Re: Intent-to-Ship: Backward-Compatibility FIDO U2F support for Google Accounts

2019-03-22 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Hi all, Some naive questions to understand what's happened here. Is https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-u2f-v1.0-nfc-bt-amendment-20150514/fido-u2f-javascript-api.html#high-level-javascript-api the API that will be added to Firefox? Is https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/resource

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-12-15 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
e exists. +Luke Bjerring FYI. On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 4:09 PM David Burns wrote: > Thanks for this Philip. > > I have started raising bugs and blocking > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1498357. > > David > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:41, Philip Jägenstedt > w

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-12-14 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:41 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:42 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:53 PM Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > > > > On 10/13/18 3:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > >

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-12-14 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:42 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:53 PM Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > > On 10/13/18 3:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > > Fiddling with these rules can reveal lots > > > more potential issues, and if you

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-19 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:53 PM Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > On 10/13/18 3:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > Fiddling with these rules can reveal lots > > more potential issues, and if you like I could provide reports on that too. > > I would be pretty interested in that

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-17 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:03 PM Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > On 10/17/18 11:56 AM, James Graham wrote: > > On 17/10/2018 10:12, James Graham wrote: > >> On 17/10/2018 01:23, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > >>> Hi Philip, > >>> > >>> Do you know how do reftests run in order to get that data? > >>>

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 09:17 Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 22:34 Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> On 10/11/18 4:22 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> > https://gist.github.com/foolip/a77c88e62aa3cfc461c2879f3e5d4855 is a >> > list of tests that fail i

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 22:34 Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 10/11/18 4:22 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > https://gist.github.com/foolip/a77c88e62aa3cfc461c2879f3e5d4855 is a > > list of tests that fail in Firefox Nightly, but pass in stable > > versions of Chrome, Edge an

web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-11 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Hi all, I sent the result of some investigation to webkit-dev [1] today and thought you might be interested to take a look the equivalent list for Firefox. https://gist.github.com/foolip/a77c88e62aa3cfc461c2879f3e5d4855 is a list of tests that fail in Firefox Nightly, but pass in stable versions

Re: Intent to implement (again): Shadow DOM

2017-12-04 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > On 11/27/2017 02:01 PM, James Graham wrote: > > On 27/11/17 12:20, smaug wrote: > >> This is basically an after the fact notification that > >> we're in progress of implementing Shadow DOM again, this time v1[1]. > >> While doing this,

Re: Intent to implement (again): Shadow DOM

2017-11-28 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > > On 11/28/2017 10:44 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM Emilio Cobos Álvarez > <mailto:emi...@crisal.io>> wrote: > > > > On 11/27/2017 02:01 PM, James Gr

Re: Intent to implement (again): Shadow DOM

2017-11-28 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > On 11/27/2017 02:01 PM, James Graham wrote: > > On 27/11/17 12:20, smaug wrote: > >> This is basically an after the fact notification that > >> we're in progress of implementing Shadow DOM again, this time v1[1]. > >> While doing this,