On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:35 AM devsnek
wrote:
> If this is how you feel, encourage Google to fix the problem. This isn't
> Firefox's fault, Firefox is doing the right thing by supporting
> standardized APIs instead of "whatever Google uses". It's incredibly
> frustrating and demoralizing to see
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Steve Fink wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 04:27 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
>>
>>> I actually have a patch sitting around with helpers to make it super
>>> easy to
>>> use smart pointers as tagged pointers :) I
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Would it be easier to answer the opposite question? What should
> not run in a shared process? JS is a given. Others?
>
Currently when an exploitable bug is found in content process code,
attackers use JS to weaponize it with an arsena
Thank you very very much for making this information public again!
Rob
--
Su ot deraeppa sah dna Rehtaf eht htiw saw hcihw, efil lanrete eht uoy ot
mialcorp ew dna, ti ot yfitset dna ti nees evah ew; deraeppa efil eht. Efil
fo Drow eht gninrecnoc mialcorp ew siht - dehcuot evah sdnah ruo dna ta
d
I read the threads you referenced and the latest spec, and I think you're
absolutely right about everything :-).
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Thank you for taking a look, Boris. I'm quite unclear how any of
> the changes proposed in the [[March F2F resolution]] comme
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> It seems that Chrome works around this by choosing to garbage
> collect input nodes even when their presence is specified to
> require (observable) AudioWorkletProcessor.process() calls.
> This garbage collection is performed in a way that c
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> I understand that the goal is better privacy. But it's likely that
> people get outraged if a browser sends information about what is
> browser to an off-path destination without explicit consent regardless
> of intention, nightliness or pro
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> I was just measuring the methods themselves via |nm --print-size|. There
> might be additional per-method overhead in the data segment for the
> associated static tables, but the baseline size for the code itself
> (argument conversion, error
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> Many programming languages paper over these subtle differences leading to
> badness. For example, the preferred path APIs for Python and Rust assume
> paths are Unicode (they have their own logic to perform encoding/decoding
> behind the scen
I thought there was also a legitimate use-case for displaying content "life
size", e.g. if you wanted to draw a ruler on a tablet.
But if the CSSWG doesn't agree after all this time, just drop it I guess.
(Though I think there's something slightly broken about how Web developer
needs are bubbling
Now that I'm writing a Web app for real, I realize just how easy it is to
accidentally leak :-(.
It would be useful, or at least cool, to be able to show users and
developers a graph of memory usage over time, one line per tab. You could
limit this to just show the top N memory-hungry tabs.
A UI
BTW can someone forward this entire thread to their friends at AMD so AMD
will fix their CPUs to run rr? They're tantalizingly close :-/.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseo
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> And the downsides don't even end there. rr didn't work. Plus other
> stuff not worth mentioning here.
>
Turns out that rr not working with Nvidia on Ubuntu 17.10 was actually an
rr issue triggered by the Ubuntu libc upgrade, not Nvidia's fa
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Andrew Halberstadt <
ahalberst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I don't think so, that data already exists and is query-able from
> ActiveData:
> https://activedata.allizom.org/tools/query.html#query_id=8pDOpeni
That query tells you about disabled tests, but doesn't kno
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> Is it worthwhile to define and use a richer test manifest "schema" that
> will facilitate querying and building dashboards so we have better
> visibility into disabled tests?
>
It would be great if there was a way to run all tests that were
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> rr works just fine with multiple processes. Once you have a recording
> you can use `rr ps` to show all the process that were recorded and `rr
> replay -p ` to attach to a particular process. You can combine -p
> with -g as Cameron mention
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Something as simple as "debug something that happens during pageload" is
> currently fairly rocket science to do in e10s mode; doubly so in
> e10s-multi. I haven't seen any concrete proposals for improving this
rr makes it fairly easy on
Experience from Web content standards probably informs the situation here...
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Swan wrote:
> For handling cross-platform versus Firefox-specific APIs, I don't think the
> right outcome is perfectly clear. Of course we should learn from how
> web-exposed AP
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:07 AM, wrote:
> I think that such an API could be spec'd such that it is portable, with
> the output being flexible enough that we can put Mozilla-specific
> information in there. E.g.: A fixed API to get the data, and a minimal
> structure for the output, but say, each
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
> Good choice from Ubuntu. In the meantime, I have run PA->aloop->JACK. Now I
> am back with aloop->JACK. PA is removed from the system (and hopefully, I
> will never need it again). I turned on telemetry for now, but will turn it
> off when #1345661 has
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
>
>> I'm interested to find out how the new Ryzen chips do. It should fit
>> their niche well. I have one at home now, so I'll test when I get a
>> chance.
>>
>
> Ryzen currently on Linux
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:25 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Using clang-format on the entire tree has the massive value of:
>
> * reviewers not needing to point out whitespace and indentation issues
>
> * reduced friction for new contributors (being able to use a tool
>instead of repeatedly it
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Sebastian Zartner <
sebastianzart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740910
My comments in that bug still apply. Ellipsizing in the centre when the
line contains more than just a single text node is really hard.
Rob
--
lbir ye,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> My point was more about whether there's something useful that can be
> done with partially downloaded files other than media files. Not all
> file formats lend themselves to be used before the full file is
> available. I don't know how pr
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Andrew Sutherland <
asutherl...@asutherland.org> wrote:
> A motivating use-case is for a site that wants to download movies/podcasts
> in the background and keep them around for offline purposes. Once the file
> is downloaded, it seems clear that the (ServiceWorker
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Steve Fink wrote:
> I know it's kind of crazy given our garbage-collected, single content
> process world, but reading this thread makes me wonder what it would take
> to use the browser to implement a real linux-hosted audio workstation-type
> app. As in, somethi
In theory responses 301 and 308 mean "permanent redirect" so the browser
could do that for those responses.
In practice you'd need a lot of data to convince yourself that Web
developers haven't screwed this up too badly. Maybe 308, being newer, is
not compromised...
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoe
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> I'm confused. How are keywords not permissionless?
He meant that adding a new keyword requires permission.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr
Last night I landed some changes to improve chaos mode:
http://robert.ocallahan.org/2016/02/deeper-into-chaos.html
It should be significantly improved. Bugs found in chaos mode before might
take longer to reproduce now, but should still be reproducible. Some bugs
it couldn't find before are now re
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> On 15/02/2016 05:16, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> At this point the limiting factor is getting developers to actually debug
>> and fix recorded test failures.
>>
>
> Well, and platform (OS) support
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Relatedly, roc, is it possible to replay, on a different host, with
> possibly a different CPU, a record that would have been taken on the
> cloud? Does using a VM make it possible? If yes, having "the cloud" (or
> a set of developers) try to
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>
> FWIW, every failure that I've debugged to completion so far has been a bug
> in the test (although I have two fatal assertion bugs I'm working through
> that will obviously be flaws in Gecko). I think one of the things we
> really want to get
Over the last few days we have had a lot of positive experiences
reproducing bugs with rr chaos mode. Kyle tells me that, in fact, he's been
able to reproduce every single bug he tried with enough machine time thrown
at it.
At this point the limiting factor is getting developers to actually debug
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
>> nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 02/10/2016 08:04 PM,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 08:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> Background:
>> http://robert.ocallahan.org/2016/02/introducing-rr-chaos-mode.html
>>
>> I just landed on
rr should work fine with c-c xpcshell tests (and most other Linux programs).
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> BenWa tried doing some work on this but kept getting hung up
> on hitting test failures unrelated to the ones we see in production,
possibly due to environment issues.
>
Yes. In this vein, it's possible that in some cases rr chaos mode mi
Background:
http://robert.ocallahan.org/2016/02/introducing-rr-chaos-mode.html
I just landed on rr master support for a "-h" option which enables a chaos
mode for rr recording. This is designed to help reproduce intermittent test
failures under rr. We already have a few reports of people using thi
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
wrote:
> Console, debugger, performance: these panels are a clear "always show" to
> me. The web audio tool is very niche and so I don't think it would make
> sense to show it by default. The memory tool falls in between in my mind.
> I'm open to
Sounds good to me too. What's blocking us from enabling by default?
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm o
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> What are the implications of this?
>
> The web-platform tests are pass/fail, right? So is it a bug if they pass
> but have different behaviors in e10s and non-e10s mode?
>
Yeah, I'm confused.
If a wpt test passes but with different out
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> I think rather we should aim to provide a way for the application to
> implement custom remapping of events. A simple version of this is
> allowing the app to synthesize enough of the inputs to virtually use
> our existing UI. I think this is
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Luke Wagner wrote:
> > FWIW, I was wondering if we could go a step further and allow
> > (optional) user interaction with the rendered DOM elements. That way
> > you could, say, select text on a 3d surface wi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
> There are two use cases for this functionality needed by the WebVR team.
>
> The one needed earliest is to implement HUD interfaces and dialogues. In
> this case, we will only be using this API from chrome privileged code.
> jgilbert has started on a mech
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> At least enforcing CORS-same-origin would be somewhat trivial from a
> specification perspective since all fetches go through Fetch. Limiting
> plugins and other affected features would be some added conditionals
> here and there. I don't
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> > That's an option, but it's a very large problem that's very difficult to
> > get right. And there are so many things that need to be
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert wrote:
> If it is not feasible to prevent variation in timing or to otherwise
> prevent content from determining the content of the texture, perhaps
> another approach would be to require all elements to be sanitized before
> capturing their
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> Yeah, we have a public mailing list: public_we...@khronos.org
> As with anything WebGL related, you can also just talk to me about it.
>
I don't want to step on whatever you were thinking of changing, but I'm
happy to go to the list if you pr
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> > Essentially, we would extend the same API but allow the WDTStream
> >> interface to apply to more HTML elements, not just HTMLCanvasElement,
> >> HTMLImageElement, or HTMLVideoElement.
> >>
> >> We would also need to implement WEBGL_security
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> A big problem is sticking HTML/CSS content into WebGL is that WebGL
> effectively enables reading pixel data through custom shaders and
> timing attacks.
>
If you read
https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/extensions/WEBGL_security_sensitiv
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> I think that it would be most efficient just to have a meeting about
> these topics, instead of iterating slower via email.
>
FWIW I feel like it's more efficient to use email, especially if not all
issues can be resolved in a single meeting
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Kearwood "Kip" Gilbert <
kgilb...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> In WebVR, we often present UI as a Head's Up Display (HUD) that floats
> in front of the user. Additionally, we often wish to show 2d graphics,
> video, and CSS animations as a texture in 3d scenes. Creating
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> This is certainly something one could consider, but it it seems like it
> confers a major
> advantage on the vendor vis-a-vis everyone else. If we're going to have an
> add-on
> mechanism, I don't see why vendors can't use it too.
>
I thin
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Robert O'Callahan
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> >
>> >
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> I don't know why we would allow there to be a long gap between (a) and (b).
> Maintaining/supporting two sets of the same code is costly. So if we get
> the rust code working and shipping on all platforms, I can't think of a
> reason why we w
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> (4) Have the APIs hidden behind access controls that need to be enabled by
> an extension
> (but a trivial one). Perhaps you think this is #2.
>
I realized I don't understand exactly what this means.
I assume "extension" means a privileged
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Sure. Conversely, I don't find myself convinced by your position.
>
> Would be happy to talk about this live if you think that's useful.
>
Probably not ... these are judgement calls that are difficult to resolve.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tn
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
>> There are three possible approaches I can see to expose USB devices to
>> third-party applications:
>> 1) What I suggested: Whitelist vendor ori
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> > 1) What I suggested: Whitelist vendor origins for access to their devices
> > and have vendor-hosted pages ("Web drivers"?) expose "saf
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
> I'd really like to see WebUSB with USB device IDs are bound to specific
>> origins (through a registry for legacy devices and through the USB proto
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Are you thinking of something like WebUSB?
> (https://reillyeon.github.io/webusb/)? This is something we've looked at
> a bit but we're still trying to wrap our heads around the security
> implications.
>
Where are we discussing that? I'd re
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
Should we finally bite the bullet and force a flush in reftests/crashtests?
You mean force a flush in the load event handler in the test harness,
before the test's load event handler runs?
> After thinking about this for a while, I haven't
Fantastic!!!
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneires
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> Our tests relying on this is probably because certain bugs are only
> detectable when we apply content/style change after a layout flush.
>
That's right. This change is likely to hide more bugs than it causes.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoeh
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 11/26/15 9:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> We've always done it, but I can't think of any good reasons.
>>
>
> I've tried to fix this in the past and ran into two problems.
>
>
We've always done it, but I can't think of any good reasons. I seem to
recall that one reason was we want onload to be usable to measure
page-load-and-layout time, but that would be a bad reason.
If we didn't do that, we could run onload scripts earlier and maybe do less
layout if they update the
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:24 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2015-11-24 18:21 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
> > Presumably it's equally important to replace the remaining
> > nsRenderingContext usage with DrawTarget?
> >
> > (nsRenderingContext was the previous API before gfxContext.)
>
> E
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Nicholas Nethercote <
n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> >>
> >> One major remaining Moz2Dification step is the conversion of thebes
> >> types such as gfxSiz
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> One major remaining Moz2Dification step is the conversion of thebes
> types such as gfxSize, gfxPoint, gfxRect, and gfxMatrix to their Moz2D
> equivalents. But this is largely blocked by the fact that the thebes
> types use double-prec
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> I think the best thing we can do right now is get a second implementation
> into wide circulation. This will highlight compat issues yes, but also
> help avoid baking chrome specific behavior into all the sites using service
> workers.
>
Yes.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Geoff Lankow wrote:
> It's a lot harder to do what "background-size: cover" does, with an .
How about object-fit:cover?
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/object-fit
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Geoff Lankow wrote:
> I'm displaying some quite large (6+ megapixels) images using CSS
> background-image, and sometimes want to swap one for another. If I just
> change the CSS property, there is a noticeable flicker as the first image
> is removed, then the secon
html5test.com gives points for supporting those types. That alone
doesn't justifying doing them, but it's not nothing either.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l e
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> But I think that the clear directive from project leadership has been
> to prioritize Firefox development over other Gecko based projects.
>
I don't think that's unqualified. If killing off Thunderbird forever saves
a Firefox developer fiv
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
> Please submit tests to web-platform-tests and create a pull request to
> the HTML standard.
>
Will do, after a decent interval to collect feedback. I wrote
web-platform-tests to land with our implementation.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264412
Webkit, Blink and Trident have been shipping this for years without a spec
and with poor interop. We held off on implementing it since you can
polyfill a better implementation in JS without much difficulty, but we have
to implement something for
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
>> I'm sad that I won't be able to use jar: URLs to load testcases in ZIP
>> files uploaded to Bugzilla, but this sounds like the right thi
I'm sad that I won't be able to use jar: URLs to load testcases in ZIP
files uploaded to Bugzilla, but this sounds like the right thing to do.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,ao
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Marcus Cavanaugh wrote:
> APZ is wonderful, making the web feel smooth when a page's demands would
> otherwise cause jank. In many cases, it's the *only* reason we're able to
> create decent experiences today, particularly on mobile.
>
> It does, however, highlight
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 2015-09-25 12:01 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
>
>> At Mozilla, it seems like previous discussions on this kind of thing
>> (style and warnings come to mind) have dealt with this at a
>> file/directory/module level... Someone fixes up a thing
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:20 AM, wrote:
> MSE is playback only, so no option for live broadcast.
>
What do you mean? There doesn't seem to be any reason why MSE can't do live
broadcast.
If you're using HLS, you can use MSE.
https://github.com/dailymotion/hls.js
> WebRTC is VP9 and a peer pro
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> Our static analysis builds can be easily triggered from the try server
> (although I have been unable to get anyone interested to fix bug 1116518 to
> make those builds happen on the try server by default, which makes it all
> too easy for p
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
> Any questions, comments?
>
This whitepaper on Infer is an interesting read:
https://fbcdn-dragon-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t39.2365-6/10935986_985284008163608_74391_n/Moving_Fast_with_Software_Verification.pdf
(misleading title t
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for reading and fixing Performance regressions when they show up in
> your patches!
>
FWIW I agree that Talos results for Linux32 are unimportant. Even if there
was a Linux-32-only regression, I don't think it'd be worth our developers
spending ti
Why not make scan-builds and infer results public? Those are public tools
so we should assume black-hats already have the resutls.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o
Courtesy of Rick Byers, who is promoting an increased focus on interop
within Blink/Chromium, it's now possible for "trusted" Mozilla developers
to get editbugs access to Chromium's bug tracker, initially just a small
number of us. I just got granted access. So if you want access, let me know
and w
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
> That bug does not seem to support the claim that they intend to ship
> this feature. No intent-to-ship is mentioned, and it appears the
> intent-to-implement has not been sent.
>
Here's evidence they intend to implement:
https://docs.google.com/do
Yes, I think we should do this.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodv
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:
> I would like to hear a good argument why this confusing behaviour should
> be maintained. I don't consider the following a good argument (quote):
> "Believe me when I say that *every single time* we have tried to "fix"
> something here, someo
FWIW Webkit has long had the convention of using Foo::create() as the sole
creation point for refcounted objects. I like the idea. Apart from
enforcing the invariant that every new object is addrefed, it can slightly
optimize object creation by initializing the refcount to 1.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea ye
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> The need is not for an event, no? But rather for an API which allows
> the page to tell the browser that it's ready for initial rendering?
>
Right. Which gets turned into an event that's sent to the browser.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Often times the "chrome" of a webapp is ready before various other
> things that are loaded during initial page load is loaded.
>
OK then, I guess a new event is needed.
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnen
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Zibi Braniecki <
zbigniew.branie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So maybe we would need another event that the website fires to indicate
> when it for paint/cache/screenshot.
>
Assuming pages have an easy way to block the 'load' event until they're
ready, can this just be
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> i enabled layers.async-pan-zoom.enabled in firefox on Mac OSX Yosemite,
> and noticed dramatic performance increase.
>
Great!
> Problem it this introduced some bugs, like disabling scrolling completely
> on some pages, such as a google search pag
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/23/15 11:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> By "SVG resource document" do you mean one that is fetched as an
>> image?
>>
>
> In Gecko's case I specifically mean one fetched as a paint server.
>
> It's somewhat of an implementation de
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Done.
>
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inbound&revision=939320b957c5
Excellent!
> - deciding how to handle the situation for people who don't have gtk3
> installed on their system. Currently, firefox will silently
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > >
> > > There are a few remaining perma reds and oranges, FWIW.
> >
> > Which ones? I don't see anything on elm.
>
> W
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Jeff Muizelaar
wrote:
> I believe Flash does.
>
OK, I can't get it to work, but I think it's just my system.
I verified that Fedora 22 (and I think 21) shipped GTK3 Firefox. If there
aren't any major blocking bugs for GTK3 >= 3.4, and the tests are green, I
thin
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Good point. We also need to call
> URL.revokeObjectURL(this.mOldObjectURL); in the .src setter and in the
> dtor.
>
OK, but we still leak if someone saves a reference to the HTMLMediaElement
as an expando property of the Blob/File.
It woul
Jeff, does Flash with with GTK3 builds?
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer hol
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
