Re: HTMLOverlays (was Re: Moratorium on new XUL features)

2014-10-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-10-16, 1:44 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: On 16/10/14 12:54, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: It can be implemented in JS, right? Indeed. I meant, as a JS library by web developers who feel like it's needed, not by us. :-) FWIW I think that XUL overlays are a terrible way of extending

Re: HTMLOverlays (was Re: Moratorium on new XUL features)

2014-10-16 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
On 16/10/14 12:54, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > It can be implemented in JS, right? Indeed. -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.m

Re: HTMLOverlays (was Re: Moratorium on new XUL features)

2014-10-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-10-16, 7:02 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: Which actually looks pretty good to me and should perhaps be (re)discussed. It can be implemented in JS, right? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla

HTMLOverlays (was Re: Moratorium on new XUL features)

2014-10-16 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
Which actually looks pretty good to me and should perhaps be (re)discussed. I wonder if something like HTMLoverlays (certainly extended with a mechanism to help with unloading) could be made part of the Add-on SDK. Cheers, David On 16/10/14 04:53, Gervase Markham wrote: > Although glazou did p