Re: Cairo being considered as the basis of a standard C++ drawing API

2014-02-11 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Botond Ballo wrote: > I think at least one of the goals of the standard drawing API is to > make C++ easier to learn by allowing people learning the language > to create simple graphical applications without having to set up > third-party libraries or learn a comp

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Neil
Edwin Flores wrote: the "click here to view all search results" link I wondered what this was, but it turns out I had disabled JavaScript in that browser. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozi

Re: We should drop MathML

2014-02-11 Thread Dāvis Mosāns
What? Drop MathML? :| Is this some troll... it can't be serious. This is the most stupidest, retarded idea I've heard. MathML works perfectly, it's been W3C standard for ages. Dropping it would be like dropping CSS. Think about the Web... By the way I love XHTML :) XHTML+CSS+JS+SVG+MathML => h

Re: We should drop MathML

2014-02-11 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2/11/2014, 10:19 AM, Dāvis Mosāns wrote: What? Drop MathML? While you're not doing much to endear anyone to your position here, my understanding is that we're not dropping MathML and we'll still take patches from people who'd like to improve it. - mhoye ___

Re: Removing support for OS/2

2014-02-11 Thread Dmitriy Kuminov
11 февр. 2014 г., в 0:01, Ehsan Akhgari написал(а): > OK, that works for me. FWIW any time that you guys decide to revive this > code in your own private branch, you can simply revert the patch to bug > 969757 and merge it against the trunk, and start working on the port with > that baseline.

Re: Removing support for OS/2

2014-02-11 Thread Dmitriy Kuminov
Hello Ehsan, 10 февр. 2014 г., в 20:19, Ehsan Akhgari написал(а): > Can you please point us to where this work is happening? I'm only aware of > this repository: This is the right place. > Do you plan to move your development to trunk in the near

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Erik Rose
> Why are you double spacing the output and then "fixing" it by hard-coding .7 > line spacing for the source and 1.4 for the line numbers? That was weird. Nobody knew why. Fixed now: https://github.com/mozilla/dxr/commit/16784204ce30c428cc3e325d7f5ccd225346bfdf. This also makes copying and past

W3C Proposed Recommendations: WAI-ARIA (accessibility)

2014-02-11 Thread L. David Baron
W3C recently published the following proposed recommendations (the stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation): Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PR-wai-aria-20140206/ WAI-ARIA 1.0 User Agent Implementation Guide http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/P

W3C Proposed Recommendations: MathML 3.0 and XML Entity Definitions for Characters

2014-02-11 Thread L. David Baron
ition http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-MathML3-20140211/ XML Entity Definitions for Characters (2nd Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-xml-entity-names-20140211/ There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla is one) open until March 11. If there are comments you thi

Proposed W3C Charter: HTML5 Chinese Interest Group

2014-02-11 Thread L. David Baron
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML5 Chinese Interest Group. For more details, see: http://www.w3.org/2013/12/html-ig-zh-charter.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jan/0007.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through February 24.

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Reed Loden
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:26:19 -0500 Erik Rose wrote: > https://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2014/02/07/dxr-gets-a-huge-ui-refresh/ > > Happy hacking! I do like the slickness and quickness, but it still seems greatly-lacking usability-wise (as compared to mxr)... A few things off the top of my head: *

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Reed Loden wrote: > I do like the slickness and quickness, but it still seems > greatly-lacking usability-wise (as compared to mxr)... > > A few things off the top of my head: > * Where are the non-mozilla-central repositories? > * Where's the integration with CVS

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Erik Rose
Hi, Reed. Rest assured, many of your wishes are planned for the future. But when you have a big project, you've got to pick some things. Last week's release was an important milestone: it was the minimal feature set that would yield a cohesive experience under a UI new design. The new design so

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML5 Chinese Interest Group

2014-02-11 Thread Kyle Huey
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML5 Chinese Interest > Group. For more details, see: > http://www.w3.org/2013/12/html-ig-zh-charter.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jan/0007.html > > Mozilla has th

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Erik Rose
> that's pretty, but where did the list of classes & class members go when > viewing files like > http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/modules/libjar/nsZipArchive.cpp I believe this is fixed now, a casualty of a needless use of JS, which is now gone. If you still see this behavior, ple

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2/11/2014, 3:18 PM, Reed Loden wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:26:19 -0500 Erik Rose wrote: https://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2014/02/07/dxr-gets-a-huge-ui-refresh/ Happy hacking! I do like the slickness and quickness, but it still seems greatly-lacking usability-wise (as compared to mxr)...

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Taras Glek
Very happy now :) Erik Rose Tuesday, February 11, 2014 14:50 I believe this is fixed now, a casualty of a needless use of JS, which is now gone. If you still see this behavior, please reopen https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965659. Thanks for riding out

Re: DXR UI refresh is live!

2014-02-11 Thread Joshua Cranmer 🐧
On 2/11/2014 5:00 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I don't think any of these are important features for us to focus on. I would say that we accept patches for the last three items, but I don't think we are interested in accepting patches for CVS support into DXR. This statement is worth slightly

Retiring Bugzilla components?

2014-02-11 Thread Chris Peterson
What is the process for retiring obsolete Bugzilla components to the Graveyard? During a bug triage, I stumbled upon some old components that can probably be moved out of the Core product (or simply RESOLVED WONTFIX or INVALID): • Core:: Nanojit (from Adobe collaboration on Tamarin VM) • Core:

Re: Retiring Bugzilla components?

2014-02-11 Thread Kevin Brosnan
File a bugzila.mozilla.org bug. Administration component. Cc'ing any module owners or peers that are involved in the project. If it seems useful to announce it, here or a more specific mailing list makes sense. Kevin On Feb 11, 2014 3:45 PM, "Chris Peterson" wrote: > What is the process for reti

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML5 Chinese Interest Group

2014-02-11 Thread 陳侃如
Kyle Huey writes: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, L. David Baron wrote: >> W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML5 Chinese Interest >> Group. For more details, see: >> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/html-ig-zh-charter.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jan/00

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML5 Chinese Interest Group

2014-02-11 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2014-02-12 11:16 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote: > Kyle Huey writes: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML5 Chinese Interest > >> Group. For more details, see: > >> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/html-ig-zh-charter