On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:25 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2016-10-21 15:01 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> Support revised charter, with requested changes: >> * Hyperlink the phrase "Community Group" in the charter to the >> specific Community Group they mean, and perhaps title the hyperlink >> more specifically as well. >> * List the Community Group explicitly in the coordination section >> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2016.html#coordination and >> describe the relationship between the WG and the CG. > > So the only community group mention I can see in the charter is to > say that work that is out of scope for the working group could > instead occur in a community group (which I think means a > hypothetical community group). If that's the case, I don't think > the second comment makes sense since the intent is that the material > be out of scope for the working group. It could be clearer that the > community group is hypothetical, though. > > I'm inclined to submit the comment as: >> One basically-editorial suggestion: >> >> Either: >> >> * Hyperlink the phrase "Community Group" in the charter to the >> specific Community Group intended, and perhaps title the hyperlink >> more specifically as well. >> >> * Or, if no such community group exists, make it clearer that it's >> a hypothetical community group. > > (and record it as a support-with-optional-changes).
Yes, support with optional-changes, and how you've worded it works for me. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
