On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Andrew, can you do a pass over the bugs since Jan 1st and, and let's
> rename this FFx::Add Ons Compatablity so that it's clear it's not plugins.
>
Extensions and plugins are both types of add-ons so renaming makes it
less clear as it the
It's fine to keep it as-is for now, but I think the goal should be to get
rid of it (and possibly Tech Evangelism :: Addons too) for the same reasons
as Benjamin noted in his first email.
Seem like most of this component's original intent (naming aside) is
covered by those new components. Compatib
Will Firefox :: Extension Compatibility also be rolled into this new ::
Other component?
(There are ~700 open bugs there still, most of which look pretty stale.)
Justin
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> There used to be a bugzilla.mozilla.org product called "Plugins".
I agree, let's just leave its name as it is for now.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Matthew N.
wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
>>
>> Andrew, can you do a pass over the bugs since Jan 1st and, and let's
>> rename this FFx::Add Ons Compatablity so that it's clear it
Andrew, can you do a pass over the bugs since Jan 1st and, and let's rename
this FFx::Add Ons Compatablity so that it's clear it's not plugins.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Andrew McKay wrote:
> Looks like that would fall on me. After a quick look at some of the
> bugs, its seems like its a h
MattN mentioned there's also a "Tech Evangelism :: Addons" which is for
bugs from add-ons where we aren't going to change anything in the product
but we may contact the author or blog about the addon-compatablty change. I
need to see how busy that one is (I would imagine that it it's being used
for
Looks like that would fall on me. After a quick look at some of the
bugs, its seems like its a holding pen for bugs that need to be passed
on to other areas or back to the add-on developer themselves (which
often means closing them).
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Pasting
Pasting what I mentioned in #fx-team
Regarding FFx::Extension Compatibility componen
t.
702 bugs total, 282 of which are not marked against a particular version
. There are
11 in FFx 44, 10 in FFx 45, 9 in FFx 46, 7 in FFx 47, 3 in FFx 48
,
1 tracking FFx 47
,
and only 44 bugs since
As I understand it, Firefox: Extension Compatibility was a component where
we made Firefox product changes to support extension compat. But it's true
that most of the things that get filed there are "extension X broke in
Firefox version N". I expect WebExtensions to make this better, but in the
me
Let me take a look at those.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
> Will Firefox :: Extension Compatibility also be rolled into this new ::
> Other component?
>
> (There are ~700 open bugs there still, most of which look pretty stale.)
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:53
There used to be a bugzilla.mozilla.org product called "Plugins". This
product has been renamed "External Software Affecting Firefox" and its
component structure has been greatly simplified.
It is usually not helpful to track defects in 3rd-party software in the
Mozilla bug tracker. The only time
11 matches
Mail list logo
