答复: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2

2019-04-23 Thread liyi 00215672
:53 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; ler...@redhat.com; liyi 00215672 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2 On 2019-04-18 17:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > (1) Introduce stable *branches* to the development model. Those would > be forked off at the stable tags (well, at som

答复: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2

2019-04-23 Thread liyi 00215672
s, I agree we can publish the LTS version once a year. Thanks! Yi -邮件原件- 发件人: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] 发送时间: 2019年4月23日 19:10 收件人: liyi 00215672 ; devel@edk2.groups.io 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2 On 04/19/19 13:11, liyi 00215672 wrote

Re: [edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2

2019-04-19 Thread liyi 00215672
Hi Laszlo, 1. If we could put some human resources into stable-branch(LTS), so could you give us an rough assessment, how many people should we put them into that? :) 2. If we make a stable-branch(LTS) into reality, we can invent some rules, likes one year(or two years) to release a LTS version

[edk2-devel] Requestion for LTS version on EDK2

2019-04-18 Thread liyi 00215672
Hi Guys, Backgroud: If we choose one stable-tag as our own UEFI codebase, however after 3 years, there are so many new features(but we don't need) will be added into EDK2 main tree. Requestion: Could EDK2 community plan or maintain "LTS version" concept like Linux? On LTS version , we only make