On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:10 PM Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/16/20 11:21 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> > Would it be appropriate to state that we don't intend to implement
> > the Audio Device Client API in Gecko because we don't see a need
> > for this additional/parallel audio API?
>
> Does anyone
On 1/16/20 11:21 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Would it be appropriate to state that we don't intend to implement
the Audio Device Client API in Gecko because we don't see a need
for this additional/parallel audio API?
Does anyone other than Google want the Audio Device Client API?
* Something th
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Audio Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2019-ac.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Dec/0012.html
The differences from the previous charter are:
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2F
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:25 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 2016-10-21 15:01 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Support revised charter, with requested changes:
>> * Hyperlink the phrase "Community Group" in the charter to the
>> specific Community Group they mean, and perhaps title the hyperlin
On Friday 2016-10-21 15:01 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> Support revised charter, with requested changes:
> * Hyperlink the phrase "Community Group" in the charter to the
> specific Community Group they mean, and perhaps title the hyperlink
> more specifically as well.
> * List the Community Group e
We should support this new charter.
We've been commenting, specifying and implementing both specs of this
Working Group (Although we've not shipped Web MIDI at the moment), and
we're participating very actively in the development of those standards
(V1.0 and V2.0 for Web Audio API, lighter involv
I have reviewed the revised charter and list of deliverables. The
work appears to be proceeding reasonably (pragmatically, with many
members/implementers including Apple, Google, and Microsoft) and reasonably
scoped. There is mention of a Community Group, but no link to a CG in
particular. Perhaps
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Audio Working Group
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Oct/.html
https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2016.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Monday, October 31. However, I hop
On Wednesday 2012-08-01 16:21 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Audio Working Group. For
> more details, see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Jul/0011.html
> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/2012/charter-proposed.html
>
> Mozil
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Audio Working Group. For
more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Jul/0011.html
http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/2012/charter-proposed.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
the end o
10 matches
Mail list logo
