Re: Excessive inbound bustage

Mike Hommey wrote: the biggest number of changesets pushed by someone without a backout in the last 25271 changesets is 126. But what's their Try usage like? -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.m

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 11:47:14 PM UTC-4, voracity wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is there an equivalent of: > > python -m SimpleHTTPServer > > in the TLS world currently, or is any progress being made towards that? openssl req -new -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout key.pem -out cert.pem o

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 1:03:00 AM UTC-4, butrus...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:57:58 PM UTC+2, Richard Barnes wrote: > > There's pretty broad agreement that HTTPS is the way forward for the web. > > In recent months, there have been statements from IETF [1], IAB [2], W3C

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss detailed topics in a small real-time setting. If there are community members who are well-prepared for this discussion, I don't see why they couldn't be participants. There's no pra

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: > On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss >> detailed topics in a small real-time setting. If there are community >> members who are well-prepared for this discussion,

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

On 2015-04-24 10:14 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mike Hoye > wrote: On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss detailed topics in a small real-time s

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

On 2015-04-24 1:02 AM, butrus.but...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is very very bad idea. There are many resources which are not worth being protected by HTTPS. This is about protecting people, not resources. I think an eight-year-old article about a hacked-up, homebrew 8-bit webserver is the

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: > On 2015-04-24 10:14 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: > >> On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> >>> Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss >>> detailed topi

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

On 24/04/2015 04:02, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:33 PM, wrote: >> Do you have suggestions on where each of the 4 topics I posted >> should be discussed? > > In a meeting, where a small number of participants are > well-prepared. [qoute]We were asked to involve the dev.pla

Re: Tiles Design Questions (was Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles)

I think this discussion has moved a bit off topic. Let's all assume that if the intent was to gather public feedback by a post in the newsgroup that a similar intent of having a meeting with interested participant would include a good sampling of people with interest, and that their employment sta

May I execute mozIStorageStatement.executeAsync() at the same time in a single thread?

I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in parallel, and it's crashed, I am not so sure if multiple executeAsync can be executed at the same time. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev

Re: May I execute mozIStorageStatement.executeAsync() at the same time in a single thread?

On 04/24/2015 12:48 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in parallel, and it's crashed, I am not so sure if multiple executeAsync can be executed at the same time. This is fine. The executeAsy

Enabling Pointer Events in Firefox (desktop) Nightly

tl;dr: We plan to enable Pointer Events for mouse and pen input in Firefox Nightly builds within the next few weeks. Background: Pointer Events is a W3C recommendation that defines new DOM events for unified handling of mouse, touch, and pen input. It also defines a new 'touch-action' CSS pr

Retiring the monolithic test package

This message is about bug 917999 - "Split test package into per-suite packages", more can be found there. I'm working on a set of patches to do this, but the assumption that a build comes with a "tests.zip" that has all of the tests to run against that build seems likely to be a part of more tools

Re: May I execute mozIStorageStatement.executeAsync() at the same time in a single thread?

By the way, I don't know if you're writing JS code or C++ code, but if it's the former, you really should use Sqlite.jsm. Cheers, David On 24/04/15 18:48, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation > in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in

(mozci) Triggering jobs on treeherder

Hello all, We wrote last quarter a project called Mozilla CI tools (mozci) which allows triggering jobs on treeherder. [1] This is specially useful for back-filling jobs (specially when coalesced) and bisecting via job triggering. Specifically, I want to bring to your attention a use case to

Re: (mozci) Triggering jobs on treeherder

Are you going to build a web UI for this so I don't need to check out a repo and run a python script with syntax that I'll likely need to look up every time I want to do it, guessing builder names that I don't know? (don't get me wrong, I could probably use it if I needed to, but it's harder t

Re: (mozci) Triggering jobs on treeherder

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:26:58PM +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > Are you going to build a web UI for this so I don't need to check out a repo > and run a python script with syntax that I'll likely need to look up every > time I want to do it, guessing builder names that I don't know? > > (don't

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:56:21 PM UTC+2, Gervase Markham wrote: > Very briefly: > > On 21/04/15 12:43, Roger Hågensen wrote: > > 1. User downloads a browser (be it Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc.) > > securely (https?) from the official download location. 2. Upon > > installation a private key

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:56:31 PM UTC+2, Mike Hoye wrote: > On 2015-04-21 6:43 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote: > > I know, not that well explained and over simplified. But the concept > > is hopefully clear, but in case it's not... > For what it's worth, a lot of really smart people have been thi

Re: May I execute mozIStorageStatement.executeAsync() at the same time in a single thread?

在 2015年4月25日星期六 UTC+8上午3:28:02，David Rajchenbach-Teller写道： > By the way, I don't know if you're writing JS code or C++ code, but if > it's the former, you really should use Sqlite.jsm. Yes, I was using Javascript code, maybe that's was the cause of failure. > > Cheers, > David > > On 24/04/15 18

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

This is a digression, but it touches on an important question that others are asking in response to this general push [1]. Fundamentally, better client authentication doesn't do anything to help make the web a more secure place (in any of the dimensions that we're primarily concerned about in this