Hi,
What is the version of clang used on tryserver?
The local clang-8 I have on my linux PC crashes due to internal compiler
error during optimization pass, and I want to know what version is used
on tryserver.
I have been using GCC for compiling TB locally and intend to do so just
because
On 30 Jul 2019 13:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
What is the version of clang used on tryserver?
The same as on the local machine? For Windows I get:
$ ../.mozbuild/clang/bin/clang --version
clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final 356365)
Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
Thread model: posix
In
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki
wrote:
>nsresult rv2
> = NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream),
> mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(), <=== It seems this can be nullptr in
> clang-8 version???
> 64 * 1024 );
>
On 7/30/19 6:20 AM, Jan de Mooij wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki
wrote:
nsresult rv2
= NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream),
mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(), <=== It seems this can be nullptr in
clang-8 version???
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote:
> If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last
> week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on
> Planet):
>
> https://botondballo.wordpress.com/2019/07/26/trip-report-c-standards-meeting-in-cologne-july-
On 2019/07/30 21:13, Jörg Knobloch wrote:
On 30 Jul 2019 13:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
What is the version of clang used on tryserver?
The same as on the local machine? For Windows I get:
$ ../.mozbuild/clang/bin/clang --version
clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final 356365)
Target: x8
Dear Jan,
I am glad that I included the snippet of code here.
I should have known.
I would try to work around this, well I would try, and see if I can
avoid the
runtime error on tryserver (!).
Thanks a million!
Chiaki
On 2019/07/30 22:20, Jan de Mooij wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 P
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:04:56PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote:
> > If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last
> > week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on
> > Planet):
> >
> > https://botondballo
Dear Steve,
Thank you for your analysis and suggestion for moving to gcc-8.
I would change my local GCC compiler to gcc-8, and g++-8.
Also, I would modify the offending code so that
the evaluation order of the arguments does not get in the way.
I still yet to do a few more tasks, but I think t
I want to underline how insane this is:
"...the groups which looked at [the web_view] proposal [...] largely viewed
it favourably, a promising way of allow C++ applications to do things like
graphical output without having to standardize a graphics API ourselves, as
previously attempted."
I feel l
The W3C is proposing a new charter for:
Privacy Interest Group (PING)
https://w3cping.github.io/administrivia/charter-draft.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Jun/0009.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Sunday, August 4. (Sorr
On 7/30/2019 4:40 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:04:56PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:42 PM Botond Ballo wrote:
If you're interested in some more details about what happened at last
week's meeting, my blog post about it is now available (also on
Plane
12 matches
Mail list logo
