BhyveFwCtl.
Hmm, so QemuFwCfg and BhyveFwCtl are incompatible but use the same ports? I guess the signature used is different then so the guest has a chance to figure which one is active? Assuming the above is correct the patch looks sane. Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#88165): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/88165 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/90103182/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
