Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2019-04-29 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a new charter for: HTML Working Group https://www.w3.org/2018/12/html.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through this Friday, May 3. There's a bit of background to this

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-05-22 Thread Mounir Lamouri
On 22/05/13 03:09, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: >> W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. >> For more details, see: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charte

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-05-21 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: > W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. > For more details, see: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ > > Mozilla has the opportunity to sen

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Neil
Gervase Markham wrote: I'm not enamoured of the idea of the answer to "how do I watch Netflix/LoveFilm in Firefox?" being "head over to Microsoft and install Silverlight; bad luck if you run anything other than Windows or Mac OS X". (AFAICT, that is the answer at the moment anyway, but at lea

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 13/02/13 12:55, Henri Sivonen wrote: > I don't think we have this option. Microsoft and Google have editors > on the EME spec. So this option looks more like: Have Hollywood movies > available with good performance and without additional installs in IE > and Chrome and *for the time being* avail

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Henri Sivonen
For starters, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0178.html . On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: > A) Provide a DRM mechanism in HTML5 which keeps them happy. (How > breakable or not it actually is, is a different question.) Have the > video deli

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/02/13 21:20, Benoit Jacob wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly with Benjamin and care about this, but I don't have > a lot of time to get into this presumably time-consuming discussion on a > W3C mailing list --- so I'd just like to express support to any Mozilla > representative fighting this fig

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/02/13 21:20, Benoit Jacob wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly with Benjamin and care about this, but I don't have > a lot of time to get into this presumably time-consuming discussion on a > W3C mailing list --- so I'd just like to express support to any Mozilla > representative fighting this fig

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread Benoit Jacob
2013/2/12 Robert O'Callahan > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Benjamin Smedberg >wrote: > > > The only really interesting thing in the new charter seems to be the > > explicit call for standardizing "playback of protected content" for the > > HTMLMediaElement, which is pretty much codewords for

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > The only really interesting thing in the new charter seems to be the > explicit call for standardizing "playback of protected content" for the > HTMLMediaElement, which is pretty much codewords for DRM. > > DRM is fundamentally at odds wi

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread sdaugherty
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:02:16 AM UTC-5, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > > W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. > > > For more details, see: > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html >

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objection

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-09 Thread L. David Baron
On Saturday 2013-02-09 17:15 -0800, Justin Dolske wrote: > On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. > >For more details, see: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html > >http://www.w3.org/html/wg/chart

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-09 Thread Justin Dolske
On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Is there a way to see what's changing from the current cha

Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-08 Thread L. David Baron
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Tuesday, March 12. Please reply to