On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-25 12:01 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: > >> At Mozilla, it seems like previous discussions on this kind of thing >> (style and warnings come to mind) have dealt with this at a >> file/directory/module level... Someone fixes up a thing completely, adds >> it to a whitelist, and then it's a simple pass/fail. Could that work >> here too? >> > > Yes, that is another option for checks that tons of existing code don't > pass. That'll help some. The problem of attributing new errors to the correct part of the diff remains, and is quite interesting. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
