On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:05 PM Nathan Froyd wrote:
> One grotty low-level question about the new exception proposal. Your
> post states:
>
> "it was observed that since we need to revise the calling convention
> as part of this proposal anyways, perhaps we could take the
> opportunity to make ot
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> I would never have guessed that any committee would have thought the failure
> of the graphics API proposal was that it didn't go far enough.
I think of web_view as a change of direction compared to the graphics
API proposal, rather than goin
This document lives at (viewable publicly, but not editable except for
specific people):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TdDbjYFpFq4TH06vh-e-P8qoLcQ8SpNMIudKr3x-7ho/edit
I'm happy to respond to comments here, and if there are significant
changes I'll add them to the doc and comment here. I ha
(sorry for top posting)
Dear Jan and Steve,
Problems solved.
After a few trials and errors, I figured there are TWO similar
constructs that, depending on the order of parameter evaluation, may
not pass what is desired due to unexpected modification during
parameter evaluation.
I changed my loc
4 matches
Mail list logo
